Adults
A total of 191 patients with
suspected cardiac disease and suboptimal non-contrast echocardiography
received Lumason in three multi-center controlled clinical trials
(76 patients in Study A, 62 patients in Study B, and 53 patients in
Study C). Among these patients, there were 127 men and 64 women. The
mean age was 59 years (range 22 to 96 years). The racial and ethnic
representations were 79% White, 16% Black, 4% Hispanic, < 1% Asian,
and < 1% other racial or ethnic groups. The mean weight was 204
lbs (range 92 to 405 lbs). Approximately 20% of the patients had a
chronic pulmonary disorder and 30% had a history of heart failure.
Of the 106 patients for whom a New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification
of heart failure was assigned, 49% were Class I, 33% were Class II,
and 18% were Class III. Patients with NYHA Class IV heart failure
were not included in these studies.
In Studies A and B, each patient received
four intravenous bolus injections of Lumason (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 mL),
in randomized order. In Study C, each patient received two doses of
Lumason (1 mL and 2 mL) in randomized order. All three studies assessed
endocardial border delineation and left ventricular opacification.
For each patient in each study, echocardiography with Lumason was
compared to non-contrast (baseline) echocardiography. A recording
of 2D echocardiography was obtained from 30 seconds prior to each
injection to at least 15 minutes after dosing or until the disappearance
of the contrast effect, whichever was longer. Contrast and non-contrast
echocardiographic images for each patient were evaluated by two independent
reviewers, who were blinded to clinical information and the Lumason
dose. Evaluation of left ventricular endocardial border consisted
of segment based assessment involving six endocardial segments and
using two apical views (2- and 4 chamber views).
Endocardial Border Delineation
and Duration of Useful Contrast Effect
In all three studies, administration of Lumason
improved left ventricular endocardial border delineation. The majority
of the patients who received a 2.0 mL dose of Lumason had improvement
in endocardial border delineation manifested as visualization of at
least two additional endocardial border segments. Table 3 demonstrates
the improvement in endocardial border delineation following Lumason
administration as a reduction in percentage of patients with inadequate
border delineation in at least one pair of adjacent segments (combined
2-chamber and 4-chamber view). The results are shown by reader.
| Table 3. Reduction in Percentage of Patients with Inadequate Border
Delineation |
| Reader | Study
A N = 76 | Study
B N = 62 | Study
C N = 53 |
| Non-contrast | Lumason | Non-contrast | Lumason | Non-contrast | Lumason |
| A | 60 (79%) | 22 (33%) | 31 (50%) | 12 (19%) | 12 (23%) | 10 (19%) |
| B | 62 (82%) | 29 (37%) | 54 (87%) | 6 (10%) | 45 (85%) | 20 (38%) |
Following the first appearance
of contrast within the left ventricle the mean duration of useful
contrast effect ranged from 1.7 to 3.1 minutes.
Left Ventricular Opacification
In all three studies,
complete left ventricular opacification was observed in 52% to 80%
of the patients following administration of a 2.0-mL dose of Lumason.
The studies did not sufficiently assess the effect of Lumason upon
measures of left ventricular ejection fraction and wall motion.
Pediatric patients
Twelve pediatric
patients 9 to 17 years of age with suspected cardiac disease and suboptimal
non-contrast echocardiography received Lumason in one prospective
multicenter clinical trial. Patients received Lumason at a dose of
0.03 mL/kg (mean 1.83 mL). There were 7 female, 10 white, and 2 black
patients.
For both
the non-contrast and contrast-enhanced images, standard apical 4-,
2-, and 3-chamber views with harmonic imaging were acquired. Contrast
and non-contrast images for each patient were evaluated by three independent
reviewers, who were blinded to clinical information.
Endocardial Border Delineation
Evaluation of left
ventricular endocardial border delineation consisted of segment-based
assessment of the left ventricle divided into 17 endocardial segments.
The delineation of each segment’s endocardial border was rated as
inadequate, sufficient, or good. An exam was considered suboptimal
if any of the patient’s apical views had 2 or more adjacent segments
with inadequate delineation scores.
The majority of screened patients had adequate
delineation of the left ventricular endocardial border without administration
of contrast. The number of patients with inadequate left ventricular
endocardial border delineation without contrast and after Lumason
are shown for the 12 patients, by reader, in Table 4.
a Reader A had missing
segment data with contrast echocardiography for one patient; b Reader B had missing segment data with
non-contrast echocardiography for one patient; bb Reader B had missing segment data with contrast
echocardiography for three patients; c Reader C had missing segment data with contrast echocardiography
for one patient |
| Table 4. Number of Pediatric Patients with Inadequate Border Delineation
with and without Lumason |
| Reader A | Reader B | Reader C |
| Non-contrast | 12/12 | 11/11b | 2/12 |
| Lumason | 1/11a | 0/9bb | 0/11c |
Left Ventricular
Opacification
Complete left ventricular opacification
was observed in all the patients by all 3 readers following administration
of Lumason.