Product Images Loseasonique

This appears to be a table or graph showing results from various studies comparing the use of combined oral contraceptives (COC) to never using them. The studies mentioned are the NICHD Women's Care Study, French E3N Cohort Study, Shanghai Women's Health Study, The Nurses' Health Study II, Oxford Family Planning Study, and the Danish Sex Hormone Register Study. The effect estimate is shown in the table with a range of values for various measures such as odds ratio (OR), relative risk (RR), and hazard ratio (HR). Without additional context or information, it is not clear what the specific findings or implications of these studies are.*

This text is describing different methods of birth control and their efficacy rates. It provides a range of numbers for the average number of pregnancies per 100 women in one year for individuals who use various birth control methods, including implants, injections, intrauterine devices, sterilization, birth control pills, skin patches, vaginal rings with hormones, condoms, diaphragms, spermicide, withdrawal, and no birth control. The text suggests that using certain forms of birth control such as implants, injections, and sterilization, resulted in fewer pregnancies per year than other forms of birth control such as birth control pills, vaginal rings, or condoms. It also highlights the option of choosing to abstain from sex entirely during the most fertile days of the monthly cycle as a means of birth control.*