Immune System Disorders: allergic reaction, including angioedema.
Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders: lactic acidosis, hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia.
Respiratory, Thoracic, and Mediastinal Disorders: dyspnea.
Gastrointestinal Disorders: pancreatitis, increased amylase, abdominal pain.
Renal and Urinary Disorders: renal insufficiency, acute renal failure, renal failure, acute tubular necrosis, Fanconi syndrome, proximal renal tubulopathy, interstitial nephritis (including acute cases), nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, renal insufficiency, increased creatinine, proteinuria, polyuria [see Warnings and Precautions (5.3)].
Hepatobiliary Disorders: hepatic steatosis, hepatitis, increased liver enzymes (most commonly AST, ALT gamma GT).
Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders: rash.
Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders: rhabdomyolysis, osteomalacia (manifested as bone pain and which may contribute to fractures), muscular weakness, myopathy.
General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions: asthenia.
The following adverse reactions, listed under the body system headings above, may occur as a consequence of proximal renal tubulopathy: rhabdomyolysis, osteomalacia, hypokalemia, muscular weakness, myopathy, hypophosphatemia.
Reproduction studies have been performed in rats and rabbits at doses up to 14 and 19 times the human dose based on body surface area comparisons and revealed no evidence of impaired fertility or harm to the fetus due to tenofovir.
Samples of breast milk obtained from five HIV-1-infected mothers in the first postpartum week show that tenofovir is excreted in human milk at low levels. The impact of this exposure in breastfed infants is unknown and the effects of TDF on milk production is unknown.
Because of the potential for 1) HIV transmission (in HIV-negative infants); 2) developing viral resistance (in HIV-positive infants); and 3) adverse reactions in a breastfed infant similar to those seen in adults, instruct mothers not to breastfeed if they are receiving CIMDUO.
Following oral administration of a single 300-mg dose of TDF to HIV-1-infected subjects in the fasted state, maximum serum concentrations (Cmax) were achieved in 1.0 ± 0.4 hrs (mean ± SD) and Cmax and AUC values were 296 ± 90 ng/mL and 2287 ± 685 ng•hr/mL, respectively. The oral bioavailability of tenofovir from TDF in fasted subjects is approximately 25%. Less than 0.7% of tenofovir binds to human plasma proteins in vitro and the binding is independent of concentration over the range of 0.01 to 25 mcg/mL. Approximately 70 to 80% of the intravenous dose of tenofovir is recovered as unchanged drug in the urine. Tenofovir is eliminated by a combination of glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion with a renal clearance in adults with normal renal function of 243 ± 33 mL/min (mean ± SD). Following a single oral dose, the terminal elimination half-life of tenofovir is approximately 17 hours.
There were insufficient numbers from racial and ethnic groups other than Caucasian to adequately determine potential pharmacokinetic differences among these populations.
The pharmacokinetics of tenofovir are altered in subjects with renal impairment [see Warnings and Precautions (5.3)]. In subjects with creatinine clearance below 50 mL/min or with end‑stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis, Cmax, and AUC0‑∞ of tenofovir were increased.
Table 4. Pharmacokinetic Parameters (Mean ± SD) of Tenofovir in Subjects after a Single 300-mg Oral Dose of TDF in Subjects with Varying Degrees of Renal FunctionBaseline Creatinine Clearance (mL/min) | > 80 (N = 3) | 50-80 (N = 10) | 30-49 (N = 8) | 12-29 (N = 11) |
Cmax (µg/mL) | 0.34 ± 0.03 | 0.33 ± 0.06 | 0.37 ± 0.16 | 0.60 ± 0.19 |
AUC0-∞ (µg•hr/mL) | 2.18 ± 0.26 | 3.06 ± 0.93 | 6.01 ± 2.50 | 15.98 ± 7.22 |
CL/F (mL/min) | 1043.7 ± 115.4 | 807.7 ± 279.2 | 444.4 ± 209.8 | 177.0 ± 97.1 |
CLrenal (mL/min) | 243.5 ± 33.3 | 168.6 ± 27.5 | 100.6 ± 27.5 | 43.0 ± 31.2 |
The pharmacokinetics of tenofovir following a 300 mg single dose of TDF have been studied in non-HIV-infected subjects with moderate to severe (Child-Pugh B to C) hepatic impairment. There were no substantial alterations in tenofovir pharmacokinetics in subjects with hepatic impairment compared with unimpaired subjects.
At concentrations substantially higher (~300-fold) than those observed in vivo, tenofovir did not inhibit in vitro CYP3A4, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, or CYP2E1. However, a small (6%) but statistically significant reduction in metabolism of CYP1A substrate was observed. Based on the results of in vitro experiments and the known elimination pathway of tenofovir, the potential for CYP mediated interactions involving TDF with other medicinal products is low.
TDF has been evaluated in healthy volunteers in combination with other antiretroviral and potential concomitant drugs. Tables 5 and 6 summarize pharmacokinetic effects of coadministered drug on tenofovir pharmacokinetics and effects of TDF on the pharmacokinetics of coadministered drug. Coadministration of TDF with didanosine results in changes in the pharmacokinetics of didanosine that may be of clinical significance. Concomitant dosing of TDF with didanosine significantly increases the Cmax and AUC of didanosine. When didanosine 250 mg enteric-coated capsules were administered with TDF, systemic exposures of didanosine were similar to those seen with the 400 mg enteric-coated capsules alone under fasted conditions (Table 5). The mechanism of this interaction is unknown.
No clinically significant drug interactions have been observed between TDF and efavirenz, methadone, nelfinavir, oral contraceptives, ribavirin, or sofosbuvir.
Table 5. Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters for TenofovirSubjects received TDF 300 mg once daily.
in the Presence of the Coadministered DrugCoadministered Drug | Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) | % Change of Tenofovir Pharmacokinetic Parameters Increase = ↑; Decrease = ↓; No Effect = ↔ (90% CI) |
Cmax | AUC | Cmin |
Atazanavir Reyataz® (atazanavir) Prescribing Information. | 400 once daily × 14 days | ↑ 14 (↑ 8 to ↑ 20) | ↑ 24 (↑ 21 to ↑ 28) | ↑ 22 (↑ 15 to ↑ 30) |
Atazanavir/ Ritonavir Prezista® (darunavir) Prescribing Information. | 300/100 once daily | ↑ 34 (↑ 20 to ↑ 51) | ↑ 37 (↑ 30 to ↑ 45) | ↑ 29 (↑ 21 to ↑ 36) |
Darunavir/ Ritonavir | 300/100 twice daily | ↑ 24 (↑ 8 to ↑ 42) | ↑ 22 (↑ 10 to ↑ 35) | ↑ 37 (↑ 19 to ↑ 57) |
Indinavir | 800 three times daily × 7 days | ↑ 14 (↓ 3 to ↑ 33) | ↔ | ↔ |
Ledipasvir/ Sofosbuvir Data generated from simultaneous dosing with HARVONI (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir). Staggered administration (12 hours apart) provide similar results. Comparison based on exposures when administered as atazanavir/ritonavir + emtricitabine/TDF. | 90/400 once daily × 10 days | ↑ 47 (↑ 37 to ↑ 58) | ↑ 35 (↑ 29 to ↑ 42) | ↑ 47 (↑ 38 to ↑ 57) |
Ledipasvir/ Sofosbuvir Comparison based on exposures when administered as darunavir/ritonavir + emtricitabine/TDF. | ↑ 64 (↑ 54 to ↑ 74) | ↑ 50 (↑ 42 to ↑ 59) | ↑ 59 (↑ 49 to ↑ 70) |
Ledipasvir/ Sofosbuvir Study conducted with ATRIPLA® (efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF) coadministered with HARVONI. | 90/400 once daily × 14 days | ↑ 79 (↑ 56 to ↑ 104) | ↑ 98 (↑ 77 to ↑ 123) | ↑ 163 (↑ 132 to ↑ 197) |
Ledipasvir/ Sofosbuvir Study conducted with COMPLERA® (emtricitabine/rilpivirine/tenofovir DF) coadministered with HARVONI. | 90/400 once daily × 10 days | ↑ 32 (↑ 25 to ↑ 39) | ↑ 40 (↑ 31 to ↑ 50) | ↑ 91 (↑ 74 to ↑ 110) |
Ledipasvir/ Sofosbuvir Study conducted with TRUVADA® (emtricitabine/tenofovir DF) + dolutegravir coadministered with HARVONI. | 90/400 once daily × 10 days | ↑ 61 (↑ 51 to ↑ 72) | ↑ 65 (↑ 59 to ↑ 71) | ↑ 115 (↑ 105 to ↑ 126) |
Lopinavir/ Ritonavir | 400/100 twice daily × 14 days | ↔ | ↑ 32 (↑ 25 to ↑ 38) | ↑ 51 (↑ 37 to ↑ 66) |
Saquinavir/ Ritonavir | 1000/100 twice daily × 14 days | ↔ | ↔ | ↑ 23 (↑ 16 to ↑ 30) |
Sofosbuvir Study conducted with ATRIPLA coadministered with SOVALDI® (sofosbuvir). | 400 single dose | ↑ 25 ↑ 8 to ↑ 45) | ↔ | ↔ |
Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvir Comparison based on exposures when administered as atazanavir/ritonavir + emtricitabine/tenofovir DF. | 400/100 once daily | ↑ 55 (↑ 43 to ↑ 68) | ↑ 30 (↑ 24 to ↑ 36) | ↑ 39 (↑ 31 to ↑ 48) |
Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvir Comparison based on exposures when administered as darunavir/ritonavir + emtricitabine/tenofovir DF. | 400/100 once daily | ↑ 55 (↑ 45 to ↑ 66) | ↑ 39 (↑ 33 to ↑ 44) | ↑ 52 (↑ 45 to ↑ 59) |
Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvir Study conducted with ATRIPLA coadministered with EPCLUSA (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir). | 400/100 once daily | ↑ 77 (↑ 53 to ↑ 104) | ↑ 81 (↑ 68 to ↑ 94) | ↑ 121 (↑ 100 to ↑ 143) |
Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvir Study conducted with STRIBILD® (elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF) coadministered with EPCLUSA. | 400/100 once daily | ↑ 36 (↑ 25 to ↑ 47) | ↑ 35 (↑ 29 to ↑ 42) | ↑ 45 (↑ 39 to ↑ 51) |
Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvir Study conducted with COMPLERA coadministered with EPCLUSA. | 400/100 once daily | ↑ 44 (↑ 33 to ↑ 55) | ↑ 40 (↑ 34 to ↑ 46) | ↑ 84 (↑ 76 to ↑ 92) |
Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvir Administered as raltegravir + emtricitabine/tenofovir DF. | 400/100 once daily | ↑ 46 (↑ 39 to ↑ 54) | ↑ 40 (↑ 34 to ↑ 45) | ↑ 70 (↑ 61 to ↑ 79) |
Tacrolimus | 0.05 mg/kg twice daily × 7 days | ↑ 13 (↑ 1 to ↑ 27) | ↔ | ↔ |
Tipranavir/ Ritonavir Aptivus® (tipranavir) Prescribing Information. | 500/100 twice daily | ↓ 23 (↓ 32 to ↓ 13) | ↓ 2 (↓ 9 to ↑ 5) | ↑ 7 (↓ 2 to ↑ 17) |
750/200 twice daily (23 doses) | ↓ 38 (↓ 46 to ↓ 29) | ↑ 2 (↓ 6 to ↑ 10) | ↑ 14 (↑ 1 to ↑ 27) |
No effect on the pharmacokinetic parameters of the following coadministered drugs was observed with TDF: abacavir, didanosine (buffered tablets), emtricitabine, entecavir, and lamivudine.
Table 6. Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Coadministered Drug in the Presence of TDFCoadministered Drug | Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) | % Change of Coadministered Drug Pharmacokinetic Parameters Increase = ↑; Decrease = ↓; No Effect = ↔; NA = Not Applicable (90% CI) |
Cmax | AUC | Cmin |
Abacavir | 300 once | ↑ 12 (↓ 1 to ↑ 26) | ↔ | NA |
Atazanavir Reyataz (atazanavir) Prescribing Information. | 400 once daily × 14 days | ↓ 21 (↓ 27 to ↓ 14) | ↓ 25 (↓ 30 to ↓ 19) | ↓ 40 (↓ 48 to ↓ 32) |
Atazanavir | Atazanavir/ Ritonavir 300/100 once daily × 42 days | ↓ 28 (↓ 50 to ↑ 5) | ↓ 25 In HIV-infected subjects, addition of TDF to atazanavir 300 mg plus ritonavir 100 mg, resulted in AUC and Cmin values of atazanavir that were 2.3- and 4-fold higher than the respective values observed for atazanavir 400 mg when given alone. (↓ 42 to ↓ 3) | ↓ 23 (↓ 46 to ↑ 10) |
Darunavir Prezista (darunavir) Prescribing Information. | Darunavir/Ritonavir 300/100 once daily | ↑ 16 (↓ 6 to ↑ 42) | ↑ 21 (↓ 5 to ↑ 54) | ↑ 24 (↓ 10 to ↑ 69) |
Didanosine Videx EC® Prescribing Information. Subjects received didanosine enteric-coated capsules. | 250 once, simultaneously with VIREAD® and a light meal 373 kcal, 8.2 g fat | ↓ 20 Compared with didanosine (enteric-coated) 400 mg administered alone under fasting conditions. (↓ 32 to ↓ 7) | ↔ | NA |
Emtricitabine | 200 once daily × 7 days | ↔ | ↔ | ↑ 20 (↑ 12 to ↑ 29) |
Entecavir | 1 mg once daily × 10 days | ↔ | ↑ 13 (↑ 11 to ↑ 15) | ↔ |
Indinavir | 800 three times daily × 7 days | ↓ 11 (↓ 30 to ↑ 12) | ↔ | ↔ |
Lamivudine | 150 twice daily × 7 days | ↓ 24 (↓ 34 to ↓ 12) | ↔ | ↔ |
Lopinavir Ritonavir | Lopinavir/Ritonavir 400/100 twice daily × 14 days | ↔ ↔ | ↔ ↔ | ↔ ↔ |
Saquinavir | Saquinavir/Ritonavir 1000/100 twice daily × 14 days | ↑ 22 (↑ 6 to ↑ 41) | ↑ 29 Increases in AUC and Cmin are not expected to be clinically relevant; hence no dose adjustments are required when tenofovir DF and ritonavir-boosted saquinavir are coadministered. (↑ 12 to ↑ 48) | ↑ 47 (↑ 23 to ↑ 76) |
Ritonavir | ↔ | ↔ | ↑ 23 (↑ 3 to ↑ 46) |
Tacrolimus | 0.05 mg/kg twice daily × 7 days | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ |
Tipranavir Aptivus (tipranavir) Prescribing Information. | Tipranavir/Ritonavir 500/100 twice daily | ↓ 17 (↓ 26 to ↓ 6) | ↓ 18 (↓ 25 to ↓ 9) | ↓ 21 (↓ 30 to ↓ 10) |
Tipranavir/Ritonavir 750/200 twice daily (23 doses) | ↓ 11 (↓ 16 to ↓ 4) | ↓ 9 (↓ 15 to ↓ 3) | ↓ 12 (↓ 22 to 0) |
TDF is an acyclic nucleoside phosphonate diester analog of adenosine monophosphate. TDF requires initial diester hydrolysis for conversion to tenofovir and subsequent phosphorylations by cellular enzymes to form tenofovir diphosphate. Tenofovir diphosphate inhibits the activity of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase and HBV reverse transcriptase by competing with the natural substrate deoxyadenosine 5’-triphosphate and, after incorporation into DNA, by DNA chain termination. Tenofovir diphosphate is a weak inhibitor of mammalian DNA polymerases α, β, and mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ.
The antiviral activity of tenofovir against laboratory and clinical isolates of HIV-1 was assessed in lymphoblastoid cell lines, primary monocyte/macrophage cells and peripheral blood lymphocytes. The EC50 (50% effective concentration) values for tenofovir were in the range of 0.04 μM to 8.5 μM. Tenofovir displayed antiviral activity in cell culture against HIV-1 clades A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and O (EC50 values ranged from 0.5 μM to 2.2 μM) and strain-specific activity against HIV-2 (EC50 values ranged from 1.6 μM to 5.5 μM). Please see the full prescribing information for VIREAD for information regarding the inhibitory activity of TDF against HBV.
HIV-1 isolates with reduced susceptibility to tenofovir have been selected in cell culture. These viruses expressed a K65R substitution in reverse transcriptase and showed a 2- to 4-fold reduction in susceptibility to tenofovir. In addition, a K70E substitution in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase has been selected by tenofovir and results in low-level reduced susceptibility to tenofovir. K65R substitutions developed in some subjects failing a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate regimen.
Cross-resistance among NRTIs has been observed. The K65R and K70E substitutions selected by tenofovir are also selected in some HIV-1-infected subjects treated with abacavir or didanosine. HIV-1 isolates with the K65R substitution also showed reduced susceptibility to FTC and 3TC. HIV-1 isolates from subjects (N = 20) whose HIV-1 expressed a mean of 3 zidovudine-associated RT amino acid substitutions (M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215Y/F, or K219Q/E/N) showed a 3.1-fold decrease in the susceptibility to tenofovir. Subjects whose virus expressed an L74V substitution without zidovudine resistance-associated substitutions (N = 8) had reduced response to VIREAD. Limited data are available for patients whose virus expressed a Y115F substitution (N = 3), Q151M substitution (N = 2), or T69 insertion (N = 4), all of whom had a reduced response.
Long-term oral carcinogenicity studies of TDF in mice and rats were carried out at exposures up to approximately 16 times (mice) and 5 times (rats) those observed in humans at the therapeutic dose for HIV-1 infection. At the high dose in female mice, liver adenomas were increased at exposures 16 times that in humans. In rats, the study was negative for carcinogenic findings at exposures up to 5 times that observed in humans at the therapeutic dose.
TDF was mutagenic in the in vitro mouse lymphoma assay and negative in an in vitro bacterial mutagenicity test (Ames test). In an in vivo mouse micronucleus assay, TDF was negative when administered to male mice.
There were no effects on fertility, mating performance or early embryonic development when TDF was administered to male rats at a dose equivalent to 10 times the human dose based on body surface area comparisons for 28 days prior to mating and to female rats for 15 days prior to mating through day seven of gestation. There was, however, an alteration of the estrous cycle in female rats.
Tenofovir and TDF administered in toxicology studies to rats, dogs, and monkeys at exposures (based on AUCs) greater than or equal to 6-fold those observed in humans caused bone toxicity. In monkeys the bone toxicity was diagnosed as osteomalacia. Osteomalacia observed in monkeys appeared to be reversible upon dose reduction or discontinuation of tenofovir. In rats and dogs, the bone toxicity manifested as reduced bone mineral density. The mechanism(s) underlying bone toxicity is unknown.
Evidence of renal toxicity was noted in 4 animal species. Increases in serum creatinine, BUN, glycosuria, proteinuria, phosphaturia, and/or calciuria and decreases in serum phosphate were observed to varying degrees in these animals. These toxicities were noted at exposures (based on AUCs) 2 to 20 times higher than those observed in humans. The relationship of the renal abnormalities, particularly the phosphaturia, to the bone toxicity is not known.