Ezetimibe and simvastatin
Ezetimibe and simvastatin reduces total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, TG, and non-HDL-C, and increases HDL-C in patients with hyperlipidemia. Maximal to near maximal response is generally achieved within 2 weeks and maintained during chronic therapy.
Ezetimibe and simvastatin is effective in men and women with hyperlipidemia. Experience in non-Caucasians is limited and does not permit a precise estimate of the magnitude of the effects of ezetimibe and simvastatin.
Five multicenter, double-blind studies conducted with either ezetimibe and simvastatin or co-administered ezetimibe and simvastatin equivalent to ezetimibe and simvastatin in patients with primary hyperlipidemia are reported: two were comparisons with simvastatin, two were comparisons with atorvastatin, and one was a comparison with rosuvastatin.
In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week trial, 1,528 hyperlipidemic patients were randomized to one of ten treatment groups: placebo, ezetimibe (10 mg), simvastatin (10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg), or ezetimibe and simvastatin (10/10, 10/20, 10/40, or 10/80).
When patients receiving ezetimibe and simvastatin were compared to those receiving all doses of simvastatin, ezetimibe and simvastatin significantly lowered total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, TG, and non-HDL-C. The effects of ezetimibe and simvastatin on HDL-C were similar to the effects seen with simvastatin. Further analysis showed ezetimibe and simvastatin significantly increased HDL-C compared with placebo (see Table 7). The lipid response to ezetimibe and simvastatin was similar in patients with TG levels greater than or less than 200 mg/dL.
Table 7: Response to Ezetimibe and simvastatin in Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia (Mean* % Change from Untreated Baseline
†)
Treatment (Daily Dose) | N | Total-C | LDL-C | Apo B | HDL-C | TG
* | Non-HDL- C |
Pooled data (All ezetimibe and simvastatin doses)
‡ | 609 | -38 | -53 | -42 | +7 | -24 | -49 |
Pooled data (All simvastatin doses)
‡ | 622 | -28 | -39 | -32 | +7 | -21 | -36 |
Ezetimibe 10 mg | 149 | -13 | -19 | -15 | +5 | -11 | -18 |
Placebo | 148 | -1 | -2 | 0 | 0 | -2 | -2 |
Ezetimibe and simvastatin by dose |
10/10 | 152 | -31 | -45 | -35 | +8 | -23 | -41 |
10/20 | 156 | -36 | -52 | -41 | +10 | -24 | -47 |
10/40 | 147 | -39 | -55 | -44 | +6 | -23 | -51 |
10/80 | 154 | -43 | -60 | -49 | +6 | -31 | -56 |
Simvastatin by dose |
10 mg | 158 | -23 | -33 | -26 | +5 | -17 | -30 |
20 mg | 150 | -24 | -34 | -28 | +7 | -18 | -32 |
40 mg | 156 | -29 | -41 | -33 | +8 | -21 | -38 |
80 mg | 158 | -35 | -49 | -39 | +7 | -27 | -45 |
* For triglycerides, median % change from baseline.
† Baseline - on no lipid-lowering drug.
‡ Ezetimibe and simvastatin doses pooled (10/10 to 10/80) significantly reduced total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, TG, and non-HDL-C compared to simvastatin and significantly increased HDL-C compared to placebo.
|
In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled, 23-week study, 710 patients with known CHD or CHD risk equivalents, as defined by the NCEP ATP III guidelines, and an LDL-C ≥130 mg/dL were randomized to one of four treatment groups: co-administered ezetimibe and simvastatin equivalent to ezetimibe and simvastatin (10/10, 10/20, and 10/40) or simvastatin 20 mg. Patients not reaching an LDL-C <100 mg/dL had their simvastatin dose titrated at 6-week intervals to a maximal dose of 80 mg.
At Week 5, the LDL-C reductions with ezetimibe and simvastatin 10/10, 10/20, or 10/40 were significantly larger than with simvastatin 20 mg (see Table 8).
Table 8: Response to Ezetimibe and simvastatin after 5 Weeks in Patients with CHD or CHD Risk Equivalents and an LDL-C ≥130 mg/dL
| Simvastatin 20 mg | Ezetimibe and simvastatin10/10 | Ezetimibe and simvastatin 10/20 | Ezetimibe and simvastatin 10/40 |
N | 253 | 251 | 109 | 97 |
Mean baseline LDL-C | 174 | 165 | 167 | 171 |
Percent change LDL-C | -38 | -47 | -53 | -59 |
In a multicenter, double-blind, 6-week study, 1,902 patients with primary hyperlipidemia, who had not met their NCEP ATP III target LDL-C goal, were randomized to one of eight treatment groups: ezetimibe and simvastatin (10/10, 10/20, 10/40, or 10/80) or atorvastatin (10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg).
Across the dosage range, when patients receiving ezetimibe and simvastatin were compared to those receiving milligram-equivalent statin doses of atorvastatin, ezetimibe and simvastatin lowered total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and non-HDL-C significantly more than atorvastatin. Only the 10/40 mg and 10/80 mg ezetimibe and simvastatin doses increased HDL-C significantly more than the corresponding milligram-equivalent statin dose of atorvastatin. The effects of ezetimibe and simvastatin on TG were similar to the effects seen with atorvastatin (see Table 9).
Table 9: Response to Ezetimibe and simvastatin and Atorvastatin in Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia (Mean
* % Change from Untreated Baseline
†)
Treatment (Daily Dose) | N | Total-C
‡ | LDL-C
‡ | Apo B
‡ | HDL-C | TG* | Non-HDL- C
‡ |
Ezetimibe and simvastatin by dose |
10/10 | 230 | -34
§ | -47
§ | -37
§ | +8 | -26 | -43
§ |
10/20 | 233 | -37
§ | -51
§ | -40
§ | +7 | -25 | -46
§ |
10/40 | 236 | -41
§ | -57
§ | -46
§ | +9
§ | -27 | -52
§ |
10/80 | 224 | -43
§ | -59
§ | -48
§ | +8
§ | -31 | -54
§ |
Atorvastatin by dose |
10 mg | 235 | -27 | -36 | -31 | +7 | -21 | -34 |
20 mg | 230 | -32 | -44 | -37 | +5 | -25 | -41 |
40 mg | 232 | -36 | -48 | -40 | +4 | -24 | -45 |
80 mg | 230 | -40 | -53 | -44 | +1 | -32 | -50 |
* For triglycerides, median % change from baseline.
† Baseline - on no lipid-lowering drug.
‡ Ezetimibe and simvastatin doses pooled (10/10 to 10/80) provided significantly greater reductions in total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and non-HDL-C compared to atorvastatin doses pooled (10 to 80).
§ p<0.05 for difference with atorvastatin at equal mg doses of the simvastatin component.
|
In a multicenter, double-blind, 24-week, forced-titration study, 788 patients with primary hyperlipidemia, who had not met their NCEP ATP III target LDL-C goal, were randomized to receive co-administered ezetimibe and simvastatin equivalent to ezetimibe and simvastatin (10/10 and 10/20) or atorvastatin 10 mg. For all three treatment groups, the dose of the statin was titrated at 6-week intervals to 80 mg. At each pre-specified dose comparison, ezetimibe and simvastatin lowered LDL-C to a greater degree than atorvastatin (see Table 10).
Table 10: Response to Ezetimibe and simvastatin and Atorvastatin in Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia (Mean
* % Change from Untreated Baseline
†)
Treatment | N | Total-C | LDL-C | Apo B | HDL-C | TG
* | Non-HDL- C |
Week 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atorvastatin 10 mg
‡ | 262 | -28 | -37 | -32 | +5 | -23 | -35 |
Ezetimibe and simvastatin 10/10
§ | 263 | -34
¶ | -46
¶ | -38
¶ | +8
¶ | -26 | -43
¶ |
Ezetimibe and simvastatin 10/20
# | 263 | -36
¶ | -50
¶ | -41
¶ | +10
¶ | -25 | -46
¶ |
Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atorvastatin 20 mg | 246 | -33 | -44 | -38 | +7 | -28 | -42 |
Ezetimibe and simvastatin 10/20 | 250 | -37
¶ | -50
¶ | -41
¶ | +9 | -28 | -46
¶ |
Ezetimibe and simvastatin 10/40 | 252 | -39
¶ | -54
¶ | -45
¶ | +12
¶ | -31 | -50
¶ |
Week 18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atorvastatin 40 mg | 237 | -37 | -49 | -42 | +8 | -31 | -47 |
Ezetimibe and simvastatin 10/40
Þ | 482 | -40
¶ | -56
¶ | -45
¶ | +11
¶ | -32 | -52
¶ |
Week 24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atorvastatin 80 mg | 228 | -40 | -53 | -45 | +6 | -35 | -50 |
Ezetimibe and simvastatin 10/80
Þ | 459 | -43
¶ | -59
¶ | -49
¶ | +12
¶ | -35 | -55
¶ |
* For triglycerides, median % change from baseline.
† Baseline - on no lipid-lowering drug.
‡ Atorvastatin: 10 mg start dose titrated to 20 mg, 40 mg, and 80 mg through Weeks 6, 12, 18, and 24.
§ Ezetimibe and simvastatin: 10/10 start dose titrated to 10/20, 10/40, and 10/80 through Weeks 6, 12, 18, and 24.
¶ p≤0.05 for difference with atorvastatin in the specified week.
# Ezetimibe and simvastatin: 10/20 start dose titrated to 10/40, 10/40, and 10/80 through Weeks 6, 12, 18, and 24.
Þ Data pooled for common doses of ezetimibe and simvastatin at Weeks 18 and 24.
|
In a multicenter, double-blind, 6-week study, 2,959 patients with primary hyperlipidemia, who had not met their NCEP ATP III target LDL-C goal, were randomized to one of six treatment groups: ezetimibe and simvastatin (10/20, 10/40, or 10/80) or rosuvastatin (10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg).
The effects of ezetimibe and simvastatin and rosuvastatin on total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, TG, non-HDL-C and HDL-C are shown in Table 11.
Table 11: Response to Ezetimibe and simvastatin and Rosuvastatin in Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia (Mean
* % Change from Untreated Baseline
†)
Treatment (Daily Dose) | N | Total-C
‡ | LDL-C
‡ | Apo B
‡ | HDL-C | TG
* | Non-HDL- C
‡ |
Ezetimibe and simvastatin by dose |
10/20 | 476 | -37
§ | -52
§ | -42
§ | +7 | -23
§ | -47
§ |
10/40 | 477 | -39
¶ | -55
¶ | -44
¶ | +8 | -27 | -50
¶ |
10/80 | 474 | -44
# | -61
# | -50
# | +8 | -30
# | -56
# |
Rosuvastatin by dose |
10 mg | 475 | -32 | -46 | -37 | +7 | -20 | -42 |
20 mg | 478 | -37 | -52 | -43 | +8 | -26 | -48 |
40 mg | 475 | -41 | -57 | -47 | +8 | -28 | -52 |
* For triglycerides, median % change from baseline.
† Baseline - on no lipid-lowering drug.
‡ Ezetimibe and simvastatin doses pooled (10/20 to 10/80) provided significantly greater reductions in total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and non-HDL-C compared to rosuvastatin doses pooled (10 mg to 40 mg).
§ p<0.05 vs. rosuvastatin 10 mg.
¶ p<0.05 vs. rosuvastatin 20 mg.
# p<0.05 vs. rosuvastatin 40 mg.
|
In a multicenter, double-blind, 24-week trial, 214 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with thiazolidinediones (rosiglitazone or pioglitazone) for a minimum of 3 months and simvastatin 20 mg for a minimum of 6 weeks were randomized to receive either simvastatin 40 mg or the co-administered active ingredients equivalent to ezetimibe and simvastatin 10/20. The median LDL-C and HbA1c levels at baseline were 89 mg/dL and 7.1%, respectively.
Ezetimibe and simvastatin 10/20 was significantly more effective than doubling the dose of simvastatin to 40 mg. The median percent changes from baseline for ezetimibe and simvastatin vs. simvastatin were: LDL-C -25% and -5%; total-C -16% and -5%; Apo B -19% and -5%; and non-HDL-C -23% and -5%. Results for HDL-C and TG between the two treatment groups were not significantly different.
Ezetimibe
In two multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week studies in 1,719 patients with primary hyperlipidemia, ezetimibe significantly lowered total-C (-13%), LDL-C (-19%), Apo B (-14%), and TG (-8%), and increased HDL-C (+3%) compared to placebo. Reduction in LDL-C was consistent across age, sex, and baseline LDL-C.
Simvastatin
In two large, placebo-controlled clinical trials, the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (N=4,444 patients) and the Heart Protection Study (N=20,536 patients), the effects of treatment with simvastatin were assessed in patients at high risk of coronary events because of existing coronary heart disease, diabetes, peripheral vessel disease, history of stroke or other cerebrovascular disease. Simvastatin was proven to reduce: the risk of total mortality by reducing CHD deaths; the risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke; and the need for coronary and non-coronary revascularization procedures.
No incremental benefit of ezetimibe and simvastatin on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality over and above that demonstrated for simvastatin has been established.