PedvaxHIB, in a lyophilized formulation (lyophilized PedvaxHIB), was initially evaluated in 3,486 Native American (Navajo) infants, who completed the primary two-dose regimen in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (The Protective Efficacy Study). At the time of the study, this population had a much higher incidence of Hib disease than the United States population as a whole and also had a lower antibody response to Haemophilus b Conjugate Vaccines, including PedvaxHIB.{14,15,16,30,33}
Each infant in this study received two doses of either placebo or lyophilized PedvaxHIB with the first dose administered at a mean of 8 weeks of age and the second administered approximately two months later; DTP and OPV were administered concomitantly. Antibody levels were measured in a subset of each group (TABLE 1).
TABLE 1: Antibody Responses in Navajo Infants| Vaccine | No. of Subjects | Time | % Subjects with | Anti-PRP GMT (mcg/mL) |
| >0.15 mcg/mL | >1.0 mcg/mL |
Lyophilized PedvaxHIBPost-Vaccination values obtained approximately 1–3 months after each dose. | 416 The Protective Efficacy Study | Pre-Vaccination | 44 | 10 | 0.16 |
| 416 | Post-Dose 1 | 88 | 52 | 0.95 |
| 416 | Post-Dose 2 | 91 | 60 | 1.43 |
| Placebo | 461 | Pre-Vaccination | 44 | 9 | 0.16 |
| 461 | Post-Dose 1 | 21 | 2 | 0.09 |
| 461 | Post-Dose 2 | 14 | 1 | 0.08 |
Lyophilized PedvaxHIB | 27 Immunogenicity Trial{34} | Prebooster | 70 | 33 | 0.51 |
| 27 | Postbooster Booster given at 12 months of age; Post-Vaccination values obtained 1 month after administration of booster dose. | 100 | 89 | 8.39 |
Most subjects were initially followed until 15 to 18 months of age. During this time, 22 cases of invasive Hib disease occurred in the placebo group (8 cases after the first dose and 14 cases after the second dose) and only 1 case in the vaccine group (none after the first dose and 1 after the second dose). Following the primary two-dose regimen, the protective efficacy of lyophilized PedvaxHIB was calculated to be 93% with a 95% confidence interval of 57%-98% (p=0.001, two-tailed). In the two months between the first and second doses, the difference in number of cases of disease between placebo and vaccine recipients (8 vs. 0 cases, respectively) was statistically significant (p=0.008, two-tailed); however, a primary two-dose regimen is required for infants 2-14 months of age.
At termination of the study, placebo recipients were offered vaccine. All original participants were then followed two years and nine months from termination of the study. During this extended follow-up, invasive Hib disease occurred in an additional seven of the original placebo recipients prior to receiving vaccine and in one of the original vaccine recipients (who had received only one dose of vaccine). No cases of invasive Hib disease were observed in placebo recipients after they received at least one dose of vaccine. Efficacy for this follow-up period, estimated from person-days at risk, was 96.6% (95 C.I., 72.2-99.9%) in children under 18 months of age and 100% (95 C.I., 23.5-100%) in children over 18 months of age.{33}
Since protective efficacy with lyophilized PedvaxHIB was demonstrated in such a high risk population, it would be expected to be predictive of efficacy in other populations.
The safety and immunogenicity of lyophilized PedvaxHIB were evaluated in infants and children in other clinical studies that were conducted in various locations throughout the United States. PedvaxHIB was highly immunogenic in all age groups studied.{31,32}
Lyophilized PedvaxHIB induced antibody levels greater than 1.0 mcg/mL in children who were poor responders to nonconjugated PRP vaccines. In a study involving such a subpopulation,{33,34} 34 children ranging in age from 27 to 61 months who developed invasive Hib disease despite previous vaccination with nonconjugated PRP vaccines were randomly assigned to 2 groups. One group (n=14) was vaccinated with lyophilized PedvaxHIB and the other group (n=20) with a nonconjugated PRP vaccine at a mean interval of approximately 12 months after recovery from disease. All 14 children vaccinated with lyophilized PedvaxHIB but only 6 of 20 children re-vaccinated with a nonconjugated PRP vaccine achieved an antibody level of >1.0 mcg/mL. The 14 children who had not responded to revaccination with the nonconjugated PRP vaccine were then vaccinated with a single dose of lyophilized PedvaxHIB; following this vaccination, all achieved antibody levels of >1.0 mcg/mL.
In addition, lyophilized PedvaxHIB has been studied in children at high risk of Hib disease because of genetically-related deficiencies [Blacks who were Km(1) allotype negative and Caucasians who were G2m(23) allotype negative] and are considered hyporesponsive to nonconjugated PRP vaccines on this basis.{35} The hyporesponsive children had anti-PRP responses comparable to those of allotype positive children of similar age range when vaccinated with lyophilized PedvaxHIB. All children achieved anti-PRP levels of >1.0 mcg/mL.
The safety and immunogenicity of Liquid PedvaxHIB were compared with those of lyophilized PedvaxHIB in a randomized clinical study involving 903 infants 2 to 6 months of age from the general U.S. population. DTP and OPV were administered concomitantly to most subjects. The antibody responses induced by each formulation of PedvaxHIB were similar. TABLE 2 shows antibody responses from this clinical study in subjects who received their first dose at 2 to 3 months of age.
TABLE 2: Antibody Responses to Liquid and Lyophilized PedvaxHIB in Infants From the General U.S. Population| Formulation | Age (Months) | Time | No. of Subjects | % Subjects with anti-PRP | Anti-PRP GMT (mcg/mL) |
| >0.15 mcg/mL | >1.0 mcg/mL |
Liquid PedvaxHIB (7.5 mcg PRP) | | Pre-Vaccination | 487 | 32 | 7 | 0.12 |
| 2-3 | Post-Dose 1 Approximately two months Post-Vaccination | 480 | 94 | 64 | 1.55 |
| Post-Dose 2 Approximately one month Post-Vaccination | 393 | 97 | 80 | 3.22 |
| 12-15 | Prebooster | 284 | 80 | 30 | 0.49 |
| | Postbooster | 284 | 99 | 95 | 10.23 |
| 24 Approximately | Persistence | 94 | 97 | 55 | 1.29 |
| |
Lyophilized PedvaxHIB (15 mcg PRP) | | Pre-Vaccination | 171 | 37 | 6 | 0.13 |
| 2-3 | Post-Dose 1 | 169 | 97 | 72 | 1.88 |
| Post-Dose 2 | 133 | 99 | 81 | 2.69 |
| 12-15 | Prebooster | 87 | 71 | 28 | 0.39 |
| | Postbooster | 87 | 99 | 91 | 7.64 |
| 24 | Persistence | 37 | 97 | 54 | 1.10 |
A booster dose of PedvaxHIB is required in infants who complete the primary two-dose regimen before 12 months of age. This booster dose will help maintain antibody levels during the first two years of life when children are at highest risk for invasive Hib disease. (See TABLE 2 and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)
In four United States studies, antibody responses to lyophilized PedvaxHIB were evaluated in several subpopulations of infants initially vaccinated between 2 to 3 months of age. (See TABLE 3.)
TABLE 3: Antibody ResponsesOne month after the second dose
After Two Doses of Lyophilized PedvaxHIB Among Infants Initially Vaccinated at 2–3 Months of Age By Racial/Ethnic Group| LYOPHILIZED |
| |
Racial/Ethnic Groups | No. of Subjects | % Subjects With Anti-PRP | Anti-PRP GMT (mcg/mL) |
| >0.15 mcg/mL | >1.0 mcg/mL |
| Native American Apache and Navajo | 54 | 96 | 70 | 2.47 |
| Caucasian | 201 | 99 | 82 | 3.52 |
| Hispanic | 76 | 99 | 88 | 3.54 |
| Black | 23 | 100 | 96 | 5.40 |
In two United States studies, antibody responses to Liquid PedvaxHIB were evaluated in several subpopulations of infants initially vaccinated between 2 to 3 months of age. (See TABLE 4.)
TABLE 4: Antibody ResponsesOne month after the second dose
After Two Doses of Liquid PedvaxHIB Among Infants Initially Vaccinated at 2–3 Months of Age By Racial/Ethnic Group| LIQUID |
| |
Racial/Ethnic Groups | No. of Subjects | % Subjects With Anti-PRP | Anti-PRP GMT (mcg/mL) |
| >0.15 mcg/mL | >1.0 mcg/mL |
| Native American Apache and Navajo | 90 | 97 | 78 | 2.76 |
| Caucasian | 143 | 94 | 72 | 2.16 |
| Hispanic | 184 | 98 | 85 | 4.34 |
| Black | 18 | 100 | 94 | 7.58 |
Antibodies to the OMPC of N. meningitidis have been demonstrated in vaccinee sera, but the clinical relevance of these antibodies has not been established.{33}