Monotherapy
In 10 double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials, 2,396 patients with primary hyperlipidemia (age range 9 to 86 years; 50% female, 90% White, 5% Black or African American, 2% Asian, 3% other races; 3% identified as Hispanic or Latino ethnicity) and elevated LDL-C were treated with ezetimibe 10 mg daily for a median treatment duration of 12 weeks (range 0 to 39 weeks).
Adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients treated with ezetimibe and at an incidence greater than placebo in placebo-controlled studies of ezetimibe are shown in
Table 1.
TABLE 1: Adverse Reactions Occurring ≥2% and Greater than Placebo in Ezetimibe-treated Patients| Adverse Reaction | Placebo
(%)
n = 1,159
| Ezetimibe 10 mg
(%)
n = 2,396
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | 2.5 | 4.3 |
| Diarrhea | 3.7 | 4.1 |
| Arthralgia | 2.2 | 3.0 |
| Sinusitis | 2.2 | 2.8 |
| Pain in extremity | 2.5 | 2.7 |
| Fatigue | 1.5 | 2.4 |
| Influenza | 1.5 | 2.0 |
Combination with a Statin
In 28 double-blind, controlled (placebo or active-controlled) clinical trials, 11,308 patients with primary hyperlipidemia (age range 10 to 93 years, 48% female, 85% White, 7% Black or African American, 3% Asian, 5% other races; 4% identified as Hispanic or Latino ethnicity) and elevated LDL-C were treated with ezetimibe 10 mg/day concurrently with or added to on-going statin therapy for a median treatment duration of 8 weeks (range 0 to 112 weeks).
The incidence of consecutive increased transaminases (≥3 X ULN) was higher in patients receiving ezetimibe administered with statins (1.3%) than in patients treated with statins alone (0.4%).
Adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients treated with ezetimibe + statin and at an incidence greater than statin are shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2: Adverse Reactions Occurring ≥2% in Ezetimibe-treated Patients Coadministered with a Statin and at an Incidence Greater than Statin| Adverse Reaction | All Statins*
(%)
n = 9,361
| Ezetimibe + All Statins*
(%)
n = 11,308
|
| Nasopharyngitis | 3.3 | 3.7 |
| Myalgia | 2.7 | 3.2 |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | 2.8 | 2.9 |
| Arthralgia | 2.4 | 2.6 |
| Diarrhea | 2.2 | 2.5 |
| Back pain | 2.3 | 2.4 |
| Influenza | 2.1 | 2.2 |
| Pain in extremity | 1.9 | 2.1 |
| Fatigue | 1.6 | 2.0 |
* All Statins = all doses of all statins
Combination with Fenofibrate
This clinical trial involving 625 patients with mixed dyslipidemia (age range 20 to 76 years; 44% female, 79% White, 1% Black or African American, 20% other races; 11% identified as Hispanic or Latino ethnicity) treated for up to 12 weeks and 576 patients treated for up to an additional 48 weeks evaluated coadministration of ezetimibe and fenofibrate. Incidence rates for clinically important elevations (≥3 X ULN, consecutive) in hepatic transaminase levels were 4.5% and 2.7% for fenofibrate monotherapy (n=188) and ezetimibe coadministered with fenofibrate (n=183), respectively, adjusted for treatment exposure. Corresponding incidence rates for cholecystectomy were 0.6% and 1.7% for fenofibrate monotherapy and ezetimibe coadministered with fenofibrate, respectively
[see
Drug Interactions (7)]
.
Data
Animal Data
In oral (gavage) embryo-fetal development studies of ezetimibe conducted in rats (gestation days 6 to 15) and rabbits (gestation days 7 to 19), there was no evidence of maternal toxicity or embryolethal effects at the doses tested (250, 500, 1,000 mg/kg/day). In rats, increased incidences of common fetal skeletal findings (extra pair of thoracic ribs, unossified cervical vertebral centra, shortened ribs) were observed at 1,000 mg/kg/day (~10 times the human exposure at 10 mg daily based on AUC
0-24hrfor total ezetimibe). In rabbits treated with ezetimibe, an increased incidence of extra thoracic ribs was observed at 1,000 mg/kg/day (150 times the human exposure at 10 mg daily based on AUC
0-24hrfor total ezetimibe). The animal-to-human exposure multiple for total ezetimibe at the no-observed effect level was 6 times for rat and 134 times for rabbit. Fetal exposure to ezetimibe (conjugated and unconjugated) was confirmed in subsequent placental transfer studies conducted using a maternal dose of 1,000 mg/kg/day. The fetal maternal plasma exposure ratio (total ezetimibe) was 1.5 for rats on gestation day 20 and 0.03 for rabbits on gestation day 22.
The effect of ezetimibe on prenatal and postnatal development and maternal function was evaluated in pregnant rats at doses of 100, 300 or 1,000 mg/kg/day from gestation day 6 through lactation day 21. No maternal toxicity or adverse developmental outcomes were observed up to and including the highest dose tested (17 times the human exposure at 10 mg daily based on AUC
0-24hrfor total ezetimibe).
Multiple-dose studies of ezetimibe given in combination with statins in rats and rabbits during organogenesis resulted in higher ezetimibe and statin exposures. Reproductive findings occurred at lower doses in combination therapy compared to monotherapy.
Of the 2,396 patients who received ezetimibe in clinical trials, 669 (28%) were 65 years of age and older, and 111 (5%) were 75 years of age and older. Of the 11,308 patients who received ezetimibe in combination with a statin in clinical trials, 3587 (32%) were 65 years of age and older, and 924 (8%) were 75 years of age and older
[see
Clinical Studies (14)].
No overall differences in safety or effectiveness of ezetimibe have been observed between patients 65 years of age and older and younger patients. No clinically meaningful differences in the pharmacokinetics of ezetimibe were observed in geriatric patients compared to younger adult patients
[see
Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)]
.
Absorption
After oral administration, ezetimibe is absorbed and extensively conjugated to a pharmacologically active phenolic glucuronide (ezetimibe-glucuronide). After a single 10-mg dose of ezetimibe to fasted adults, mean ezetimibe peak plasma concentrations (C
max) of 3.4 to 5.5 ng/mL were attained within 4 to 12 hours (T
max).
Ezetimibe-glucuronide mean C
maxvalues of 45 to 71 ng/mL were achieved between 1 and 2 hours (T
max). There was no substantial deviation from dose proportionality between 5 and 20 mg. The absolute bioavailability of ezetimibe cannot be determined, as the compound is virtually insoluble in aqueous media suitable for injection.
Effect of Food
Concomitant food administration (high-fat or non-fat meals) had no effect on the extent of absorption of ezetimibe when administered as ezetimibe 10-mg tablets. The C
maxvalue of ezetimibe was increased by 38% with consumption of high-fat meals.
Distribution
Ezetimibe and ezetimibe-glucuronide are highly bound (>90%) to human plasma proteins.
Elimination
Metabolism
Ezetimibe is primarily metabolized in the small intestine and liver via glucuronide conjugation (a phase II reaction) with subsequent biliary and renal excretion. Minimal oxidative metabolism (a phase I reaction) has been observed in all species evaluated. In humans, ezetimibe is rapidly metabolized to ezetimibe-glucuronide. Ezetimibe and ezetimibe-glucuronide are the major drug-derived compounds detected in plasma, constituting approximately 10 to 20% and 80 to 90% of the total drug in plasma, respectively.
Both ezetimibe and ezetimibe-glucuronide are eliminated from plasma with a half-life of approximately 22 hours for both ezetimibe and ezetimibe-glucuronide. Plasma concentration-time profiles exhibit multiple peaks, suggesting enterohepatic recycling.
Excretion
Following oral administration of
14C-ezetimibe (20 mg) to human subjects, total ezetimibe (ezetimibe + ezetimibe-glucuronide) accounted for approximately 93% of the total radioactivity in plasma. After 48 hours, there were no detectable levels of radioactivity in the plasma.
Approximately 78% and 11% of the administered radioactivity were recovered in the feces and urine, respectively, over a 10-day collection period. Ezetimibe was the major component in feces and accounted for 69% of the administered dose, while ezetimibe-glucuronide was the major component in urine and accounted for 9% of the administered dose.
Specific Populations
Geriatric Patients
In a multiple-dose trial with ezetimibe given 10 mg once daily for 10 days, plasma concentrations for total ezetimibe were about 2-fold higher in older (≥65 years) healthy subjects compared to younger subjects. However, the difference in plasma concentrations is not clinically meaningful.
Gender
In a multiple-dose trial with ezetimibe given 10 mg once daily for 10 days, plasma concentrations for total ezetimibe were slightly higher (<20%) in females than in males.
Race
Based on a meta-analysis of multiple-dose pharmacokinetic studies, there were no pharmacokinetic differences between Black and White subjects. Studies in Asian subjects indicated that the pharmacokinetics of ezetimibe were similar to those seen in White subjects.
Renal Impairment
After a single 10-mg dose of ezetimibe in patients with severe renal disease (n=8; mean CrCl ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m
2), the mean AUC values for total ezetimibe, ezetimibe-glucuronide, and ezetimibe were increased approximately 1.5-fold, compared to healthy subjects (n=9).
Hepatic Impairment
After a single 10-mg dose of ezetimibe, the mean AUC for total ezetimibe was increased approximately 1.7-fold in patients with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score 5 to 6), compared to healthy subjects. The mean AUC values for total ezetimibe and ezetimibe were increased approximately 3- to 4-fold and 5- to 6-fold, respectively, in patients with moderate (Child-Pugh score 7 to 9) or severe hepatic impairment (Child- Pugh score 10 to 15). In a 14-day, multiple-dose trial (10 mg daily) in patients with moderate hepatic impairment, the mean AUC values for total ezetimibe and ezetimibe were increased approximately 4-fold on Day 1 and Day 14 compared to healthy subjects [
see
Use in Specific Populations (8.7)].
Drug Interactions
Ezetimibe had no significant effect on a series of probe drugs (caffeine, dextromethorphan, tolbutamide, and IV midazolam) known to be metabolized by cytochrome P450 (1A2, 2D6, 2C8/9 and 3A4) in a “cocktail” trial of twelve healthy adult males. This indicates that ezetimibe is neither an inhibitor nor an inducer of these cytochrome P450 isozymes, and it is unlikely that ezetimibe will affect the metabolism of drugs that are metabolized by these enzymes.
TABLE 4: Effect of Coadministered Drugs on Total Ezetimibe| Coadministered Drug and Dosing Regimen | Total Ezetimibe
Based on 10-mg dose of ezetimibe. |
|---|
| Change in AUC | Change in C
max |
|---|
| Cyclosporine-stable dose required (75 to 150 mg BID)
Post-renal transplant patients with mild impaired or normal renal function. In a different study, a renal transplant patient with severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance of 13.2 mL/min/1.73 m
2) who was receiving multiple medications, including cyclosporine, demonstrated a 12-fold greater exposure to total ezetimibe compared to healthy subjects.
,See
Drug Interactions (7).
| ↑240% | ↑290% |
| Fenofibrate, 200 mg QD, 14 days
| ↑48% | ↑64% |
| Gemfibrozil, 600 mg BID, 7 days
| ↑64% | ↑91% |
| Cholestyramine, 4 g BID, 14 days
| ↓55% | ↓4% |
| Aluminum & magnesium hydroxide combination antacid, single dose
Supralox, 20 mL. | ↓4% | ↓30% |
| Cimetidine, 400 mg BID, 7 days | ↑6% | ↑22% |
| Glipizide, 10 mg, single dose | ↑4% | ↓8% |
| Statins | | |
| Lovastatin 20 mg QD, 7 days | ↑9% | ↑3% |
| Pravastatin 20 mg QD, 14 days | ↑7% | ↑23% |
| Atorvastatin 10 mg QD, 14 days | ↓2% | ↑12% |
| Rosuvastatin 10 mg QD, 14 days | ↑13% | ↑18% |
| Fluvastatin 20 mg QD, 14 days | ↓19% | ↑7% |
TABLE 5: Effect of Ezetimibe Coadministration on Systemic Exposure to Other Drugs| Coadministered Drug and its Dosage Regimen | Ezetimibe Dosage Regimen | Change in AUC of Coadministered Drug | Change in C
maxof Coadministered Drug
|
|---|
| Warfarin, 25-mg single dose on Day 7 | 10 mg QD, 11 days | ↓2% (R-warfarin)
↓4% (S-warfarin)
| ↑3% (R-warfarin)
↑1% (S-warfarin)
|
| Digoxin, 0.5-mg single dose | 10 mg QD, 8 days | ↑2% | ↓7% |
Gemfibrozil, 600 mg BID,
7 days
See
Drug Interactions (7).
| 10 mg QD, 7 days | ↓1% | ↓11% |
Ethinyl estradiol &
Levonorgestrel, QD,
21 days
| 10 mg QD, days 8 to 14 of 21d oral contraceptive cycle | Ethinyl estradiol
0%
Levonorgestrel
0%
| Ethinyl estradiol
↓9%
Levonorgestrel
↓5%
|
| Glipizide, 10 mg on Days 1 and 9 | 10 mg QD, days 2 to 9 | ↓3% | ↓5% |
Fenofibrate, 200 mg QD,
14 days
| 10 mg QD, 14 days | ↑11% | ↑7% |
| Cyclosporine, 100-mg single dose Day 7
| 20 mg QD, 8 days | ↑15% | ↑10% |
| Statins | | | |
Lovastatin 20 mg QD,
7 days
| 10 mg QD, 7 days | ↑19% | ↑3% |
| Pravastatin 20 mg QD, 14 days | 10 mg QD, 14 days | ↓20% | ↓24% |
| Atorvastatin 10 mg QD, 14 days | 10 mg QD, 14 days | ↓4% | ↑7% |
| Rosuvastatin 10 mg QD, 14 days | 10 mg QD, 14 days | ↑19% | ↑17% |
| Fluvastatin 20 mg QD, 14 days | 10 mg QD, 14 days | ↓39% | ↓27% |
Monotherapy
In two multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week trials in 1719 patients (age range 18 to 86 years, 52% females; 91% White, 5% Black or African American, 1% Asian, 3% other races mostly identified as Hispanic or Latino ethnicity) with primary hyperlipidemia, ezetimibe significantly lowered total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and non-HDL-C compared to placebo (see
Table 6). Reduction in LDL-C was consistent across age, sex, and baseline LDL-C.
TABLE 6: Response to Ezetimibe in Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia (Mean % Change from Untreated Baseline
Baseline- on no lipid-lowering drug.
)
| Treatment Group | N | Total-C | LDL-C | Apo B | Non-HDL-C |
|---|
| Trial1
ZETIA significantly reduced total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and non-HDL-C compared to placebo. | Placebo | 205 | +1 | +1 | -1 | +1 |
| Ezetimibe | 622 | -12 | -18 | -15 | -16 |
| Trial 2
| Placebo | 226 | +1 | +1 | -1 | +2 |
| Ezetimibe | 666 | -12 | -18 | -16 | -16 |
Pooled Data
(Trials 1 & 2)
| Placebo | 431 | 0 | +1 | -2 | +1 |
| Ezetimibe | 1288 | -13 | -18 | -16 | -16 |
Combination with Statins: Ezetimibe Added to On-going Statin Therapy
In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week trial, 769 patients (age range 22 to 85 years, 42% females; 90% White, 6% Black or African American, 1% Asian, 3% other races; and 2% identified as Hispanic or Latino ethnicity) with primary hyperlipidemia, known coronary heart disease or multiple cardiovascular risk factors who were already receiving statin monotherapy but who had not met their NCEP ATP II target LDL-C goal, were randomized to receive either ezetimibe or placebo in addition to their on-going statin.
Ezetimibe, added to on-going statin therapy, significantly lowered total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and non-HDL-C compared with a statin administered alone (see
Table 7). LDL-C reductions induced by ezetimibe were generally consistent across all statins.
TABLE 7: Response to Addition of Ezetimibe to On-Going Statin Therapy
Patients receiving each statin: 40% atorvastatin, 31% simvastatin, 29% others (pravastatin, fluvastatin, cerivastatin, lovastatin).
in Patients with Hyperlipidemia (Mean % Change from Treated Baseline
Baseline - on a statin alone.
)
| Treatment (Daily Dose) | N | Total-C | LDL-C | Apo B | Non-HDL-C |
|---|
| On-going Statin + Placebo
Ezetimibe + statin significantly reduced total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and non-HDL-C compared to statin alone. | 390 | -2 | -4 | -3 | -3 |
| On-going Statin + Ezetimibe
| 379 | -17 | -25 | -19 | -23 |
Combination with Statins: Ezetimibe Initiated Concurrently with a Statin
In four multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week trials, in 2,382 patients (age range 18 to 87 years, 57% female; 88% White, 5% Black or African American, 2% Asian, 5% other races mostly identified as Hispanic or Latino) with hyperlipidemia, ezetimibe or placebo was administered alone or with various doses of atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, or lovastatin.
When all patients receiving ezetimibe with a statin were compared to all those receiving the corresponding statin alone, ezetimibe significantly lowered total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and non-HDL-C compared to the statin administered alone. LDL-C reductions induced by ezetimibe were generally consistent across all statins. (See footnote
,
Tables 8to
11.)
TABLE 8: Response to Ezetimibe and Atorvastatin Initiated Concurrently in Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia (Mean % Change from Untreated Baseline
Baseline - on no lipid-lowering drug
)
Treatment
(Daily Dose)
| N | Total-C | LDL-C | Apo B | Non-HDL-C |
|---|
| Placebo | 60 | +4 | +4 | +3 | +4 |
| Ezetimibe | 65 | -14 | -20 | -15 | -18 |
| Atorvastatin 10 mg | 60 | -26 | -37 | -28 | -34 |
| Ezetimibe + Atorvastatin 10 mg | 65 | -38 | -53 | -43 | -49 |
| Atorvastatin 20 mg | 60 | -30 | -42 | -34 | -39 |
| Ezetimibe + Atorvastatin 20 mg | 62 | -39 | -54 | -44 | -50 |
| Atorvastatin 40 mg | 66 | -32 | -45 | -37 | -41 |
| Ezetimibe + Atorvastatin 40 mg | 65 | -42 | -56 | -45 | -52 |
| Atorvastatin 80 mg | 62 | -40 | -54 | -46 | -51 |
| Ezetimibe + Atorvastatin 80 mg | 63 | -46 | -61 | -50 | -58 |
| Pooled data (All Atorvastatin Doses)
Ezetimibe + all doses of atorvastatin pooled (10 to 80 mg) significantly reduced total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and non-HDL-C compared to all doses of atorvastatin pooled (10 to 80 mg). | 248 | -32 | -44 | -36 | -41 |
| Pooled data (All Ezetimibe + Atorvastatin Doses)
| 255 | -41 | -56 | -45 | -52 |
TABLE 9: Response to Ezetimibe and Simvastatin Initiated Concurrently in Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia (Mean % Change from Untreated Baseline
Baseline - on no lipid-lowering drug
)
Treatment
(Daily Dose)
| N | Total-C | LDL-C | Apo B | Non-HDL-C |
|---|
| Placebo | 70 | -1 | -1 | 0 | -1 |
| Ezetimibe | 61 | -13 | -19 | -14 | -17 |
| Simvastatin 10 mg | 70 | -18 | -27 | -21 | -25 |
| Ezetimibe + Simvastatin 10 mg | 67 | -32 | -46 | -35 | -42 |
| Simvastatin 20 mg | 61 | -26 | -36 | -29 | -33 |
| Ezetimibe + Simvastatin 20 mg | 69 | -33 | -46 | -36 | -42 |
| Simvastatin 40 mg | 65 | -27 | -38 | -32 | -35 |
| Ezetimibe + Simvastatin 40 mg | 73 | -40 | -56 | -45 | -51 |
| Simvastatin 80 mg | 67 | -32 | -45 | -37 | -41 |
| Ezetimibe + Simvastatin 80 mg | 65 | -41 | -58 | -47 | -53 |
| Pooled data (All Simvastatin Doses)
Ezetimibe + all doses of simvastatin pooled (10 to 80 mg) significantly reduced total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and non-HDL-C compared to all doses of simvastatin pooled (10-80 mg). | 263 | -26 | -36 | -30 | -34 |
| Pooled data (All Ezetimibe + Simvastatin Doses)
| 274 | -37 | -51 | -41 | -47 |
TABLE 10: Response to Ezetimibe and Pravastatin Initiated Concurrently in Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia (Mean % Change from Untreated Baseline
Baseline - on no lipid-lowering drug.
)
Treatment
(Daily Dose)
| N | Total-C | LDL-C | Apo B | Non-HDL-C |
|---|
| Placebo | 65 | 0 | -1 | -2 | 0 |
| Ezetimibe | 64 | -13 | -20 | -15 | -17 |
| Pravastatin 10 mg | 66 | -15 | -21 | -16 | -20 |
| Ezetimibe + Pravastatin 10 mg | 71 | -24 | -34 | -27 | -32 |
| Pravastatin 20 mg | 69 | -15 | -23 | -18 | -20 |
| Ezetimibe + Pravastatin 20 mg | 66 | -27 | -40 | -31 | -36 |
| Pravastatin 40 mg | 70 | -22 | -31 | -26 | -28 |
| Ezetimibe + Pravastatin 40 mg | 67 | -30 | -42 | -32 | -39 |
| Pooled data (All Pravastatin Doses)
ZETIA + all doses of pravastatin pooled (10–40 mg) significantly reduced total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and non-HDL-C compared to all doses of pravastatin pooled (10–40 mg). | 205 | -17 | -25 | -20 | -23 |
| Pooled data (All Ezetimibe + Pravastatin Doses)
| 204 | -27 | -39 | -30 | -36 |
TABLE 11: Response to Ezetimibe and Lovastatin Initiated Concurrently in Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia (Mean % Change from Untreated Baseline
Baseline - on no lipid-lowering drug.
)
Treatment
(Daily Dose)
| N | Total-C | LDL-C | Apo B | Non-HDL-C |
|---|
| Placebo | 64 | +1 | 0 | +1 | +1 |
| Ezetimibe | 72 | -13 | -19 | -14 | -16 |
| Lovastatin 10 mg | 73 | -15 | -20 | -17 | -19 |
| Ezetimibe + Lovastatin 10 mg | 65 | -24 | -34 | -27 | -31 |
| Lovastatin 20 mg | 74 | -19 | -26 | -21 | -24 |
| Ezetimibe + Lovastatin 20 mg | 62 | -29 | -41 | -34 | -39 |
| Lovastatin 40 mg | 73 | -21 | -30 | -25 | -27 |
| Ezetimibe + Lovastatin 40 mg | 65 | -33 | -46 | -38 | -43 |
| Pooled data (All Lovastatin Doses)
ZETIA + all doses of lovastatin pooled (10–40 mg) significantly reduced total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and non-HDL-C compared to all doses of lovastatin pooled (10–40 mg). | 220 | -18 | -25 | -21 | -23 |
| Pooled data (All Ezetimibe + Lovastatin Doses)
| 192 | -29 | -40 | -33 | -38 |
Combination with Fenofibrate
In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia, 625 patients (age range 20 to 76 years, 44% female; 79% White, 1% Black or African American, 20% other races; and 11% identified as Hispanic or Latino ethnicity) were treated for up to 12 weeks and 576 for up to an additional 48 weeks. Patients were randomized to receive placebo, ezetimibe alone, 160 mg fenofibrate alone, or ezetimibe and 160 mg fenofibrate in the 12-week trial. After completing the 12-week trial, eligible patients were assigned to ezetimibe coadministered with fenofibrate or fenofibrate monotherapy for an additional 48 weeks.
Ezetimibe coadministered with fenofibrate significantly lowered total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and non-HDL-C compared to fenofibrate administered alone (see
Table 12).
TABLE 12: Response to Ezetimibe and Fenofibrate Initiated Concurrently in Patients with Mixed Hyperlipidemia (Mean % Change from Untreated Baseline
Baseline - on no lipid-lowering drug.
at 12 weeks)
Treatment
(Daily Dose)
| N | Total-C | LDL-C | Apo B | Non-HDL-C |
|---|
| Placebo | 63 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 |
| Ezetimibe | 185 | -12 | -13 | -11 | -15 |
| Fenofibrate 160 mg | 188 | -11 | -6 | -15 | -16 |
Ezetimibe + Fenofibrate
160 mg
| 183 | -22 | -20 | -26 | -30 |
The changes in lipid endpoints after an additional 48 weeks of treatment with ezetimibe coadministered with fenofibrate or with fenofibrate alone were consistent with the 12-week data displayed above.
HeFH in Pediatric Patients
The effects of ezetimibe coadministered with simvastatin (n=126) compared to simvastatin monotherapy (n=122) have been evaluated in males and females with HeFH. In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled trial followed by an open-label phase, 142 males and 106 postmenarchal females, 10 to 17 years of age (mean age 14.2 years, 43% females, 82% White, 4% Asian, 2% Black or African American, 13% multi- racial; 14% identified as Hispanic or Latino ethnicity) with HeFH were randomized to receive either ezetimibe coadministered with simvastatin or simvastatin monotherapy. Inclusion in the trial required 1) a baseline LDL-C level between 160 and 400 mg/dL and 2) a medical history and clinical presentation consistent with HeFH. The mean baseline LDL-C value was 225 mg/dL (range: 161 to 351 mg/dL) in the ezetimibe coadministered with simvastatin group compared to 219 mg/dL (range: 149 to 336 mg/dL) in the simvastatin monotherapy group. The patients received coadministered ezetimibe and simvastatin (10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg) or simvastatin monotherapy (10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg) for 6 weeks, coadministered ezetimibe and 40-mg simvastatin or 40-mg simvastatin monotherapy for the next 27 weeks, and open-label coadministered ezetimibe and simvastatin (10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg) for 20 weeks thereafter.
The results of the trial at Week 6 are summarized in
Table 13.Results at Week 33 were consistent with those at Week 6.
TABLE 13: Mean Percent Difference at Week 6 Between the Pooled Ezetimibe Coadministered with Simvastatin Group and the Pooled Simvastatin Monotherapy Group in Adolescent Patients with HeFH | Total-C | LDL-C | Apo B | Non-HDL-C |
|---|
Mean percent difference between
treatment groups
| -12% | -15% | -12% | -14% |
| 95% Confidence Interval | (-15%, -9%) | (-18%, -12%) | (-15%, -9%) | (-17%, -11%) |
HoFH in Adults and Pediatric Patients
A trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of ezetimibe in the treatment of HoFH. This double-blind, randomized, 12-week trial enrolled 50 patients (age range 11 to 74 years, 58% female; 90% White, 2% Black or African American, 8% other races identified as Hispanic or Latino) with a clinical and/or genotypic diagnosis of HoFH, with or without concomitant LDL apheresis, already receiving atorvastatin or simvastatin (40 mg). Patients were randomized to one of three treatment groups, atorvastatin or simvastatin (80 mg), ezetimibe administered with atorvastatin or simvastatin (40 mg), or ezetimibe administered with atorvastatin or simvastatin (80 mg). Due to decreased bioavailability of ezetimibe in patients concomitantly receiving cholestyramine [
see
Drug Interactions (7)], ezetimibe was dosed at least 4 hours before or after administration of resins. Mean baseline LDL-C was 341 mg/dL in those patients randomized to atorvastatin 80 mg or simvastatin 80 mg alone and 316 mg/dL in the group randomized to ezetimibe plus atorvastatin 40 or 80 mg or simvastatin 40 or 80 mg. Ezetimibe, administered with atorvastatin or simvastatin (40- and 80-mg statin groups, pooled), significantly reduced LDL-C (21%) compared with increasing the dose of simvastatin or atorvastatin monotherapy from 40 to 80 mg (7%). In those treated with ezetimibe plus 80-mg atorvastatin or with ezetimibe plus 80-mg simvastatin, LDL-C was reduced by 27%.
Homozygous Sitosterolemia (Phytosterolemia) in Adults and Pediatric Patients
A trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of ezetimibe in the treatment of homozygous sitosterolemia. In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week trial, 37 patients (age range 9 to 72 years, 65% females; 89% White, 3% Asian, 8% other races identified as Hispanic or Latino) with homozygous sitosterolemia with elevated plasma sitosterol levels (>5 mg/dL) on their current therapeutic regimen (diet, bile-acid-binding resins, statins, ileal bypass surgery and/or LDL apheresis), were randomized to receive ezetimibe (n=30) or placebo (n=7). Due to decreased bioavailability of ezetimibe in patients concomitantly receiving cholestyramine [
see
Drug Interactions (7)], ezetimibe was dosed at least 2 hours before or 4 hours after resins were administered. Excluding the one subject receiving LDL apheresis, ezetimibe significantly lowered plasma sitosterol and campesterol, by 21% and 24% from baseline, respectively. In contrast, patients who received placebo had increases in sitosterol and campesterol of 4% and 3% from baseline, respectively. For patients treated with ezetimibe, mean plasma levels of plant sterols were reduced progressively over the course of the trial. Reductions in sitosterol and campesterol were consistent between patients taking ezetimibe concomitantly with bile acid sequestrants (n=8) and patients not on concomitant bile acid sequestrant therapy (n=21).