Ezetimibe reduces total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, non-HDL-C, and TG, and increases HDL-C in patients with hyperlipidemia. Maximal to near maximal response is generally achieved within 2 weeks and maintained during chronic therapy.
Monotherapy
In two multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week studies in 1719 patients with primary hyperlipidemia, ezetimibe significantly lowered total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, non-HDL-C, and TG, and increased HDL-C compared to placebo (see
Table 6). Reduction in LDL-C was consistent across age, sex, and baseline LDL-C.
TABLE 6: Response to Ezetimibe in Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia (Mean
For triglycerides, median % change from baseline
% Change from Untreated Baseline
Baseline - on no lipid-lowering drug
)
| Treatment Group | N | Total-C | LDL-C | Apo B | Non-HDL-C | TG
| HDL-C |
|---|
| Study 1
Ezetimibe significantly reduced total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, non-HDL-C, and TG, and increased HDL-C compared to placebo. | Placebo | 205 | +1 | +1 | -1 | +1 | -1 | -1 |
| Ezetimibe | 622 | -12 | -18 | -15 | -16 | -7 | +1 |
| Study 2
| Placebo | 226 | +1 | +1 | -1 | +2 | +2 | -2 |
| Ezetimibe | 666 | -12 | -18 | -16 | -16 | -9 | +1 |
| Pooled Data
(Studies 1 & 2)
| Placebo | 431 | 0 | +1 | -2 | +1 | 0 | -2 |
| Ezetimibe | 1288 | -13 | -18 | -16 | -16 | -8 | +1 |
Combination with Statins
Ezetimibe Added to On-going Statin Therapy
In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week study, 769 patients with primary hyperlipidemia, known coronary heart disease or multiple cardiovascular risk factors who were already receiving statin monotherapy, but who had not met their NCEP ATP II target LDL-C goal were randomized to receive either ezetimibe or placebo in addition to their on-going statin.
Ezetimibe, added to on-going statin therapy, significantly lowered total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, non-HDL-C, and TG, and increased HDL-C compared with a statin administered alone (see
Table 7). LDL-C reductions induced by ezetimibe were generally consistent across all statins.
TABLE 7: Response to Addition of Ezetimibe to On-Going Statin Therapy
Patients receiving each statin: 40% atorvastatin, 31% simvastatin, 29% others (pravastatin, fluvastatin, cerivastatin, lovastatin)
in Patients with Hyperlipidemia (Mean
For triglycerides, median % change from baseline
% Change from Treated Baseline
Baseline - on a statin alone.
)
| Treatment (Daily Dose) | N | Total-C | LDL-C | Apo B | Non-HDL-C | TG
| HDL-C |
|---|
| On-going Statin +
Placebo Ezetimibe + statin significantly reduced total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, non-HDL-C, and TG, and increased HDL-C compared to statin alone | 390 | -2 | -4 | -3 | -3 | -3 | +1 |
| On-going Statin +
Ezetimibe | 379 | -17 | -25 | -19 | -23 | -14 | +3 |
Ezetimibe Initiated Concurrently with a Statin
In four multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week trials, in 2382 hyperlipidemic patients, ezetimibe or placebo was administered alone or with various doses of atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, or lovastatin.
When all patients receiving ezetimibe with a statin were compared to all those receiving the corresponding statin alone, ezetimibe significantly lowered total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, non-HDL-C, and TG, and, with the exception of pravastatin, increased HDL-C compared to the statin administered alone. LDL-C reductions induced by ezetimibe were generally consistent across all statins. (See footnote
,
Tables 8 to
11.)
TABLE 8: Response to Ezetimibe and Atorvastatin Initiated Concurrently in Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia (Mean
For triglycerides, median % change from baseline
% Change from Untreated Baseline
Baseline - on no lipid-lowering drug
)
Treatment
(Daily Dose)
| N | Total-C | LDL-C | Apo B | Non-HDL-C | TG
| HDL-C |
|---|
| Placebo | 60 | +4 | +4 | +3 | +4 | -6 | +4 |
| Ezetimibe | 65 | -14 | -20 | -15 | -18 | -5 | +4 |
| Atorvastatin 10 mg | 60 | -26 | -37 | -28 | -34 | -21 | +6 |
| Ezetimibe + Atorvastatin 10 mg | 65 | -38 | -53 | -43 | -49 | -31 | +9 |
| Atorvastatin 20 mg | 60 | -30 | -42 | -34 | -39 | -23 | +4 |
| Ezetimibe + Atorvastatin 20 mg | 62 | -39 | -54 | -44 | -50 | -30 | +9 |
| Atorvastatin 40 mg | 66 | -32 | -45 | -37 | -41 | -24 | +4 |
| Ezetimibe + Atorvastatin 40 mg | 65 | -42 | -56 | -45 | -52 | -34 | +5 |
| Atorvastatin 80 mg | 62 | -40 | -54 | -46 | -51 | -31 | +3 |
| Ezetimibe + Atorvastatin 80 mg | 63 | -46 | -61 | -50 | -58 | -40 | +7 |
| Pooled data (All Atorvastatin Doses)
Ezetimibe + all doses of atorvastatin pooled (10 mg to 80 mg) significantly reduced total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, non-HDL-C, and TG, and increased HDL-C compared to all doses of atorvastatin pooled (10 mg to 80 mg). | 248 | -32 | -44 | -36 | -41 | -24 | +4 |
| Pooled data (All Ezetimibe + Atorvastatin Doses)
| 255 | -41 | -56 | -45 | -52 | -33 | +7 |
TABLE 9: Response to Ezetimibe and Simvastatin Initiated Concurrently in Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia (Mean
For triglycerides, median % change from baseline
% Change from Untreated Baseline
Baseline - on no lipid-lowering drug
)
Treatment
(Daily Dose)
| N | Total-C | LDL-C | Apo B | Non-HDL-C | TG
| HDL-C |
|---|
| Placebo | 70 | -1 | -1 | 0 | -1 | +2 | +1 |
| Ezetimibe | 61 | -13 | -19 | -14 | -17 | -11 | +5 |
| Simvastatin 10 mg | 70 | -18 | -27 | -21 | -25 | -14 | +8 |
| Ezetimibe + Simvastatin 10 mg | 67 | -32 | -46 | -35 | -42 | -26 | +9 |
| Simvastatin 20 mg | 61 | -26 | -36 | -29 | -33 | -18 | +6 |
| Ezetimibe + Simvastatin 20 mg | 69 | -33 | -46 | -36 | -42 | -25 | +9 |
| Simvastatin 40 mg | 65 | -27 | -38 | -32 | -35 | -24 | +6 |
| Ezetimibe + Simvastatin 40 mg | 73 | -40 | -56 | -45 | -51 | -32 | +11 |
| Simvastatin 80 mg | 67 | -32 | -45 | -37 | -41 | -23 | +8 |
| Ezetimibe + Simvastatin 80 mg | 65 | -41 | -58 | -47 | -53 | -31 | +8 |
| Pooled data (All Simvastatin Doses)
Ezetimibe + all doses of simvastatin pooled (10 mg to 80 mg) significantly reduced total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, non-HDL-C, and TG, and increased HDL-C compared to all doses of simvastatin pooled (10 mg to 80 mg). | 263 | -26 | -36 | -30 | -34 | -20 | +7 |
| Pooled data (All Ezetimibe + Simvastatin Doses)
| 274 | -37 | -51 | -41 | -47 | -29 | +9 |
TABLE 10: Response to Ezetimibe and Pravastatin Initiated Concurrently in Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia (Mean
For triglycerides, median % change from baseline
% Change from Untreated Baseline
Baseline - on no lipid-lowering drug
)
Treatment
(Daily Dose)
| N | Total-C | LDL-C | Apo B | Non-HDL-C | TG
| HDL-C |
|---|
| Placebo | 65 | 0 | -1 | -2 | 0 | -1 | +2 |
| Ezetimibe | 64 | -13 | -20 | -15 | -17 | -5 | +4 |
| Pravastatin 10 mg | 66 | -15 | -21 | -16 | -20 | -14 | +6 |
| Ezetimibe + Pravastatin 10 mg | 71 | -24 | -34 | -27 | -32 | -23 | +8 |
| Pravastatin 20 mg | 69 | -15 | -23 | -18 | -20 | -8 | +8 |
| Ezetimibe + Pravastatin 20 mg | 66 | -27 | -40 | -31 | -36 | -21 | +8 |
| Pravastatin 40 mg | 70 | -22 | -31 | -26 | -28 | -19 | +6 |
| Ezetimibe + Pravastatin 40 mg | 67 | -30 | -42 | -32 | -39 | -21 | +8 |
| Pooled data (All Pravastatin Doses)
Ezetimibe + all doses of pravastatin pooled (10 mg to 40 mg) significantly reduced total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, non-HDL-C, and TG compared to all doses of pravastatin pooled (10 mg to 40 mg). | 205 | -17 | -25 | -20 | -23 | -14 | +7 |
| Pooled data (All Ezetimibe + Pravastatin Doses)
| 204 | -27 | -39 | -30 | -36 | -21 | +8 |
TABLE 11: Response to Ezetimibe and Lovastatin Initiated Concurrently in Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia (Mean
For triglycerides, median % change from baseline
% Change from Untreated Baseline
Baseline - on no lipid-lowering drug
)
Treatment
(Daily Dose)
| N | Total-C | LDL-C | Apo B | Non-HDL-C | TG
| HDL-C |
|---|
| Placebo | 64 | +1 | 0 | +1 | +1 | +6 | 0 |
| Ezetimibe | 72 | -13 | -19 | -14 | -16 | -5 | +3 |
| Lovastatin 10 mg | 73 | -15 | -20 | -17 | -19 | -11 | +5 |
| Ezetimibe + Lovastatin 10 mg | 65 | -24 | -34 | -27 | -31 | -19 | +8 |
| Lovastatin 20 mg | 74 | -19 | -26 | -21 | -24 | -12 | +3 |
| Ezetimibe + Lovastatin 20 mg | 62 | -29 | -41 | -34 | -39 | -27 | +9 |
| Lovastatin 40 mg | 73 | -21 | -30 | -25 | -27 | -15 | +5 |
| Ezetimibe + Lovastatin 40 mg | 65 | -33 | -46 | -38 | -43 | -27 | +9 |
| Pooled data (All Lovastatin Doses)
Ezetimibe + all doses of lovastatin pooled (10 to 40 mg) significantly reduced total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, non-HDL-C, and TG, and increased HDL-C compared to all doses of lovastatin pooled (10 to 40 mg). | 220 | -18 | -25 | -21 | -23 | -12 | +4 |
| Pooled data (All Ezetimibe + Lovastatin Doses)
| 192 | -29 | -40 | -33 | -38 | -25 | +9 |
Combination with Fenofibrate
In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical study in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia, 625 patients were treated for up to 12 weeks and 576 for up to an additional 48 weeks. Patients were randomized to receive placebo, ezetimibe alone, 160 mg fenofibrate alone, or ezetimibe and 160 mg fenofibrate in the 12-week study. After completing the 12-week study, eligible patients were assigned to ezetimibe coadministered with fenofibrate or fenofibrate monotherapy for an additional 48 weeks.
Ezetimibe co-administered with fenofibrate significantly lowered total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and non-HDL-C compared to fenofibrate administered alone. The percent decrease in TG and percent increase in HDL-C for ezetimibe co-administered with fenofibrate were comparable to those for fenofibrate administered alone (see
Table 12).
TABLE 12: Response to Ezetimibe and Fenofibrate Initiated Concurrently in Patients with Mixed Hyperlipidemia (Mean
For triglycerides, median % change from baseline
% Change from Untreated Baseline
Baseline - on no lipid-lowering drug
at 12 weeks)
Treatment
(Daily Dose)
| N | Total-C | LDL-C | Apo B | TG
| HDL-C | Non-HDL-C |
|---|
| Placebo | 63 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -9 | +3 | 0 |
| Ezetimibe | 185 | -12 | -13 | -11 | -11 | +4 | -15 |
| Fenofibrate 160 mg | 188 | -11 | -6 | -15 | -43 | +19 | -16 |
Ezetimibe + Fenofibrate
160 mg
| 183 | -22 | -20 | -26 | -44 | +19 | -30 |
The changes in lipid endpoints after an additional 48 weeks of treatment with ezetimibe co-administered with fenofibrate or with fenofibrate alone were consistent with the 12-week data displayed above.