- Use an in-line 0.2 micron polyethersulfone (PES) filter for infusion of MYLOTARG.
- Protect the intravenous bag from light using a light-blocking cover during infusion. The infusion line does not need to be protected from light.
- Infuse the diluted solution over 2 hours.
- Do not mix MYLOTARG with, or administer as an infusion with, other medicinal products.
Combination Therapy in Newly-Diagnosed De Novo CD33-positive AML
The safety of MYLOTARG in first-line combination therapy was evaluated in two prospective clinical trials, Study ALFA-0701 in adults and Study AAML0531 in pediatric patients.
Study ALFA-0701
The safety evaluation of MYLOTARG (3 mg/m2 Day 1, 4 and 7 in combination with daunorubicin and cytarabine [DA]) in adults is based on data from ALFA-0701 for 131 patients treated with MYLOTARG plus DA and in 137 patients treated with DA alone [see Clinical Studies (14.1)]. In this study, 123 patients received all 3 fractionated doses of MYLOTARG and 7 patients missed at least 1 dose, with a mean total dose administered during induction of 14.51 mg (range: 4.6–18.0). MYLOTARG was received by 91 (70%) patients in the MYLOTARG arm during Consolidation 1 and 64 (49%) patients in the MYLOTARG arm during Consolidation 2.
Safety data consisting of selected TEAEs considered most important for understanding the safety profile of MYLOTARG as well as all adverse events (AEs) that led to the permanent discontinuation of treatment were retrospectively collected. The selected TEAEs consisted of all grades hemorrhages, all grades VOD, and severe infections.
Discontinuation due to any adverse reaction occurred in 31% of patients in the MYLOTARG arm versus 7% in the DA arm. The most frequent (greater than or equal to 1%) adverse reactions for patients treated with MYLOTARG that led to permanent discontinuation were thrombocytopenia (15%), VOD (3%), and septic shock (2%).
Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 8 patients (6%) in the MYLOTARG arm versus 3 patients (2%) in the DA arm. In the MYLOTARG arm, 3 patients died of VOD, 4 patients died of hemorrhage-related events (CNS hemorrhage, hemorrhagic shock), and 1 patient died of suspected cardiac cause. In the DA arm, 3 patients died of sepsis.
Table 2. Selected Grade 3 and Higher Adverse Reactions in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed De Novo AML in ALFA-0701 | MYLOTARG + Daunorubicin + Cytarabine (n, %) | Daunorubicin + Cytarabine (n, %) |
|---|
| Abbreviations: AML=acute myeloid leukemia; N=number of patients; PT=preferred term. |
| Induction | N = 131 | N = 137 |
| Infection Infection is a grouped term consisting of multiple preferred terms. | 61 (47%) | 53 (39%) |
| Hemorrhage Hemorrhage is a grouped term consisting of multiple preferred terms. | 24 (18%) | 12 (9%) |
| Veno-occlusive liver disease Veno-occlusive liver disease includes the following reported PTs: Veno-occlusive liver disease, veno-occlusive disease. | 3 (2%) | 0 |
| Consolidation 1 | N = 91 | N = 103 |
| Infection | 50 (55%) | 43 (42%) |
| Hemorrhage | 5 (5%) | 0 |
| Veno-occlusive liver disease | 0 | 0 |
| Consolidation 2 | N = 64 | N = 107 |
| Infection | 32 (50%) | 54 (50%) |
| Hemorrhage | 4 (6%) | 0 |
| Veno-occlusive liver disease | 0 | 0 |
All patients in ALFA-0701 developed severe neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia. The incidence of Grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia that was prolonged in the absence of active leukemia was higher in patients treated with MYLOTARG (Table 3).
Table 3. Prolonged CytopeniasPlatelets less than 50 Gi/L or neutrophils less than 0.5 Gi/L lasting past cycle Day 42 in the absence of active leukemia.
in ALFA-0701 | MYLOTARG + Daunorubicin + Cytarabine (n/N, %) | Daunorubicin + Cytarabine (n/N, %) |
|---|
| Induction |
| Prolonged thrombocytopenia | 19/101 (19%) | 7/97 (7%) |
| Prolonged neutropenia | 3/106 (3%) | 0/101 (0%) |
| Consolidation 1 |
| Prolonged thrombocytopenia | 21/87 (24%) | 6/91 (7%) |
| Prolonged neutropenia | 3/88 (3%) | 1/97 (1%) |
| Consolidation 2 |
| Prolonged thrombocytopenia | 22/62 (35%) | 25/103 (24%) |
| Prolonged neutropenia | 1/62 (2%) | 2/105 (2%) |
Table 4 summarizes shifts in selected chemistry abnormalities by treatment arm for patients treated in ALFA-0701.
Table 4. Chemistry Laboratory Values: Shifts in Subjects with Baseline Grade 2 or Lower Values in ALFA-0701 | MYLOTARG + Daunorubicin + Cytarabine | Daunorubicin + Cytarabine |
|---|
| Laboratory Abnormality | Subjects (n) with baseline Grade less than or equal to 2 | Progressed to Grade greater than or equal to 3 (n, %) | Subjects (n) with baseline Grade less than or equal to 2 | Progressed to Grade greater than or equal to 3 (n, %) |
|---|
| Hypophosphatemia | 117 | 75 (64%) | 127 | 52 (41%) |
| Hypokalemia | 127 | 73 (57%) | 133 | 41 (31%) |
| Hyponatremia | 129 | 57 (44%) | 134 | 36 (27%) |
| Alkaline phosphatase increased | 120 | 16 (13%) | 128 | 7 (5%) |
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 126 | 18 (14%) | 132 | 11 (8%) |
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | 124 | 13 (10%) | 132 | 20 (15%) |
| Blood bilirubin increased | 119 | 9 (8%) | 126 | 5 (4%) |
Study AAML0531
The safety evaluation of MYLOTARG in combination with chemotherapy in pediatric patients is based on data from AAML0531 [see Clinical Studies (14.1)] in randomized and treated patients (N = 520 MYLOTARG and chemotherapy and N = 517 chemotherapy alone). In the MYLOTARG arm of this study, 520 patients received Induction 1 and 326 patients received Intensification 2.
Safety data collected included only Grade 3 and 4 nonhematologic adverse events, deaths, VOD/SOS, and prolongation of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia.
Table 5 shows the Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions (≥5%) in the MYLOTARG + chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone arms in patients with newly-diagnosed de novo AML in AAML0531.
In the MYLOTARG + chemotherapy arm, fatal adverse reactions (by grouped terms) were infection (14 [3%]), multi-organ failure (5 [1%]), anemia (1 [<1%]), and hemorrhage (3 [<1%]). In the chemotherapy arm, fatal adverse reactions included infection (7 [1%]), multi-organ failure (6 [1%]), hepatic failure (1 [<1%]), hypotension (3 [<1%]), and hemorrhage (3 [<1%]).
Table 5. Grade 3 and Higher Adverse Reactions (≥5%) in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed De Novo AML in AAML0531 During Treatment Cycles with MYLOTARG | Induction 1 | Intensification 2 |
|---|
| MYLOTARG + Chemotherapy N = 520 n (%) | Chemotherapy alone N = 517 n (%) | MYLOTARG + Chemotherapy N = 326 n (%) | Chemotherapy alone N = 304 n (%) |
|---|
| Infection Grouped term consisting of multiple preferred terms | 186 (36%) | 181 (35%) | 220 (67%) | 211 (69%) |
| Febrile neutropenia | 167 (32%) | 157 (30%) | 79 (24%) | 68 (22%) |
| Decreased appetite | 78 (15%) | 79 (15%) | 61 (19%) | 36 (12%) |
| Hyperglycemia | 59 (11%) | 55 (11%) | 36 (11%) | 28 (9%) |
| Mucositis | 55 (11%) | 64 (12%) | 25 (8%) | 15 (5%) |
| Hypoxia | 35 (7%) | 26 (5%) | 19 (6%) | 22 (7%) |
| Hemorrhage | 36 (7%) | 19 (4%) | 19 (6%) | 9 (3%) |
| Transaminase Increased | 33 (6%) | 24 (5%) | 23 (7%) | 13 (4%) |
| Diarrhea | 21 (4%) | 36 (7%) | 15 (5%) | 10 (3%) |
| Nausea | 21 (4%) | 18 (4%) | 23 (7%) | 10 (3%) |
| Hypotension | 16 (3%) | 26 (5%) | 28 (9%) | 23 (8%) |
The addition of MYLOTARG to chemotherapy was associated with a higher incidence of prolonged thrombocytopenia and neutropenia particularly when used in Intensification 2. During Intensification 2, prolonged thrombocytopenia (platelets <50 Gi/L lasting past cycle Day 42 in the absence of active leukemia) was reported in 64% (190/297) of patients in the MYLOTARG + chemotherapy arm compared with 55% (146/264) in the chemotherapy alone arm. Prolonged neutropenia (neutrophils <0.5 Gi/L lasting past cycle Day 42 in the absence of active leukemia) occurred in 47% (142/300) versus 43% (118/275) of patients, respectively. The prolonged cytopenias were associated with more deaths in remission in the MYLOTARG + chemotherapy arm (29 [5%]) compared to the chemotherapy alone arm (15 [3%]).
VOD events were reported in 25 (5%) patients in the MYLOTARG + chemotherapy arm as well as 25 (5%) of the chemotherapy alone arm. VOD was fatal in 2 (<1%) and 7 (1%) patients in the MYLOTARG + chemotherapy arm and chemotherapy alone arm, respectively.
Monotherapy for Newly-Diagnosed CD33-positive AML
The safety evaluation of MYLOTARG (6 mg/m2 then 3 mg/m2, with 7 days between the doses) as monotherapy is based on a randomized, open-label, Phase 3 trial of MYLOTARG (N=118) versus best supportive care (BSC) (N=119) in patients with previously untreated AML who were considered ineligible for intensive chemotherapy in Study AML-19 [see Clinical Studies (14.1)].
The overall incidence of any Grade adverse reactions reported in AML-19 was 87% in the MYLOTARG arm and 90% in the BSC arm. The incidence of Grade greater than or equal to 3 adverse reactions was 61% in the MYLOTARG arm and 68% in the BSC arm. Death due to any Adverse Event was reported in the MYLOTARG arm of 19 (17%) compared to the BSC arm of 23 (20%).
Table 6. Selected Adverse Reactions in AML-19 | MYLOTARG n=111 | Best Supportive Care n=114 |
|---|
| Any Grade | Grade ≥3 | Any Grade | Grade ≥3 |
|---|
| Liver | 57 (51%) | 8 (7%) | 52 (46%) | 7 (6%) |
| Fatigue | 51 (46%) | 13 (12%) | 69 (61%) | 24 (21%) |
| Infection | 49 (44%) | 39 (35%) | 48 (42%) | 39 (34%) |
| Cardiac | 31 (28%) | 7 (6%) | 37 (33%) | 16 (14%) |
| Bleeding | 28 (25%) | 14 (13%) | 34 (30%) | 14 (12%) |
| Febrile neutropenia | 20 (18%) | 20 (18%) | 27 (24%) | 27 (24%) |
| Metabolic | 18 (16%) | 4 (4%) | 17 (15%) | 7 (6%) |
| Renal | 7 (6%) | 4 (4%) | 9 (8%) | 5 (4%) |
Monotherapy for Relapsed or Refractory CD33-positive AML
The adverse reactions described in this section reflect exposure to MYLOTARG 3 mg/m2 on Days 1, 4 and 7 as monotherapy in 57 patients with relapsed AML treated on MyloFrance-1 [see Clinical Studies (14.1)]. All 57 (100%) patients received the 3 planned doses of MYLOTARG.
During the treatment period, Grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) that occurred in greater than 1% patients included sepsis (32%), fever (16%), rash (11%), pneumonia (7%), bleeding (7%), mucositis (4%), pain (4%), diarrhea (2%), headaches (2%), tachycardia (2%), and lung edema (2%). No Grade 4 toxicity was observed. All grade TEAEs that occurred in greater than 15% of patients included fever (79%), infection (42%), increased AST (40%), bleeding (23%), nausea and vomiting (21%), constipation (21%), mucositis (21%), headache (19%), increased ALT (16%), and rash (16%). No infectious deaths occurred. Grade 1 or 2 hyperbilirubinemia developed in 4 (7%) patients. No episodes of VOD occurred. Seven patients received HSCT after MYLOTARG treatment. Three patients received an allogeneic BMT and 4 patients were treated with autologous BMT. No patients developed VOD following HSCT.
Risk Summary
Based on its mechanism of action and findings from animal studies [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.1), Nonclinical Toxicology (13.1)], MYLOTARG can cause embryo-fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. There are no available data on MYLOTARG use in pregnant women to evaluate for a drug-associated risk. In animal reproduction studies, gemtuzumab ozogamicin caused embryo-fetal toxicity, including structural abnormalities and alterations to growth, at maternal systemic exposures that were greater than or equal to 0.4 times the exposure in patients at the maximum recommended dose based on AUC (see Data). Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus.
The estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown. All pregnancies have a background risk of birth defect, loss, or other adverse outcomes. In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2–4% and 15–20%, respectively.
Data
Animal Data
In an embryo-fetal development study in rats, pregnant animals received daily intravenous doses up to 1.2 mg/m2/day gemtuzumab ozogamicin during the period of organogenesis. Embryo-fetal toxicities including fetal growth retardation as evidenced by decreased live fetal weights, incidence of fetal wavy ribs and delayed skeletal ossification were observed at greater than or equal to 0.15 mg/m2/day. Increased embryo-fetal lethality and fetal morphological anomalies (digital malformations, absence of the aortic arch, anomalies in the long bones in the forelimbs, misshapen scapula, absence of a vertebral centrum, and fused sternebrae) were observed at greater than or equal to 0.36 mg/m2/day. All doses with embryo-fetal effects were observed in the presence of maternal toxicity that included decreases in gestational body weight gain, food consumption, and gravid uterine weight. The lowest dose at which embryo-fetal effects were observed in rats (0.15 mg/m2/day) was 0.4 times the exposure in patients at the maximum recommended human dose, based on AUC.
Risk Summary
There are no data on the presence of gemtuzumab ozogamicin or its metabolites in human milk, the effects on the breastfed infant, or the effects on milk production. Because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in the breastfed infant, advise women not to breastfeed during treatment with MYLOTARG and for at least 1 month after the final dose.
Pregnancy Testing
Verify the pregnancy status in females of reproductive potential prior to initiating MYLOTARG.
Contraception
Females
Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with MYLOTARG and for at least 6 months after the last dose [see Nonclinical Toxicology (13.1)].
Males
Advise males with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with MYLOTARG and for at least 3 months after the last dose [see Nonclinical Toxicology (13.1)].
Infertility
Females
Based on findings in animals, MYLOTARG may impair female fertility [see Nonclinical Toxicology (13.1)].
Males
Based on findings in animals, MYLOTARG may impair male fertility [see Nonclinical Toxicology (13.1)].
Distribution
N-acetyl gamma calicheamicin dimethyl hydrazide is approximately 97% bound to human plasma proteins in vitro. Population PK analyses found the total volume of distribution of hP67.6 antibody (sum of V1 [6.31 L] and V2 [15.1 L]) to be approximately 21.4 L in patients.
Elimination
The clearance (CL) value of hP67.6 from plasma was 0.35 L/h after the first dose and 0.15 L/h after the second dose, a decrease of roughly 60%. The terminal plasma half-life (t½) for hP67.6 was 62 hours after the first dose and 90 hours after the second dose.
Metabolism
In vitro studies demonstrated that N-acetyl gamma calicheamicin dimethyl hydrazide is extensively metabolized, primarily via nonenzymatic reduction of the disulfide moiety.
Specific Populations
Age, race, sex, mild or moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance [CLcr] 30–89 mL/min calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation) or mild hepatic impairment had no clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of gemtuzumab ozogamicin. The pharmacokinetics of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in patients with severe renal impairment (CLcr 15–29 mL/min) or moderate (total bilirubin greater than 1.5× to 3.0× ULN) and severe hepatic impairment (total bilirubin greater than 3× ULN) is unknown.
Drug Interaction Studies
No clinical drug interaction studies have been performed.
In Vitro Studies
At clinically relevant concentrations, gemtuzumab ozogamicin had a low potential to:
- Inhibit CYP450 Enzymes: CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4/5.
At clinically relevant concentrations, N-acetyl gamma calicheamicin dimethyl hydrazide had a low potential to:
- Inhibit CYP450 Enzymes: CYP1A2, CYP2B6 , CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4/5.
- Induce CYP450 Enzymes: CYP1A2, CYP2B6, and CYP3A4.
- Inhibit UGT Enzymes: UGT1A1, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A9, and UGT2B7.
- Inhibit Drug Transporters: P-gp (P-glycoprotein), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), organic anion transporter (OAT)1 and OAT3, organic cation transporter (OCT)2, and organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B1 and OATP1B3.
Study ALFA-0701
MYLOTARG in combination with chemotherapy was evaluated in ALFA-0701 (NCT00927498), a multicenter, randomized, open-label Phase 3 study of 271 patients with newly-diagnosed de novo AML ages 50 to 70 years. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive induction therapy consisting of daunorubicin (60 mg/m2 on Days 1 to 3) and cytarabine (200 mg/m2 on Days 1 to 7) (DA) with (n=135) or without (n=136) MYLOTARG 3 mg/m2 (up to maximum of one vial) on Days 1, 4, and 7. Patients who did not achieve a response after first induction could receive a second induction with daunorubicin and cytarabine alone (daunorubicin 35 mg/m2/day on Days 1 and 2, and cytarabine 1 g/m2 every 12 hours, on Day 1 to Day 3 without MYLOTARG). Patients with response received consolidation therapy with 2 courses of treatment including daunorubicin (60 mg/m2 on Day 1 of consolidation course 1; 60 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 2 of consolidation course 2) and cytarabine (1 g/m2 every 12 hours on Days 1 to 4) with or without MYLOTARG 3 mg/m2 (up to a maximum of one vial) on Day 1 according to their initial randomization. Patients who experienced remission were also eligible for allogeneic transplantation. An interval of at least 2 months between the last dose of MYLOTARG and transplantation was recommended.
The median age of the patients was 62 years (range, 50–70), 137 female and 134 male, and 88% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 to 1 at baseline. Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment arms with the exception of gender as a higher percentage of males were enrolled in the MYLOTARG arm (55%) than in the DA alone arm (44%). Overall, 59%, 65%, and 70% of patients had documented favorable/intermediate risk and 33%, 27%, and 21% had poor/adverse disease by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), European LeukemiaNet (ELN), and cytogenetic risk classifications, respectively. CD33 expression on AML blasts by flow cytometry harmonized from local laboratory results was determined in 194/271 (72%) patients overall. Few patients (14%) had low CD33 expression (less than 30% of blasts), and none had no expression of CD33.
Efficacy was established on the basis of event-free survival (EFS), measured from the date of randomization until induction failure, relapse, or death by any cause. Per protocol, induction failure was defined as failure to achieve CR or CRp in induction, and date of induction failure was defined as date of marrow evaluation after the last course of induction. Median EFS was 17.3 months in the MYLOTARG arm versus 9.5 months in the control arm; hazard ratio (HR) 0.56 (95% CI: 0.42–0.76); 2-sided p less than 0.001 by log-rank test.
In an exploratory analysis of EFS defined as failure to achieve CR in induction, relapse, or death from any cause and using the date of randomization as the date of induction failure, median EFS was 13.6 months for MYLOTARG + DA and 8.8 months for DA with HR 0.68 (95% CI: 0.51–0.91).
The Kaplan-Meier plot for per-protocol EFS is shown in Figure 1. There was no statistically significant difference between treatment arms in overall survival.
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier Plot of Event-Free Survival (mITT Population) ALFA-0701 Trial
Abbreviations: C=cytarabine; D=daunorubicin; GO=gemtuzumab ozogamicin; mITT=modified intent-to-treat.
Study AAML0531
MYLOTARG in combination with chemotherapy was evaluated in AAML0531 (NCT00372593), a multicenter, randomized study of 1,063 patients with newly-diagnosed AML ages 0 to 29 years. Patients were randomized to 5-cycle chemotherapy alone or with a single dose of MYLOTARG (3 mg/m2/dose) administered once on Day 6 in Induction 1 and once on Day 7 in Intensification 2. All patients proceeded to Induction 2 regardless of remission status after Induction 1. In the absence of active disease, a neutrophil count (ANC) >1 Gi/L and a platelet count >75 Gi/L was recommended before proceeding with subsequent cycles of therapy. Patients not in remission after Induction 2 discontinued protocol therapy permanently. All other patients proceeded to Intensification 1. Patients with high- and intermediate-risk disease with 5/6 or 6/6 matched family donors (MFD) proceeded to HSCT following Intensification 1. Patients with high-risk disease proceeded to HSCT with an alternative donor if no MFD was available. All patients with low-risk disease and any high- and intermediate-risk patients without appropriate donors proceeded with Intensification 2 with or without MYLOTARG according to their initial randomization, followed by Intensification 3. All patients in remission were to proceed on to Intensification 2 or allogeneic HSCT. In Intensification 2, patients received MYLOTARG according to the initial randomization. Patients in remission after Intensification 2 proceeded to Intensification 3.
There were 532 patients randomized to treatment with MYLOTARG + chemotherapy and 531 to chemotherapy alone. Overall, 94% of patients were <18 years of age, and 6% were adults; median age was 9.0 years (range: 0–29 years). The patients were 49% male, 51% female, 73% White, 11% Black, 5% Asian, 11% other or missing race, and 18% Hispanic. The proportion of patients in each disease risk group: low risk (23% vs 23%), intermediate risk (57% vs 57%), and high risk (15% vs 17%).
Supportive evidence of efficacy was provided by event-free survival (EFS), measured from the date of study entry until induction failure, relapse, or death by any cause. Induction failure was defined as failure to achieve CR by the end of Induction 2 period, and date of induction failure was defined as Day 1 on study. The EFS hazard ratio was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.71–0.99). The estimated percentage of patients free of induction failure, relapse, or death at five years was 48% (95% CI: 43%–52%) in the MYLOTARG + chemotherapy arm versus 40% (95% CI: 36%–45%) in the chemotherapy alone arm.
The Kaplan-Meier plot for EFS is shown in Figure 2. No difference between treatment arms in overall survival was demonstrated.
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier Plot of Event-Free Survival (Full Analysis Set) Study AAML0531 Trial
Abbreviations: GO=gemtuzumab ozogamicin.
Study AML-19
MYLOTARG single-agent therapy was evaluated in Study AML-19 (NCT00091234), a multicenter, randomized, open-label Phase 3 study comparing MYLOTARG to best supportive care (BSC) for patients with newly-diagnosed AML who were a) greater than 75 years of age or b) 61 to 75 years of age with a World Health Organization performance status (WHO PS) greater than 2 or were unwilling to receive intensive chemotherapy. Patients were randomized 1:1 and stratified by age (61–75 vs 76–80 years vs ≥81 years), CD33 positivity of bone marrow blasts (less than 20 % vs 20–80% vs greater than 80% vs unknown), initial white blood cell count (less than 30 vs greater than or equal to 30 × 109/L), WHO PS (0–1 vs 2 vs 3–4), and institution.
During induction, MYLOTARG 6 mg/m2 was given on Day 1 and MYLOTARG 3 mg/m2 was given on Day 8. Patients with no evidence of disease progression or significant toxicities after MYLOTARG induction received continuation therapy as outpatients with up to 8 courses of treatment including MYLOTARG 2 mg/m2 on Day 1 every 4 weeks. Patients continued therapy if they did not experience significant toxicities, relapse, or disease progression. BSC included standard supportive care measures and hydroxyurea or other anti-metabolites for palliative purposes.
In total, 118 patients were randomized to treatment with MYLOTARG and 119 patients to BSC. Overall, the median age of patients was 77 years (range, 62–88 years), and most patients (65%) had a WHO PS of 0 to 1 at baseline. Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment arms with the exception of gender and cytogenetics. Compared to the BSC arm, the MYLOTARG arm had a higher percentage of females (52% vs 39%) and patients with favorable/intermediate risk cytogenetics (50% vs 38%). The proportion with adverse cytogenetics was similar between arms (28% vs 27%). Fewer patients on the MYLOTARG arm had missing cytogenetics data (22% vs 35%). CD33 expression on AML blasts by flow cytometry at a centralized location was determined in 235/237 (99%) patients; 10% had CD33 expression less than 20%.
The efficacy of MYLOTARG was established on the basis of improvement in overall survival (OS). The hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.53–0.90) (2-sided p=0.005 by log-rank test). Median OS was 4.9 months in the MYLOTARG arm versus 3.6 months in the control arm.
Study MyloFrance-1
The efficacy of MYLOTARG as a single agent was evaluated in MyloFrance-1 a phase 2, single-arm, open-label study in adults with CD33-positive AML in first relapse. Patients with secondary leukemia or a prior autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation were excluded. Study treatment included a single course of MYLOTARG 3 mg/m2 on Days 1, 4, and 7. Consolidation therapy consisted of cytarabine intravenously every 12 hours for 3 days. The cytarabine dose was 3 g/m2 for patients less than 55 years old and 1 g/m2 for patients 55 years or older and/or patients with a creatinine clearance below 50 mL/minute. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was allowed after treatment with MYLOTARG, but it was recommended to delay HSCT by at least 90 days following MYLOTARG.
There were 57 patients treated with MYLOTARG. Overall, the median age of patients was 64 years (range 22–80 years). The median duration of first remission was 10 months. Forty-four (78%) patients had intermediate-risk and 12 (22%) poor-risk cytogenetics.
The efficacy of MYLOTARG was established on the basis of complete remission (CR) rate and duration of remission. Fifteen (26%; 95% CI 16% – 40%) patients achieved CR following a single course of MYLOTARG. Median relapse-free survival, measured from the first documentation of CR to the date of relapse or death, was 11.6 months.
Hepatotoxicity, Including Veno-occlusive Liver Disease (VOD)
Inform patients that liver problems, including severe, life-threatening, or fatal VOD may develop during MYLOTARG treatment. Prior to receiving MYLOTARG, inform patients who previously received, or will receive an HSCT that they may be at increased risk for developing VOD. Inform patients that the risk of developing VOD after an allogeneic HSCT is increased after receiving treatment with MYLOTARG. Inform patients that signs or symptoms of liver toxicity, including rapid weight gain, right upper quadrant pain and tenderness, hepatomegaly, and ascites should be monitored regularly during treatment, but these symptoms may not identify all patients at risk or prevent the complications of liver toxicity. Inform patients that liver problems may require dosing interruption or permanent discontinuation of MYLOTARG [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)].
Hemorrhage
Inform patients that decreased platelet counts, which may be life-threatening, may develop during MYLOTARG treatment and that complications associated with decreased platelet counts may include bleeding/hemorrhage events, which may be life-threatening or fatal. Inform patients to report signs and symptoms of bleeding/hemorrhage during treatment with MYLOTARG. Inform patients that severe bleeding/hemorrhage may require dosing interruption or permanent discontinuation of MYLOTARG [see Warnings and Precautions (5.3)].
Infusion-Related Reactions
Advise patients to contact their health care provider if they experience signs and symptoms of infusion-related reactions, including symptoms such as fever, chills, rash, or breathing problems [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)].
Embryo-Fetal Toxicity
Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to the fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to inform their healthcare provider of a known or suspected pregnancy [see Warnings and Precautions (5.6), Use in Specific Populations (8.1)].
Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with MYLOTARG and for at least 6 months after the last dose [see Use in Specific Populations (8.3)].
Advise males with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with MYLOTARG and for at least 3 months after the last dose [see Use in Specific Populations (8.3)].
Lactation
Advise women not to breastfeed during treatment with MYLOTARG and for at least 1 month after the final dose [see Use in Specific Populations (8.2)].
Infertility
Advise males and females of reproductive potential that MYLOTARG may impair fertility [see Use in Specific Populations (8.3)].
This product's labeling may have been updated. For the most recent prescribing information, please visit www.mylotarg.com.
US License No. 003
LAB-0868-5.0