Table 1 Oseltamivir Phosphate Dosage Recommendations in Pediatric Patients for Treatment and Prophylaxis of Influenza
* The recommended duration for post-exposure prophylaxis is 10 days and the recommended duration for community outbreak (seasonal/pre-exposure) prophylaxis is up to 6 weeks (or up to 12 weeks in immunocompromised patients). The amount supplied (e.g., number of bottles or capsules) for seasonal prophylaxis may be greater than for post-exposure prophylaxis. ‡ Oseltamivir phosphate for oral suspension is the preferred formulation for patients who cannot swallow capsules. § For patients less than 1 year of age, provide an appropriate dosing device that can accurately measure and administer small volumes. |
Weight
| Treatment Dosing for 5 days
| Prophylaxis Dosing for 10 days*
| Volume of Oral Suspension (6 mg/mL) for each Dose
| Number of Bottles of Oral Suspension to Dispense
| Number of Capsules to Dispense (Strength)‡
|
Patients from 2 Weeks to less than 1 Year of Age |
Any weight
| 3 mg/kg twice daily
| Not applicable
| 0.5 mL/kg§
| 1 bottle
| Not applicable
|
Patients 1 to 12 Years of Age Based on Body Weight
|
15 kg or less
| 30 mg twice daily
| 30 mg once daily
| 5 mL
| 1 bottle
| 10 capsules (30 mg)
|
15.1 kg to 23 kg
| 45 mg twice daily
| 45 mg once daily
| 7.5 mL
| 2 bottles
| 10 capsules (45 mg)
|
23.1 kg to 40 kg
| 60 mg twice daily
| 60 mg once daily
| 10 mL
| 2 bottles
| 20 capsules (30 mg)
|
40.1 kg or more
| 75 mg twice daily
| 75 mg once daily
| 12.5 mL
| 3 bottles
| 10 capsules (75 mg)
|
Table 2 Recommended Dosage Modifications for Treatment and Prophylaxis of Influenza in Adults with Renal Impairment or End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) on Dialysis
* Capsules or oral suspension can be used for 30 mg dosing. † The recommended duration for post-exposure prophylaxis is at least 10 days and the recommended duration for community outbreak (seasonal/pre-exposure) prophylaxis is up to 6 weeks (or up to 12 weeks in immunocompromised patients). ‡ Data derived from studies in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. |
Renal Impairment (Creatinine Clearance)
| Recommended Treatment Regimen*
| Recommended Prophylaxis Regimen*†
|
Mild (>60-90 mL/minute)
| 75 mg twice daily for 5 days
| 75 mg once daily
|
Moderate (>30-60 mL/minute)
| 30 mg twice daily for 5 days
| 30 mg once daily
|
Severe (>10-30 mL/minute)
| 30 mg once daily for 5 days
| 30 mg every other day
|
ESRD Patients on Hemodialysis (≤ 10 mL/minute)
| 30 mg immediately and then 30 mg after every hemodialysis cycle (treatment duration not to exceed 5 days)
| 30 mg immediately and then 30 mg after alternate hemodialysis cycles
|
ESRD Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis‡ (≤10 mL/minute)
| A single 30 mg dose administered immediately
| 30 mg immediately and then 30 mg once weekly
|
ESRD Patients not on Dialysis
| oseltamivir phosphate capsules is not recommended
| oseltamivir phosphate capsules is not recommended
|
| * Adverse reactions that occurred in ≥1% of oseltamivir phosphate-treated adults and adolescents and ≥1% greater in oseltamivir phosphate-treated subjects compared to placebo-treated subjects in either the treatment or prophylaxis trials. |
System Organ Class Adverse Reaction
| Treatment Trials
| Prophylaxis Trials
|
Oseltamivir phosphate 75 mg twice daily (n = 2646)
| Placebo (n = 1977)
| Oseltamivir phosphate 75 mg once daily (n = 1943)
| Placebo (n = 1586)
|
Gastrointestinal Disorders
|
|
|
|
|
Nausea
| 10%
| 6%
| 8%
| 4%
|
Vomiting
| 8%
| 3%
| 2%
| 1%
|
Nervous System Disorders
|
|
|
|
|
Headache
| 2%
| 1%
| 17%
| 16%
|
General Disorders
|
|
|
|
|
Pain
| <1%
| <1%
| 4%
| 3%
|
Adverse Reactions from Treatment and Prophylaxis Trials in Pediatric Subjects (1 year to 12 years of age)
A total of 1,481 pediatric subjects (including otherwise healthy pediatric subjects aged 1 year to 12 years and asthmatic pediatric subjects aged 6 to 12 years) participated in clinical trials of oseltamivir phosphate for the treatment of influenza. A total of 859 pediatric subjects received treatment with oseltamivir phosphate for oral suspension either at a 2 mg per kg twice daily for 5 days or weight-band dosing. Vomiting was the only adverse reaction reported at a frequency of ≥1% in subjects receiving oseltamivir phosphate (16%) compared to placebo (8%).
Amongst the 148 pediatric subjects aged 1 year to 12 years who received oseltamivir phosphate at doses of 30 to 60 mg once daily for 10 days in a post-exposure prophylaxis study in household contacts (n = 99), and in a separate 6-week seasonal influenza prophylaxis safety study (n = 49), vomiting was the most frequent adverse reaction (8% on oseltamivir phosphate versus 2% in the no prophylaxis group).
Adverse Reactions from Treatment Trials in Pediatric Subjects (2 weeks to less than 1 year of age)
Assessment of adverse reactions in pediatric subjects 2 weeks to less than 1 year of age was based on two open-label studies that included safety data on 135 influenza-infected subjects 2 weeks to less than 1 year of age (including premature infants at least 36 weeks post conceptional age) exposed to oseltamivir phosphate at doses ranging from 2 to 3.5 mg per kg of the formulation for oral suspension twice daily orally for 5 days. The safety profile of oseltamivir phosphate was similar across the age range studied, with vomiting (9%), diarrhea (7%) and diaper rash (7%) being the most frequently reported adverse reactions, and was generally comparable to that observed in older pediatric and adult subjects.
Adverse Reactions from the Prophylaxis Trial in Immunocompromised Subjects
In a 12-week seasonal prophylaxis study in 475 immunocompromised subjects, including 18 pediatric subjects 1 year to 12 years of age, the safety profile in the 238 subjects receiving oseltamivir phosphate 75 mg once daily was consistent with that previously observed in other oseltamivir phosphate prophylaxis clinical trials [see Clinical Studies (14.2)].
Renal Function/ Impairment
| Normal Creatinine Clearance 90-140 mL/min (n=57)
| Mild Creatinine Clearance 60-90 mL/min (n=45)
| Moderate Creatinine Clearance 30-60 mL/min (n=13)
| Severe Creatinine Clearance 10-30 mL/min (n=11)
| ESRD Creatinine Clearance <10 mL/min on Hemodialysis (n=24)
|
Recommended Treatment Regimens
|
PK exposure parameter
| 75 mg twice daily
| 75 mg twice daily
| 30 mg twice daily
| 30 mg once daily
| 30 mg every HD cycle
|
Cmin (ng/mL)
| 145
| 253
| 180
| 219
| 221
|
Cmax (ng/mL)
| 298
| 464
| 306
| 477
| 1170
|
AUC48 (ng·h/mL)*
| 11224
| 18476
| 12008
| 16818
| 23200
|
Recommended Prophylaxis Regimens
|
PK exposure parameter
| 75 mg once daily
| 75 mg once daily
| 30 mg once daily
| 30 mg every other day
| 30 mg alternate HD cycle
|
Cmin (ng/mL)
| 39
| 62
| 57
| 70
| 42
|
Cmax (ng/mL)
| 213
| 311
| 209
| 377
| 903
|
AUC48 (ng·hr/mL)*
| 5294
| 8336
| 6262
| 9317
| 11200
|
*AUC normalized to 48 hours.
|
In continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients, the peak concentration of oseltamivir carboxylate following a single 30 mg dose of oseltamivir or once weekly oseltamivir was approximately 3-fold higher than in patients with normal renal function who received 75 mg twice daily. The plasma concentration of oseltamivir carboxylate on Day 5 (147 ng/mL) following a single 30 mg dose in CAPD patients is similar to the predicted Cmin (160 ng/mL) in patients with normal renal function following 75 mg twice daily. Administration of 30 mg once weekly to CAPD patients resulted in plasma concentrations of oseltamivir carboxylate at the 168 hour blood sample of 63 ng/mL, which were comparable to the Cmin in patients with normal renal function receiving the approved regimen of 75 mg once daily (40 ng/mL).
Hepatic Impairment
In clinical studies oseltamivir carboxylate exposure was not altered in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment [see Use in Specific Populations (8.7)].
Pregnant Women
A pooled population pharmacokinetic analysis indicates that the oseltamivir phosphate capsules dosage regimen resulted in lower exposure to the active metabolite in pregnant women (n=59) compared to non-pregnant women (n=33). However, this predicted exposure is expected to have activity against susceptible influenza virus strains and there are insufficient pharmacokinetics and safety data to recommend a dose adjustment for pregnant women [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)].
Pediatric Subjects (1 year to 12 years of age)
The pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate have been evaluated in a single-dose pharmacokinetic study in pediatric subjects aged 5 to 16 years (n=18) and in a small number of pediatric subjects aged 3 to 12 years (n=5) enrolled in a clinical trial. Younger pediatric subjects cleared both the prodrug and the active metabolite faster than adult subjects resulting in a lower exposure for a given mg/kg dose. For oseltamivir carboxylate, apparent total clearance decreases linearly with increasing age (up to 12 years). The pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir in pediatric subjects over 12 years of age are similar to those in adult subjects [see Use in Specific Populations (8.4)].
Pediatric Subjects (2 weeks to less than 1 year of age)
The pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate have been evaluated in two open-label studies of pediatric subjects less than one year of age (n=122) infected with influenza. Apparent clearance of the active metabolite decreases with decreasing age in subjects less than 1 year of age; however the oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate exposure following a 3 mg/kg dose in subjects under 1 year of age is expected to be within the observed exposures in adults and adolescents receiving 75 mg twice daily and 150 mg twice daily [see Use in Specific Populations (8.4)].
Geriatric Patients
Exposure to oseltamivir carboxylate at steady-state was 25 to 35% higher in geriatric subjects (age range 65 to 78 years) compared to young adults given comparable doses of oseltamivir. Half-lives observed in the geriatric subjects were similar to those seen in young adults. Based on drug exposure and tolerability, dose adjustments are not required for geriatric patients for either treatment or prophylaxis [see Use in Specific Populations (8.5)].
Drug Interaction Studies
Oseltamivir is extensively converted to oseltamivir carboxylate by esterases, located predominantly in the liver. Drug interactions involving competition for esterases have not been extensively reported in literature. Low protein binding of oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate suggests that the probability of drug displacement interactions is low.
In vitro studies demonstrate that neither oseltamivir nor oseltamivir carboxylate is a good substrate for P450 mixed-function oxidases or for glucuronyl transferases.
Coadministration of probenecid results in an approximate two-fold increase in exposure to oseltamivir carboxylate due to a decrease in active anionic tubular secretion in the kidney. However, due to the safety margin of oseltamivir carboxylate, no dose adjustments are required when coadministering with probenecid. No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions have been observed when coadministering oseltamivir with amoxicillin, acetaminophen, aspirin, cimetidine, antacids (magnesium and aluminum hydroxides and calcium carbonates), rimantadine, amantadine, or warfarin.
Table 8 Neuraminidase Amino Acid Substitutions Associated with Reduced Susceptibility to Oseltamivir
* All numbering is N2, except where indicated
|
Amino Acid Substitution*
|
Influenza A N1 (N1 numbering in brackets)
|
I117V (I117V), E119V (E119V), R152K (R152K), Y155H (Y155H), F173V (F174V), D198G/N (D199G/N), I222K/R/T/V (I223K/R/T/V), S246N (S247N), G248R+I266V (G249R+I267V), H274Y (H275Y), N294S (N295S), Q312R+I427T (Q313R+I427T), N325K (N325K), R371K (R368K)
|
Influenza A N2
|
E41G, E119I/V, D151V, I222L/V, Q226H, SASG245-248 deletion, S247P, R292K, N294S
|
Influenza B (B numbering in brackets)
|
E119A (E117A), P141S (P139S), G142R (G140R), R152K (R150K), D198E/N/Y (D197E/N/Y), I222L/T/V (I221L/T/V), A246D/S/T (A245D/S/T), H274Y (H273Y), N294S (N294S), R371K (R374K), G402S (G407S)
|
Selection of influenza A viruses resistant to oseltamivir can occur at higher frequencies in children. The incidence of oseltamivir treatment-associated resistance in pediatric treatment studies has been detected at rates of 27 to 37% and 3 to 18% (3/11 to 7/19 and 1/34 to 9/50 post-treatment isolates, respectively) for influenza A/H1N1 virus and influenza A/H3N2 virus, respectively. The frequency of resistance selection to oseltamivir and the prevalence of such resistant virus vary seasonally and geographically.
Circulating seasonal influenza strains expressing neuraminidase resistance-associated substitutions have been observed in individuals who have not received oseltamivir treatment. The oseltamivir resistance-associated substitution H275Y was found in more than 99% of US-circulating 2008 H1N1 influenza virus isolates. The 2009 H1N1 influenza virus (“swine flu”) was almost uniformly susceptible to oseltamivir; however, the frequency of circulating resistant variants can change from season to season. Prescribers should consider available information from the CDC on influenza virus drug susceptibility patterns and treatment effects when deciding whether to use oseltamivir phosphate capsules.
Cross-resistance
Cross-resistance between oseltamivir and zanamivir has been observed in neuraminidase biochemical assays. The H275Y (N1 numbering) or N294S (N2 numbering) oseltamivir resistance-associated substitutions observed in the N1 neuraminidase subtype, and the E119V or N294S oseltamivir resistance-associated substitutions observed in the N2 subtype (N2 numbering), are associated with reduced susceptibility to oseltamivir but not zanamivir. The Q136K and K150T zanamivir resistance-associated substitutions observed in N1 neuraminidase, or the S250G zanamivir resistance-associated substitutions observed in influenza B virus neuraminidase, confer reduced susceptibility to zanamivir but not oseltamivir. The R292K oseltamivir resistance-associated substitution observed in N2, and the I222T, D198E/N, R371K, or G402S oseltamivir resistance-associated substitutions observed in influenza B virus neuraminidase, confer reduced susceptibility to both oseltamivir and zanamivir. These examples do not represent an exhaustive list of cross-resistance-associated substitutions and prescribers should consider available information from the CDC on influenza drug susceptibility patterns and treatment effects when deciding whether to use oseltamivir phosphate capsules.
No single amino acid substitution has been identified that could confer cross-resistance between the neuraminidase inhibitor class (oseltamivir, zanamivir) and the M2 ion channel inhibitor class (amantadine, rimantadine). However, a virus may carry a neuraminidase inhibitor-associated substitution in neuraminidase and an M2 ion channel inhibitor associated substitution in M2 and may therefore be resistant to both classes of inhibitors. The clinical relevance of phenotypic cross-resistance evaluations has not been established.
Immune Response
No influenza vaccine/oseltamivir interaction study has been conducted. In studies of naturally acquired and experimental influenza, treatment with oseltamivir phosphate capsules did not impair normal humoral antibody response to infection.