Recall Enforment Report D-0105-2024
Recall Details
Multi event Drug Recall Enforcement Report Class II voluntary initiated by Omega & Delta Co., Inc., originally initiated on 10-20-2023 for the product Equate Hand Sanitizer (Ethyl Alcohol 62%), 7.5 FL.OZ. (221 mL) UPC 6 81131 05961 9 The product was recalled due to sub potent and super potent product: during an impact assessment of the dop hand sanitizer product, it was identified that several lots distributed did not comply with the finished good acceptance criteria established.. The product was distributed in Distributed In Puerto Rico Only. and the recall is currently ongoing.
Recall Enforcement Reports
Recall Number | Recall Initiation Date | Report Date | Recall Classification | Quantity | Product Description | Recall Reason | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D-0105-2024 | 10-20-2023 | 11-22-2023 | Class II | 4,848 7.5 oz bottles | Equate Hand Sanitizer (Ethyl Alcohol 62%), 7.5 FL.OZ. (221 mL) UPC 6 81131 05961 9 | Sub Potent and Super Potent Product: During an impact assessment of the DOP Hand Sanitizer product, it was identified that several lots distributed did not comply with the finished good acceptance criteria established. | Ongoing |
D-0103-2024 | 10-20-2023 | 11-22-2023 | Class II | 48,145 4 oz bottles | DOP Instant Hand Sanitizer (Ethyl Alcohol 65%) with Moisturizers, Original, 4FL OZ (118 ml) bottle, Hecho en Puerto Rico por: Omega & Delta Co., Inc. UPC 7 42699 00027 4 | Sub Potent and Super Potent Product: During an impact assessment of the DOP Hand Sanitizer product, it was identified that several lots distributed did not comply with the finished good acceptance criteria established. | Ongoing |
D-0104-2024 | 10-20-2023 | 11-22-2023 | Class II | 23,136 8 OZ bottles | DOP Instant Hand Sanitizer (Ethyl Alcohol 65%) with Moisturizers, 8FL OZ (237mL) bottle, Hecho en Puerto Rico por: Omega & Delta Co., Inc. UPC 7 42699 00030 4 | Sub Potent and Super Potent Product: During an impact assessment of the DOP Hand Sanitizer product, it was identified that several lots distributed did not comply with the finished good acceptance criteria established. | Ongoing |