The efficacy of LEQVIO was investigated in three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that enrolled 3457 adults with HeFH or clinical ASCVD, who were taking maximally tolerated statin therapy and who required additional LDL-C lowering. Demographics and baseline disease characteristics were balanced between the treatment arms in all trials.
LDL-C Reduction in Patients with Clinical Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Study 1 (ORION-10, NCT03399370) was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled 18-month trial in which 1561 patients with ASCVD were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous injections of either LEQVIO 284 mg (n = 781) or placebo (n = 780) on Day 1, Day 90, Day 270, and at Day 450. Patients were taking a maximally tolerated dose of statin with or without other lipid modifying therapy, and required additional LDL-C reduction. Patients were stratified by current use of statins or other lipid-modifying therapies. Patients taking PCSK9 inhibitors were excluded from the trial.
The mean age at baseline was 66 years (range: 35 to 90 years), 60% were ≥ 65 years old, 31% were women, 86% were White, 13% were Black, 1% were Asian and 14% identified as Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Forty-five percent (45%) of patients had diabetes at baseline. The mean baseline LDL-C was 105 mg/dL. At the time of randomization, 89% of patients were receiving statin therapy and 69% were receiving high-intensity statin therapy.
The primary efficacy outcome measure in Study 1 was the percent change from baseline to Day 510 in LDL-C. The difference between the LEQVIO and placebo groups in mean percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to Day 510 was -52% (95% CI: -56%, -49%; p < 0.0001). For additional results, see Table 2 and Figure 1.
Table 2: Changes in Lipid Parameters in Patients with ASCVD on Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy (Mean % Change from Baseline to Day 510 in Study 1)| Treatment Group | LDL-C | Total Cholesterol | Non-HDL-C | ApoB |
|---|
| ApoB = apolipoprotein B; CI = confidence interval; HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol |
| Day 510 (mean percentage change from baseline) |
| Placebo (n = 780) | 1 | 0 | 0 | -2 |
| LEQVIO (n = 781) | -51 | -34 | -47 | -45 |
| Difference from placebo (LS Mean) (95% CI) | -52 (-56, -49) | -33 (-35, -31) | -47 (-50, -44) | -43 (-46, -41) |
11.5% of subjects on LEQVIO and 14.6% of subjects on placebo had missing LDL-C data at primary endpoint (Day 510). Missing data were imputed using a modified control-based multiple imputation to account for treatment adherence. Percent change from baseline in LDL-C was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with fixed effect for treatment group and baseline LDL-C as a covariate. Other endpoints were analyzed using a mixed-effect model for repeated measure (MMRM) with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, interaction between treatment and visit, and baseline value. Missing data were imputed using a control-based pattern-mixture model approach.
Figure 1: Mean Percent Change from Baseline in LDL-C Over 18 Months in Patients with ASCVD on Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy (Study 1)
Figure 1: Mean Percent Change From Baseline In Ldl-c Over 18 Months In Patients With Ascvd On Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy (study 1) (Leqvio 02)
Study 2 (ORION-11, NCT03400800) was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled 18-month trial in which 1414 adults with ASCVD were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous injections of either LEQVIO 284 mg (n = 712) or placebo (n = 702) on Day 1, Day 90, Day 270, and Day 450. Patients were taking a maximally tolerated dose of statin with or without other lipid modifying therapy, and required additional LDL-C reduction. Patients were stratified by country and by current use of statins or other lipid-modifying therapies. Patients taking PCSK9 inhibitors were excluded from the trial.
The mean age at baseline was 65 years (range: 35 to 88 years), 56% were ≥ 65 years old, 25% were women, 98% were White, 1% were Black, < 1% were Asian, and 1% identified as Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Thirty-one percent (31%) of patients had diabetes at baseline. The mean baseline LDL-C was 101 mg/dL. At the time of randomization, 96% of patients were receiving statin therapy and 80% were receiving high-intensity statin therapy.
The primary efficacy outcome measure in Study 2 was the percent change from baseline to Day 510 in LDL-C. The difference between the LEQVIO and placebo groups in mean percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to Day 510 was -51% (95% CI: -54%, -47%; p < 0.0001). For additional results, see Table 3 and Figure 2.
Table 3: Changes in Lipid Parameters in Patients with ASCVD on Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy (Mean % Change from Baseline to Day 510 in Study 2)| Treatment Group | LDL-C | Total Cholesterol | Non-HDL-C | ApoB |
|---|
| ApoB = apolipoprotein B; CI = confidence interval; HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol |
| Day 510 (mean percentage change from baseline) |
| Placebo (n = 702) | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| LEQVIO (n = 712) | -46 | -28 | -42 | -39 |
| Difference from placebo (LS Mean) (95% CI) | -51 (-54, -47) | -30 (-32, -28) | -44 (-47, -41) | -40 (-42, -37) |
10.3% of subjects on LEQVIO and 8.3% of subjects on placebo had missing LDL-C data at primary endpoint (Day 510). Missing data were imputed using a modified control-based multiple imputation to account for treatment adherence. Percent change from baseline in LDL-C was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with fixed effect for treatment group and baseline LDL-C as a covariate. Other endpoints were analyzed using mixed-effect model for repeated measure (MMRM) with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, interaction between treatment and visit, and baseline value. Missing data were imputed using a control-based pattern-mixture model approach.
Figure 2: Mean Percent Change from Baseline in LDL-C Over 18 Months in Patients with ASCVD on Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy (Study 2)
Figure 2: Mean Percent Change From Baseline In Ldl-c Over 18 Months In Patients With Ascvd On Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy (study 2) (Leqvio 03)
In a pooled analysis of Study 1 and Study 2, the observed treatment effect was similar across predefined subgroups, such as sex, age, race, disease characteristics, geographic regions, presence of diabetes, body mass index, baseline LDL-C levels, and intensity of statin treatment.
Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HeFH)
Study 3 (ORION-9, NCT03397121) was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled 18-month trial in which 482 patients with HeFH were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous injections of either LEQVIO 284 mg (n = 242) or placebo (n = 240) on Day 1, Day 90, Day 270, and at Day 450. Patients with HeFH were taking a maximally tolerated dose of statin with or without other lipid modifying therapy, and required additional LDL-C reduction. The diagnosis of HeFH was made either by genotyping or clinical criteria using either the Simon Broome or WHO/Dutch Lipid Network criteria. Patients were stratified by country and by current use of statins or other lipid-modifying therapies. Patients taking PCSK9 inhibitors were excluded from the trial.
The mean age at baseline was 55 years (range: 21 to 80 years), 22% were ≥ 65 years old, 53% were women, 94% were White, 3% were Black, 3% were Asian and 3% identified as Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Ten percent (10%) of patients had diabetes at baseline. The mean baseline LDL-C was 153 mg/dL. At the time of randomization, 90% of patients were receiving statin therapy and 74% were receiving high-intensity statin therapy. Fifty-two percent (52%) of patients were treated with ezetimibe. The most commonly administered statins were atorvastatin and rosuvastatin.
The primary efficacy outcome measure in Study 3 was the percent change from baseline to Day 510 in LDL-C. The difference between the LEQVIO and placebo groups in mean percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to Day 510 was -48% (95% CI: -54%, -42%; p < 0.0001). For additional results, see Table 4 and Figure 3.
Table 4: Changes in Lipid Parameters in Patients with HeFH on Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy (Mean % Change from Baseline to Day 510 in Study 3)| Treatment Group | LDL-C | Total Cholesterol | Non-HDL-C | ApoB |
|---|
| ApoB = apolipoprotein B; CI = confidence interval; HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol |
| Day 510 (mean percentage change from baseline) |
| Placebo (n = 240) | 8 | 7 | 7 | 3 |
| LEQVIO (n = 242) | -40 | -25 | -35 | -33 |
| Difference from placebo (LS Mean) (95% CI) | -48 (-54, -42) | -32 (-36, -28) | -42 (-47, -37) | -36 (-40, -32) |
4.5% of subjects on LEQVIO and 4.6% of subjects on placebo had missing LDL-C data at primary endpoint (Day 510). Missing data were imputed using a modified control-based multiple imputation to account for treatment adherence. Percent change from baseline in LDL-C was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with fixed effect for treatment group and baseline LDL-C as a covariate. Other endpoints were analyzed using mixed-effect model for repeated measure (MMRM) with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, interaction between treatment and visit, and baseline value as a covariate. Missing data were imputed using a control-based pattern-mixture model approach.
Figure 3: Mean Percent Change from Baseline in LDL-C Over 18 Months in Patients with HeFH on Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy (Study 3)
Figure 3: Mean Percent Change From Baseline In Ldl-c Over 18 Months In Patients With Hefh On Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy (study 3) (Leqvio 04)