- Reconstitute two 100 Unit vials of BOTOX, each with 6 mL of preservative-free 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP and mix the vials gently.
- Draw 4 mL from each vial into each of two 10 mL syringes. Draw the remaining 2 mL from each vial into a third 10 mL syringe for a total of 4 mL in each syringe.
- Complete the reconstitution by adding 6 mL of preservative-free 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP into each of the 10 mL syringes, and mix gently. This will result in three 10 mL syringes each containing 10 mL (~67 Units in each), for a total of 200 Units of reconstituted BOTOX.
- Use immediately after reconstitution in the syringe. Dispose of any unused saline.
Reconstituted BOTOX (200 Units/30 mL) is injected into the detrusor muscle via a flexible or rigid cystoscope, avoiding the trigone. The bladder should be instilled with enough saline to achieve adequate visualization for the injections, but over-distension should be avoided.
The injection needle should be filled (primed) with approximately 1 mL of reconstituted BOTOX prior to the start of injections (depending on the needle length) to remove any air.
The needle should be inserted approximately 2 mm into the detrusor, and 30 injections of 1 mL (~6.7 Units) each (total volume of 30 mL) should be spaced approximately 1 cm apart (see Figure 1). For the final injection, approximately 1 mL of sterile normal saline should be injected so that the remaining BOTOX in the needle is delivered to the bladder. After the injections are given, the saline used for bladder wall visualization should be drained. The patient should be observed for at least 30 minutes post-injection.
Patients should be considered for re-injection when the clinical effect of the previous injection diminishes (median time to qualification for re-treatment in the double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studies was 295-337 days [42-48 weeks] for BOTOX 200 Units), but no sooner than 12 weeks from the prior bladder injection.
Upper Limb Spasticity
In clinical trials, doses ranging from 75 Units to 400 Units were divided among selected muscles (see Table 3 and Figure 2) at a given treatment session.
Table 3: BOTOX Dosing by Muscle for Upper Limb Spasticity
| Muscle | Recommended Dose Total Dosage (Number of Sites) |
| Biceps Brachii
| 100 Units-200 Units divided in 4 sites
|
| Flexor Carpi Radialis
| 12.5 Units-50 Units in 1 site
|
| Flexor Carpi Ulnaris
| 12.5 Units-50 Units in 1 site
|
| Flexor Digitorum Profundus
| 30 Units-50 Units in 1 site
|
| Flexor Digitorum Sublimis
| 30 Units-50 Units in 1 site
|
| Adductor Pollicis
| 20 Units in 1 site
|
| Flexor Pollicis Longus
| 20 Units in 1 site
|
Figure 2: Injection Sites for Upper Limb Spasticity
Lower Limb Spasticity
The recommended dose for treating lower limb spasticity is 300 Units to 400 Units divided among 5 muscles (gastrocnemius, soleus, tibialis posterior, flexor hallucis longus and flexor digitorum longus) (see Table 4 and Figure 3).
Table 4: BOTOX Dosing by Muscle for Lower Limb Spasticity
| Muscle | Recommended Dose Total Dosage (Number of Sites) |
| Gastrocnemius medial head
| 75 Units divided in 3 sites
|
| Gastrocnemius lateral head
| 75 Units divided in 3 sites
|
| Soleus
| 75 Units divided in 3 sites
|
| Tibialis Posterior
| 75 Units divided in 3 sites
|
| Flexor hallucis longus
| 50 Units divided in 2 sites
|
| Flexor digitorum longus
| 50 Units divided in 2 sites
|
Figure 3: Injection Sites for Lower Limb Spasticity
Instructions for the Minor's Iodine-Starch Test Procedure:
Patients should shave underarms and abstain from use of over-the-counter deodorants or antiperspirants for 24 hours prior to the test. Patient should be resting comfortably without exercise, hot drinks for approximately 30 minutes prior to the test. Dry the underarm area and then immediately paint it with iodine solution. Allow the area to dry, then lightly sprinkle the area with starch powder. Gently blow off any excess starch powder. The hyperhidrotic area will develop a deep blue-black color over approximately 10 minutes.
Each injection site has a ring of effect of up to approximately 2 cm in diameter. To minimize the area of no effect, the injection sites should be evenly spaced as shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4: Injection Pattern for Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis
Each dose is injected to a depth of approximately 2 mm and at a 45° angle to the skin surface, with the bevel side up to minimize leakage and to ensure the injections remain intradermal. If injection sites are marked in ink, do not inject BOTOX directly through the ink mark to avoid a permanent tattoo effect.
Overactive Bladder
In double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in patients with OAB, the proportion of subjects who initiated clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) for urinary retention following treatment with BOTOX or placebo is shown in Table 7. The duration of post-injection catheterization for those who developed urinary retention is also shown.
Table 7: Proportion of Patients Catheterizing for Urinary Retention and Duration of Catheterization Following an Injection in Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trials in OAB
Timepoint | BOTOX 100 Units (N=552) | Placebo (N=542) |
| Proportion of Patients Catheterizing for Urinary Retention |
| At any time during complete treatment cycle
| 6.5% (n=36)
| 0.4% (n=2)
|
| Duration of Catheterization for Urinary Retention (Days) |
| Median
| 63
| 11
|
| Min, Max
| 1, 214
| 3, 18
|
Patients with diabetes mellitus treated with BOTOX were more likely to develop urinary retention than those without diabetes, as shown in Table 8.
Table 8. Proportion of Patients Experiencing Urinary Retention Following an Injection in Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trials in OAB According to History of Diabetes Mellitus
| Patients with Diabetes | Patients without Diabetes |
BOTOX 100 Units (N=81) | Placebo (N=69) | BOTOX 100 Units (N=526) | Placebo (N=516) |
| Urinary retention
| 12.3% (n=10)
| 0
| 6.3% (n=33)
| 0.6% (n=3)
|
Detrusor Overactivity associated with a Neurologic Condition
In two double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in patients with detrusor overactivity associated with a neurologic condition (NDO-1 and NDO-2), the proportion of subjects who were not using clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) prior to injection and who subsequently required catheterization for urinary retention following treatment with BOTOX 200 Units or placebo is shown in Table 9. The duration of post-injection catheterization for those who developed urinary retention is also shown.
Table 9: Proportion of Patients Not Using CIC at Baseline and then Catheterizing for Urinary Retention and Duration of Catheterization Following an Injection in Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trials
| Timepoint | BOTOX 200 Units (N=108) | Placebo (N=104) |
| Proportion of Patients Catheterizing for Urinary Retention |
| At any time during complete treatment cycle
| 30.6% (n=33)
| 6.7% (n=7)
|
| Duration of Catheterization for Urinary Retention (Days) |
| Median
| 289
| 358
|
| Min, Max
| 1, 530
| 2, 379
|
Among patients not using CIC at baseline, those with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) were more likely to require CIC post-injection than those with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) (see Table 10).
Table 10: Proportion of Patients by Etiology (MS and SCI) Not Using CIC at Baseline and then Catheterizing for Urinary Retention Following an Injection in Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trials
| Timepoint | MS | SCI |
BOTOX 200 Units (N=86) | Placebo (N=88) | BOTOX 200 Units (N=22) | Placebo (N=16) |
| At any time during complete treatment cycle
| 31% (n=27)
| 5% (n=4)
| 27% (n=6)
| 19% (n=3)
|
A placebo-controlled, double-blind post-approval 52 week study with BOTOX 100 Units (Study NDO-3) was conducted in non-catheterizing MS patients with urinary incontinence due to detrusor overactivity associated with a neurologic condition. Catheterization for urinary retention was initiated in 15.2% (10/66) of patients following treatment with BOTOX 100 Units versus 2.6% (2/78) on placebo at any time during the complete treatment cycle. The median duration of post-injection catheterization for those who developed urinary retention was 64 days for BOTOX 100 Units and 2 days for placebo.
Overactive Bladder
Table 11 presents the most frequently reported adverse reactions in double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials for overactive bladder occurring within 12 weeks of the first BOTOX treatment.
Table 11: Adverse Reactions Reported by ≥2% of BOTOX treated Patients and More Often than in Placebo-treated Patients Within the First 12 Weeks after Intradetrusor Injection, in Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trials in Patients with OAB
|
Adverse Reactions | BOTOX 100 Units (N=552) | Placebo (N=542) |
Urinary tract infection Dysuria Urinary retention Bacteriuria Residual urine volume*
| 99 (18%) 50 (9%) 31 (6%) 24 (4%) 17 (3%)
| 30 (6%) 36 (7%) 2 (0%) 11 (2%) 1 (0%)
|
A higher incidence of urinary tract infection was observed in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with BOTOX 100 Units and placebo than in patients without diabetes, as shown in Table 12.
Table 12: Proportion of Patients Experiencing Urinary Tract Infection following an Injection in Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trials in OAB according to history of Diabetes Mellitus
| Patients with Diabetes | Patients without Diabetes |
BOTOX 100 Units (N=81) | Placebo (N=69) | BOTOX 100 Units (N=526) | Placebo (N=516) |
| Urinary tract infection (UTI)
| 25 (31%)
| 8 (12%)
| 135 (26%)
| 51 (10%)
|
The incidence of UTI increased in patients who experienced a maximum post-void residual (PVR) urine volume
≥200 mL following BOTOX injection compared to those with a maximum PVR <200 mL following BOTOX injection, 44% versus 23%, respectively.
No change was observed in the overall safety profile with repeat dosing during an open-label, uncontrolled extension trial.
Detrusor Overactivity associated with a Neurologic Condition
Table 13 presents the most frequently reported adverse reactions in the two Phase 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (NDO-1 and NDO-2) within 12 weeks of injection for patients with detrusor overactivity associated with a neurologic condition treated with BOTOX 200 Units.
Table 13: Adverse Reactions Reported by
≥2% of BOTOX treated Patients and More Frequent than in Placebo-treated Patients Within the First 12 Weeks after Intradetrusor Injection in Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trials (NDO-1 and NDO-2)
Adverse Reactions | BOTOX 200 Units (N=262) | Placebo (N=272) |
Urinary tract infection Urinary retention Hematuria
| 64 (24%) 45 (17%) 10 (4%)
| 47 (17%) 8 (3%) 8 (3%)
|
The following adverse reactions with BOTOX 200 Units were reported at any time following initial injection and prior to re-injection or study exit (median duration of exposure was 44 weeks): urinary tract infections (49%), urinary retention (17%), constipation (4%), muscular weakness (4%), dysuria (4%), fall (3%), gait disturbance (3%), and muscle spasm (2%).
In the Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients enrolled in the double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, the MS exacerbation annualized rate (i.e., number of MS exacerbation events per patient-year) was 0.23 for BOTOX and 0.20 for placebo.
No change was observed in the overall safety profile with repeat dosing.
Table 14 presents the most frequently reported adverse reactions in a placebo-controlled, double-blind post-approval 52 week study with BOTOX 100 Units (Study NDO-3) conducted in MS patients with urinary incontinence due to detrusor overactivity associated with a neurologic condition. These patients were not adequately managed with at least one anticholinergic agent and not catheterized at baseline. The table below presents the most frequently reported adverse reactions within 12 weeks of injection.
Table 14: Adverse Reactions Reported by >2% of BOTOX treated Patients and More Frequent than in Placebo-treated Patients Within the First 12 Weeks after Intradetrusor Injection (NDO-3)
|
Adverse Reactions | BOTOX 100 Unit (N=66) | Placebo (N=78) |
Urinary tract infection Bacteriuria Urinary retention Dysuria Residual urine volume*
| 17 (26%) 6 (9%) 10 (15%) 3 (5%) 11 (17%)
| 5 (6%) 4 (5%) 1 (1%) 1 (1%) 1 (1%)
|
The following adverse events with BOTOX 100 Units were reported at any time following initial injection and prior to re-injection or study exit (median duration of exposure was 51 weeks): urinary tract infections (39%), bacteriuria (18%), urinary retention (17%), residual urine volume* (17%), dysuria (9%), and hematuria (5%).
No difference in the MS exacerbation annualized rate (i.e., number of MS exacerbating events per patient-year) was observed (BOTOX =0, placebo =0.07).
Chronic Migraine
In double-blind, placebo-controlled chronic migraine efficacy trials (Study 1 and Study 2), the discontinuation rate was 12% in the BOTOX treated group and 10% in the placebo-treated group. Discontinuations due to an adverse event were 4% in the BOTOX group and 1% in the placebo group. The most frequent adverse events leading to discontinuation in the BOTOX group were neck pain, headache, worsening migraine, muscular weakness and eyelid ptosis.
The most frequently reported adverse reactions following injection of BOTOX for chronic migraine appear in Table 15.
Table 15: Adverse Reactions Reported by
≥2% of BOTOX treated Patients and More Frequent than in Placebo-treated Patients in Two Chronic Migraine Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trials
Adverse Reactions by System Organ Class | BOTOX 155 Units-195 Units (N=687) | Placebo (N=692) |
Nervous system disorders Headache Migraine Facial paresis
| 32 (5%) 26 (4%) 15 (2%)
| 22 (3%) 18 (3%) 0 (0%)
|
Eye disorders Eyelid ptosis
| 25 (4%)
| 2 (<1%)
|
Infections and Infestations Bronchitis
| 17 (3%)
| 11 (2%)
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders Neck pain Musculoskeletal stiffness Muscular weakness Myalgia Musculoskeletal pain Muscle spasms
| 60 (9%) 25 (4%) 24 (4%) 21 (3%) 18 (3%) 13 (2%)
| 19 (3%) 6 (1%) 2 (<1%) 6 (1%) 10 (1%) 6 (1%)
|
| General disorders and administration site conditions
| | |
| Injection site pain
| 23 (3%)
| 14 (2%)
|
Vascular Disorders Hypertension
| 11 (2%)
| 7 (1%)
|
Other adverse reactions that occurred more frequently in the BOTOX group compared to the placebo group at a frequency less than 1% and potentially BOTOX related include: vertigo, dry eye, eyelid edema, dysphagia, eye infection, and jaw pain. Severe worsening of migraine requiring hospitalization occurred in approximately 1% of BOTOX treated patients in Study 1 and Study 2, usually within the first week after treatment, compared to 0.3% of placebo-treated patients.
Upper Limb Spasticity
The most frequently reported adverse reactions following injection of BOTOX for adult upper limb spasticity appear in Table 16.
Table 16: Adverse Reactions Reported by ≥2% of BOTOX treated Patients and More Frequent than in Placebo-treated Patients in Adult Upper Limb Spasticity Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trials
Adverse Reactions by System Organ Class | BOTOX 251 Units- 360 Units (N=115) | BOTOX 150 Units- 250 Units (N=188) | BOTOX <150 Units (N=54) | Placebo (N=182)
|
Gastrointestinal disorder Nausea
| 3 (3%)
| 3 (2%)
| 1 (2%)
| 1 (1%)
|
General disorders and administration site conditions Fatigue
|
4 (3%)
|
4 (2%)
|
1 (2%)
|
0
|
Infections and infestations Bronchitis
| 4 (3%)
| 4 (2%)
| 0
| 2 (1%)
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders Pain in extremity Muscular weakness
|
7 (6%) 0
|
10 (5%) 7 (4%)
|
5 (9%) 1 (2%)
|
8 (4%) 2 (1%)
|
Twenty two adult patients, enrolled in double-blind placebo controlled studies, received 400 Units or higher of BOTOX for treatment of upper limb spasticity. In addition, 44 adults received 400 Units of BOTOX or higher for four consecutive treatments over approximately one year for treatment of upper limb spasticity. The type and frequency of adverse reactions observed in patients treated with 400 Units of BOTOX were similar to those reported in patients treated for upper limb spasticity with 360 Units of BOTOX.
Lower Limb Spasticity
The most frequently reported adverse reactions following injection of BOTOX for adult lower limb spasticity appear in Table 17. Two hundred thirty one patients enrolled in a double-blind placebo controlled study (Study 6) received 300 Units to 400 Units of BOTOX, and were compared with 233 patients who received placebo. Patients were followed for an average of 91 days after injection.
Table 17: Adverse Reactions Reported by
≥2% of BOTOX treated Patients and More Frequent than in Placebo-treated Patients in Adult Lower Limb Spasticity Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial (Study 6)
| Adverse Reactions | BOTOX (N=231) | Placebo (N=233) |
| Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
| | |
| Arthralgia
| 8 (3%)
| 2 (1%)
|
| Back pain
| 6 (3%)
| 4 (2%)
|
| Myalgia
| 4 (2%)
| 3 (1%)
|
| Infections and infestations
| | |
| Upper respiratory tract infection
| 4 (2%)
| 2 (1%)
|
| General disorders and administration site conditions
| | |
| Injection site pain
| 5 (2%)
| 2 (1%)
|
Cervical Dystonia
In cervical dystonia patients evaluated for safety in double-blind and open-label studies following injection of BOTOX, the most frequently reported adverse reactions were dysphagia (19%), upper respiratory infection (12%), neck pain (11%), and headache (11%).
Other events reported in 2-10% of patients in any one study in decreasing order of incidence include: increased cough, flu syndrome, back pain, rhinitis, dizziness, hypertonia, soreness at injection site, asthenia, oral dryness, speech disorder, fever, nausea, and drowsiness. Stiffness, numbness, diplopia, ptosis, and dyspnea have been reported.
Dysphagia and symptomatic general weakness may be attributable to an extension of the pharmacology of BOTOX resulting from the spread of the toxin outside the injected muscles [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2, 5.6)].
The most common severe adverse reaction associated with the use of BOTOX injection in patients with cervical dystonia is dysphagia with about 20% of these cases also reporting dyspnea [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2, 5.6)]. Most dysphagia is reported as mild or moderate in severity. However, it may be associated with more severe signs and symptoms [see Warnings and Precautions (5.6)].
Additionally, reports in the literature include a case of a female patient who developed brachial plexopathy two days after injection of 120 Units of BOTOX for the treatment of cervical dystonia, and reports of dysphonia in patients who have been treated for cervical dystonia.
Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis
The most frequently reported adverse reactions (3-10% of adult patients) following injection of BOTOX in double-blind studies included injection site pain and hemorrhage, non-axillary sweating, infection, pharyngitis, flu syndrome, headache, fever, neck or back pain, pruritus, and anxiety.
The data reflect 346 patients exposed to BOTOX 50 Units and 110 patients exposed to BOTOX 75 Units in each axilla.
Blepharospasm
In a study of blepharospasm patients who received an average dose per eye of 33 Units (injected at 3 to 5 sites) of the currently manufactured BOTOX, the most frequently reported adverse reactions were ptosis (21%), superficial punctate keratitis (6%), and eye dryness (6%).
Other events reported in prior clinical studies in decreasing order of incidence include: irritation, tearing, lagophthalmos, photophobia, ectropion, keratitis, diplopia, entropion, diffuse skin rash, and local swelling of the eyelid skin lasting for several days following eyelid injection.
In two cases of VII nerve disorder, reduced blinking from BOTOX injection of the orbicularis muscle led to serious corneal exposure, persistent epithelial defect, corneal ulceration and a case of corneal perforation. Focal facial paralysis, syncope, and exacerbation of myasthenia gravis have also been reported after treatment of blepharospasm.
Strabismus
Extraocular muscles adjacent to the injection site can be affected, causing vertical deviation, especially with higher doses of BOTOX. The incidence rates of these adverse effects in 2058 adults who received a total of 3650 injections for horizontal strabismus was 17%.
The incidence of ptosis has been reported to be dependent on the location of the injected muscles, 1% after inferior rectus injections, 16% after horizontal rectus injections and 38% after superior rectus injections.
In a series of 5587 injections, retrobulbar hemorrhage occurred in 0.3% of cases.
Risk Summary
There are no studies or adequate data from postmarketing surveillance on the developmental risk associated with use of BOTOX in pregnant women. In animal studies, administration of BOTOX during pregnancy resulted in adverse effects on fetal growth (decreased fetal weight and skeletal ossification) at clinically relevant doses, which were associated with maternal toxicity [see Data)].
In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriages in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2-4% and 15-20%, respectively. The background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated populations is unknown.
Data
Animal Data
When BOTOX (4, 8, or 16 Units/kg) was administered intramuscularly to pregnant mice or rats two times during the period of organogenesis (on gestation days 5 and 13), reductions in fetal body weight and decreased fetal skeletal ossification were observed at the two highest doses. The no-effect dose for developmental toxicity in these studies (4 Units/kg) is approximately equal to the human dose of 400 Units, on a body weight basis (Units/kg).
When BOTOX was administered intramuscularly to pregnant rats (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 4, or 8 Units/kg) or rabbits (0.063, 0.125, 0.25, or 0.5 Units/kg) daily during the period of organogenesis (total of 12 doses in rats, 13 doses in rabbits), reduced fetal body weights and decreased fetal skeletal ossification were observed at the two highest doses in rats and at the highest dose in rabbits. These doses were also associated with significant maternal toxicity, including abortions, early deliveries, and maternal death. The developmental no-effect doses in these studies of 1 Unit/kg in rats and 0.25 Units/kg in rabbits are less than the human dose of 400 Units, based on Units/kg.
When pregnant rats received single intramuscular injections (1, 4, or 16 Units/kg) at three different periods of development (prior to implantation, implantation, or organogenesis), no adverse effects on fetal development were observed. The developmental no-effect level for a single maternal dose in rats (16 Units/kg) is approximately 2 times the human dose of 400 Units, based on Units/kg.
Risk Summary
There are no data on the presence of BOTOX in human or animal milk, the effects on the breastfed infant, or the effects on milk production. The developmental and health benefits of breastfeeding should be considered along with the mother's clinical need for BOTOX and any potential adverse effects on the breastfed infant from BOTOX or from the underlying maternal conditions.
Bladder Dysfunction
Safety and effectiveness in patients below the age of 18 years have not been established.
Prophylaxis of Headaches in Chronic Migraine
Safety and effectiveness in patients below the age of 18 years have not been established.
Spasticity
Safety and effectiveness in patients below the age of 18 years have not been established.
Axillary Hyperhidrosis
Safety and effectiveness in patients below the age of 18 years have not been established.
Cervical Dystonia
Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients below the age of 16 years have not been established.
Blepharospasm and Strabismus
Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients below the age of 12 years have not been established.
Overactive Bladder
Of 1242 overactive bladder patients in placebo-controlled clinical studies of BOTOX, 41.4% were 65 years of age or older, and 14.7% were 75 years of age or older. Adverse reactions of UTI and urinary retention were more common in patients 65 years of age or older in both placebo and BOTOX groups compared to younger patients (see Table 18). Otherwise, there were no overall differences in the safety profile following BOTOX treatment between patients aged 65 years and older compared to younger patients in these studies.
Table 18: Incidence of Urinary Tract Infection and Urinary Retention according to Age Group during First Placebo-controlled Treatment, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trials in Patients with OAB
| <65 Years | 65 to 74 Years | ≥75 Years |
Adverse Reactions | BOTOX 100 Units (N=344) | Placebo (N=348) | BOTOX 100 Units (N=169) | Placebo (N=151) | BOTOX 100 Units (N=94) | Placebo (N=86) |
| Urinary tract infection
| 73 (21%)
| 23 (7%)
| 51 (30%)
| 20 (13%)
| 36 (38%)
| 16 (19%)
|
| Urinary retention
| 21 (6%)
| 2 (0.6%)
| 14 (8%)
| 0 (0%)
| 8 (9%)
| 1 (1%)
|
Observed effectiveness was comparable between these age groups in placebo-controlled clinical studies.
Carcinogenesis
Long term studies in animals have not been performed to evaluate the carcinogenic potential of BOTOX.
Mutagenesis
BOTOX was negative in a battery of in vitro (microbial reverse mutation assay, mammalian cell mutation assay, and chromosomal aberration assay) and in vivo (micronucleus assay) genetic toxicology assays.
Impairment of Fertility
In fertility studies of BOTOX (4, 8, or 16 Units/kg) in which either male or female rats were injected intramuscularly prior to mating and on the day of mating (3 doses, 2 weeks apart for males: 2 doses, 2 weeks apart for females) to untreated animals, reduced fertility was observed in males at the intermediate and high doses and in females at the high dose. The no-effect doses for reproductive toxicity (4 Units/kg in males, 8 Units/kg in females) are approximately equal to the human dose of 400 Units, on a body weight basis (Units/kg).
Upper Limb Spasticity
The efficacy of BOTOX for the treatment of upper limb spasticity was evaluated in three randomized, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (Studies 1, 2, and 3). Two additional randomized, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies for upper limb spasticity in adults also included the evaluation of the efficacy of BOTOX for the treatment of thumb spasticity (Studies 4 and 5).
Study 1 included 126 patients (64 BOTOX and 62 placebo) with upper limb spasticity (Ashworth score of at least 3 for wrist flexor tone and at least 2 for finger flexor tone) who were at least 6 months post-stroke. BOTOX (a total dose of 200 Units to 240 Units) and placebo were injected intramuscularly (IM) into the flexor digitorum profundus, flexor digitorum sublimis, flexor carpi radialis, flexor carpi ulnaris, and if necessary into the adductor pollicis and flexor pollicis longus (see Table 25). Use of an EMG/nerve stimulator was recommended to assist in proper muscle localization for injection. Patients were followed for 12 weeks.
Table 25: Study Medication Dose and Injection Sites in Study 1
Muscles Injected | Volume (mL) | BOTOX (Units) | Number of Injection Sites |
|---|
|
Wrist Flexor Carpi Radialis
| 1
| 50
| 1
|
| Flexor Carpi Ulnaris
| 1
| 50
| 1
|
Finger Flexor Digitorum Profundus
| 1
| 50
| 1
|
| Flexor Digitorum Sublimis
| 1
| 50
| 1
|
Thumb Adductor Pollicisa | 0.4
| 20
| 1
|
| Flexor Pollicis Longusa | 0.4
| 20
| 1
|
The primary efficacy variable was wrist flexors muscle tone at week 6, as measured by the Ashworth score. The Ashworth Scale is a 5-point scale with grades of 0 [no increase in muscle tone] to 4 [limb rigid in flexion or extension]. It is a clinical measure of the force required to move an extremity around a joint, with a reduction in score clinically representing a reduction in the force needed to move a joint (i.e., improvement in spasticity).
Key secondary endpoints included Physician Global Assessment, finger flexors muscle tone, and thumb flexors tone at Week 6. The Physician Global Assessment evaluated the response to treatment in terms of how the patient was doing in his/her life using a scale from -4 = very marked worsening to +4 = very marked improvement. Study 1 results on the primary endpoint and the key secondary endpoints are shown in Table 26.
Table 26: Primary and Key Secondary Endpoints by Muscle Group at Week 6 in Study 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BOTOX (N=64) | Placebo (N=62) |
| Median Change from Baseline in Wrist Flexor Muscle Tone on the Ashworth Scale†a | -2.0* | 0.0
|
| Median Change from Baseline in Finger Flexor Muscle Tone on the Ashworth Scale††b | -1.0* | 0.0
|
| Median Change from Baseline in Thumb Flexor Muscle Tone on the Ashworth Scale††c | -1.0
| -1.0
|
| Median Physician Global Assessment of Response to Treatment†† | 2.0* | 0.0
|
Study 2 compared 3 doses of BOTOX with placebo and included 91 patients [BOTOX 360 Units (N=21), BOTOX 180 Units (N=23), BOTOX 90 Units (N=21), and placebo (N=26)] with upper limb spasticity (expanded Ashworth score of at least 2 for elbow flexor tone and at least 3 for wrist flexor tone) who were at least 6 weeks post-stroke. BOTOX and placebo were injected with EMG guidance into the flexor digitorum profundus, flexor digitorum sublimis, flexor carpi radialis, flexor carpi ulnaris, and biceps brachii (see Table 27).
Table 27: Study Medication Dose and Injection Sites in Study 2 and Study 3
| Total Dose | |
Muscles Injected | BOTOX low dose (90 Units) | BOTOX mid dose (180 Units) | BOTOX high dose (360 Units) | Volume (mL) per site | Injection Sites (n) |
Wrist Flexor Carpi Ulnaris
| 10 Units
| 20 Units
| 40 Units
| 0.4
| 1
|
| Flexor Carpi Radialis
| 15 Units
| 30 Units
| 60 Units
| 0.6
| 1
|
Finger Flexor Digitorum Profundus
|
7.5 Units
|
15 Units
|
30 Units
|
0.3
|
1
|
| Flexor Digitorum Sublimis
| 7.5 Units
| 15 Units
| 30 Units
| 0.3
| 1
|
Elbow Biceps Brachii
| 50 Units
| 100 Units
| 200 Units
| 0.5
| 4
|
The primary efficacy variable in Study 2 was the wrist flexor tone at Week 6 as measured by the expanded Ashworth Scale. The expanded Ashworth Scale uses the same scoring system as the Ashworth Scale, but allows for half-point increments.
Key secondary endpoints in Study 2 included Physician Global Assessment, finger flexors muscle tone, and elbow flexors muscle tone at Week 6. Study 2 results on the primary endpoint and the key secondary endpoints at Week 6 are shown in Table 28.
Table 28: Primary and Key Secondary Endpoints by Muscle Group and BOTOX Dose at Week 6 in Study 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BOTOX low dose (90 Units) (N=21) | BOTOX mid dose (180 Units) (N=23) | BOTOX high dose (360 Units) (N=21) | Placebo (N=26) |
| Median Change from Baseline in Wrist Flexor Muscle Tone on the Ashworth Scale†b | -1.5* | -1.0* | -1.5* | -1.0
|
| Median Change from Baseline in Finger Flexor Muscle Tone on the Ashworth Scale††c | -0.5
| -0.5
| -1.0
| -0.5
|
| Median Change from Baseline in Elbow Flexor Muscle Tone on the Ashworth Scale††d | -0.5
| -1.0* | -0.5a | -0.5
|
| Median Physician Global Assessment of Response to Treatment | 1.0*
| 1.0*
| 1.0*
| 0.0
|
Study 3 compared 3 doses of BOTOX with placebo and enrolled 88 patients [BOTOX 360 Units (N=23), BOTOX 180 Units (N=23), BOTOX 90 Units (N=23), and placebo (N=19)] with upper limb spasticity (expanded Ashworth score of at least 2 for elbow flexor tone and at least 3 for wrist flexor tone and/or finger flexor tone) who were at least 6 weeks post-stroke. BOTOX and placebo were injected with EMG guidance into the flexor digitorum profundus, flexor digitorum sublimis, flexor carpi radialis, flexor carpi ulnaris, and biceps brachii (see Table 27).
The primary efficacy variable in Study 3 was wrist and elbow flexor tone as measured by the expanded Ashworth score. A key secondary endpoint was assessment of finger flexors muscle tone. Study 3 results on the primary endpoint at Week 4 are shown in Table 29.
Table 29: Primary and Key Secondary Endpoints by Muscle Group and BOTOX Dose at Week 4 in Study 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BOTOX low dose (90 Units) (N=23) | BOTOX mid dose (180 Units) (N=21) | BOTOX high dose (360 Units) (N=22) | Placebo (N=19)
|
| Median Change from Baseline in Wrist Flexor Muscle Tone on the Ashworth Scale†b | -1.0
| -1.0
| -1.5* | -0.5
|
| Median Change from Baseline in Finger Flexor Muscle Tone on the Ashworth Scale††c | -1.0
| -1.0
| -1.0* | -0.5
|
| Median Change from Baseline in Elbow Flexor Muscle Tone on the Ashworth Scale†d | -0.5
| -0.5
| -1.0* | -0.5
|
Study 4 included 170 patients (87 BOTOX and 83 placebo) with upper limb spasticity who were at least 6 months post-stroke. In Study 4, patients received 20 Units of BOTOX into the adductor pollicis and flexor pollicis longus (total BOTOX dose =40 Units in thumb muscles) or placebo (see Table 30). Study 5 included 109 patients with upper limb spasticity who were at least 6 months post-stroke. In Study 5, patients received 15 Units (low dose) or 20 Units (high dose) of BOTOX into the adductor pollicis and flexor pollicis longus under EMG guidance (total BOTOX low dose =30 Units, total BOTOX high dose =40 Units), or placebo (see Table 30). The duration of follow-up in Study 4 and Study 5 was 12 weeks.
Table 30: Study Medication Dose and Injection Sites in Studies 4 and 5
| Muscles Injected | Study 4 | Study 5 | Number of Injection Sites for Studies 4 and 5 |
BOTOX (Units) | Volume (mL) | BOTOX low dose (Units) | BOTOX high dose (Units) | Volume low dose (mL) | Volume high dose (mL) |
Thumb Adductor Pollicis
| 20
| 0.4
| 15
| 20
| 0.3
| 0.4
| 1
|
| Flexor Pollicis Longus
| 20
| 0.4
| 15
| 20
| 0.3
| 0.4
| 1
|
The results of Study 4 for the change from Baseline to Week 6 in thumb flexor tone measured by modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and overall treatment response by Physician Global Assessment at week 6 are presented in Table 31. The MAS uses a similar scoring system as the Ashworth Scale.
Table 31: Efficacy Endpoints for Thumb Flexors at Week 6 in Study 4
|
|
|
| BOTOX (N=66) | Placebo (N=57) |
| Median Change from Baseline in Thumb Flexor Muscle Tone on the modified Ashworth Scale††a | -1.0* | 0.0
|
| Median Physician Global Assessment of Response to Treatment†† | 2.0* | 0.0
|
In Study 5, the results of the change from Baseline to Week 6 in thumb flexor tone measured by modified Ashworth Scale and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of functional assessment scale assessed by the physician using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale [-5 worst possible function to +5 best possible function]) are presented in Table 32.
Table 32: Efficacy Endpoints for Thumb Flexors at Week 6 in Study 5
|
|
|
|
| BOTOX low dose (30 Units) (N=14) | Placebo low dose (N=9) | BOTOX high dose (40 Units) (N=43) | Placebo high dose (N=23) |
| Median Change from Baseline in Thumb Flexor Muscle Tone on the modified Ashworth Scale†††a | -1.0
| -1.0
| -0.5* | 0.0
|
| Median Change from Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Score by Physician
†† | 1.0
| 0.0
| 2.0* | 0.0
|
Lower Limb Spasticity
The efficacy and safety of BOTOX for the treatment of lower limb spasticity was evaluated in Study 6, a randomized, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Study 6 included 468 post-stroke patients (233 BOTOX and 235 placebo) with ankle spasticity (modified Ashworth Scale ankle score of at least 3) who were at least 3 months post-stroke. A total dose of 300 Units of BOTOX or placebo were injected intramuscularly and divided between the gastrocnemius, soleus, and tibialis posterior, with optional injection into the flexor hallucis longus, flexor digitorum longus, flexor digitorum brevis, extensor hallucis, and rectus femoris (see Table 33) with up to an additional 100 Units (400 Units total dose). The use of electromyographic guidance or nerve stimulation was required to assist in proper muscle localization for injections. Patients were followed for 12 weeks.
Table 33: Study Medication Dose and Injection Sites in Study 6
Muscles Injected | BOTOX (Units) | Number of Injection Sites |
Mandatory Ankle Muscles Gastrocnemius (medial head)
| 75
| 3
|
| Gastrocnemius (lateral head)
| 75
| 3
|
| Soleus
| 75
| 3
|
| Tibialis Posterior
| 75
| 3
|
Optional Muscles Flexor Hallucis Longus
| 50
| 2
|
| Flexor Digitorum Longus
| 50
| 2
|
| Flexor Digitorum Brevis
| 25
| 1
|
| Extensor Hallucis
| 25
| 1
|
| Rectus Femoris
| 100
| 4
|
The co-primary endpoints were the average of the change from baseline in modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score at Week 4 and Week 6, and the average of the Physician Global Assessment of Response (CGI) at Week 4 and Week 6. The CGI evaluated the response to treatment in terms of how the patient was doing in his/her life using a 9-point scale from -4=very marked worsening to +4=very marked improvement).
Statistically significant between-group differences for BOTOX over placebo were demonstrated for the co-primary efficacy measures of MAS and CGI (see Table 34).
Table 34: Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoints Results in Study 6 (Intent-to-treat Population)
|
| BOTOX 300 to 400 Units (N=233) | Placebo
(N=235) |
| Mean Change from Baseline in Ankle Plantar Flexors on the modified Ashworth Scale | | |
| Week 4 and 6 Average
| -0.8* | -0.6
|
| Mean Clinical Global Impression Score by Investigator | | |
| Week 4 and 6 Average
| 0.9* | 0.7
|
Compared to placebo, significant improvements in MAS change from baseline for ankle plantar flexors (see Figure 11) and CGI (see Figure 12) were observed at Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6 for patients treated with BOTOX.
Figure 11: Modified Ashworth Scale Ankle Score for Study 6 – Mean Change from Baseline by Visit
Figure 12: Clinical Global Impression by Physician for Study 6 – Mean Scores by Visit
Swallowing, Speaking or Breathing Difficulties, or Other Unusual Symptoms
Advise patients to inform their doctor or pharmacist if they develop any unusual symptoms (including difficulty with swallowing, speaking, or breathing), or if any existing symptom worsens [see Boxed Warning and Warnings and Precautions (5.2, 5.6)].
Ability to Operate Machinery or Vehicles
Advise patients that if loss of strength, muscle weakness, blurred vision, dizziness, or drooping eyelids occur, they should avoid driving a car or engaging in other potentially hazardous activities.
Voiding Symptoms after Bladder Injections
After bladder injections for urinary incontinence, advise patients to contact their physician if they experience difficulties in voiding or burning sensation upon voiding.
Manufactured by:Allergan Pharmaceuticals Ireland a subsidiary of: Allergan, Inc. 2525 Dupont Dr. Irvine, CA 92612
© 2017 Allergan. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
Patented. www.allergan.com/patents
Irvine, CA 92612