TABLE 3. Effect of Atorvastatin on the Pharmacokinetics of Co-administered DrugsAtorvastatin
| Co-administered
| drug and dosing regimen
|
|
| Drug/Dose (mg)
| Change in AUC
| Change in Cmax
|
80 mg QD for 15 days
| Antipyrine, 600 mg SD
| ↑ 3% | ↓ 11% |
80 mg QD for 14 days
| * Digoxin 0.25 mg
QD, 20 days | ↑ 15% | ↑ 20% |
40 mg QD for 22 days
| Oral contraceptive QD, 2 months
|
|
|
| - norethindrone 1 mg
| ↑ 28% | ↑ 23% |
| - ethinyl estradiol 35µg | ↑ 19% | ↑ 30% |
* See
PRECAUTIONS, Drug Interactions
for clinical significance.
PharmacodynamicsHemodynamic Effects of Amlodipine
Following administration of therapeutic doses to patients with
hypertension, amlodipine produces vasodilation resulting in a reduction of
supine and standing blood pressures. These decreases in blood pressure are not
accompanied by a significant change in heart rate or plasma catecholamine levels
with chronic dosing. Although the acute intravenous administration of amlodipine
decreases arterial blood pressure and increases heart rate in hemodynamic
studies of patients with chronic stable angina, chronic administration of oral
amlodipine in clinical trials did not lead to clinically significant changes in
heart rate or blood pressures in normotensive patients with angina.
With chronic once daily oral administration of amlodipine, antihypertensive
effectiveness is maintained for at least 24 hours. Plasma concentrations
correlate with effect in both young and elderly patients. The magnitude of
reduction in blood pressure with amlodipine is also correlated with the height
of pretreatment elevation; thus, individuals with moderate hypertension
(diastolic pressure 105–114 mmHg) had about a 50% greater response than patients
with mild hypertension (diastolic pressure 90–104 mmHg). Normotensive subjects
experienced no clinically significant change in blood pressures (+1/–2
mmHg).
In hypertensive patients with normal renal function, therapeutic doses of
amlodipine resulted in a decrease in renal vascular resistance and an increase
in glomerular filtration rate and effective renal plasma flow without change in
filtration fraction or proteinuria.
As with other calcium channel blockers, hemodynamic measurements of cardiac
function at rest and during exercise (or pacing) in patients with normal
ventricular function treated with amlodipine have generally demonstrated a small
increase in cardiac index without significant influence on dP/dt or on left
ventricular end diastolic pressure or volume. In hemodynamic studies, amlodipine
has not been associated with a negative inotropic effect when administered in
the therapeutic dose range to intact animals and man, even when co-administered
with beta-blockers to man. Similar findings, however, have been observed in
normals or well-compensated patients with heart failure with agents possessing
significant negative inotropic effects.
Electrophysiologic Effects of Amlodipine
Amlodipine does not change sinoatrial nodal function or
atrioventricular conduction in intact animals or man. In patients with chronic
stable angina, intravenous administration of 10 mg did not significantly alter
A-H and H-V conduction and sinus node recovery time after pacing. Similar
results were obtained in patients receiving amlodipine and concomitant beta
blockers. In clinical studies in which amlodipine was administered in
combination with beta-blockers to patients with either hypertension or angina,
no adverse effects on electrocardiographic parameters were observed. In clinical
trials with angina patients alone, amlodipine therapy did not alter
electrocardiographic intervals or produce higher degrees of AV blocks.
LDL-C Reduction with Atorvastatin
Atorvastatin as well as some of its metabolites are
pharmacologically active in humans. The liver is the primary site of action and
the principal site of cholesterol synthesis and LDL clearance. Drug dosage,
rather than systemic drug concentration, correlates better with LDL-C reduction.
Individualization of drug dosage should be based on therapeutic response (see
DOSAGE AND
ADMINISTRATION).
Clinical StudiesClinical Studies with AmlodipineAmlodipine Effects in HypertensionAdult Patients
The antihypertensive efficacy of amlodipine has been demonstrated
in a total of 15 double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized studies involving
800 patients on amlodipine and 538 on placebo. Once daily administration
produced statistically significant placebo-corrected reductions in supine and
standing blood pressures at 24 hours postdose, averaging about 12/6 mmHg in the
standing position and 13/7 mmHg in the supine position in patients with mild to
moderate hypertension. Maintenance of the blood pressure effect over the 24-hour
dosing interval was observed, with little difference in peak and trough effect.
Tolerance was not demonstrated in patients studied for up to 1 year. The 3
parallel, fixed doses, dose response studies showed that the reduction in supine
and standing blood pressures was dose-related within the recommended dosing
range. Effects on diastolic pressure were similar in young and older patients.
The effect on systolic pressure was greater in older patients, perhaps because
of greater baseline systolic pressure. Effects were similar in black patients
and in white patients.
Pediatric Patients
Two-hundred sixty-eight hypertensive patients aged 6 to 17 years
were randomized first to amlodipine 2.5 or 5 mg once daily for 4 weeks and then
randomized again to the same dose or to placebo for another 4 weeks. Patients
receiving 5 mg amlodipine at the end of 8 weeks had lower blood pressure than
those secondarily randomized to placebo. The magnitude of the treatment effect
is difficult to interpret, but it is probably less than 5 mmHg systolic on the 5
mg dose. Adverse events were similar to those seen in adults.
Amlodipine Effects in Chronic Stable Angina
The effectiveness of 5–10 mg/day of amlodipine in
exercise-induced angina has been evaluated in 8 placebo-controlled, double-blind
clinical trials of up to 6 weeks duration involving 1038 patients (684
amlodipine, 354 placebo) with chronic stable angina. In 5 of the 8 studies,
significant increases in exercise time (bicycle or treadmill) were seen with the
10 mg dose. Increases in symptom-limited exercise time averaged 12.8% (63 sec)
for amlodipine 10 mg, and averaged 7.9% (38 sec) for amlodipine 5 mg. Amlodipine
10 mg also increased time to 1 mm ST segment deviation in several studies and
decreased angina attack rate. The sustained efficacy of amlodipine in angina
patients has been demonstrated over long-term dosing. In patients with angina,
there were no clinically significant reductions in blood pressures (4/1 mmHg) or
changes in heart rate (+0.3 bpm).
Amlodipine Effects in Vasospastic Angina
In a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of 4 weeks
duration in 50 patients, amlodipine therapy decreased attacks by approximately
4/week compared with a placebo decrease of approximately 1/week (p less than 0.01). Two
of 23 amlodipine and 7 of 27 placebo patients discontinued from the study due to
lack of clinical improvement.
Amlodipine Effects in Documented Coronary Artery
Disease
In PREVENT, 825 patients with angiographically documented
coronary artery disease were randomized to amlodipine (5–10 mg once daily) or
placebo and followed for 3 years. Although the study did not show significance
on the primary objective of change in coronary luminal diameter as assessed by
quantitative coronary angiography, the data suggested a favorable outcome with
respect to fewer hospitalizations for angina and revascularization procedures in
patients with CAD.
CAMELOT enrolled 1318 patients with CAD recently documented by angiography,
without left main coronary disease and without heart failure or an ejection
fraction less than 40%. Patients (76% males, 89% Caucasian, 93% enrolled at US sites,
89% with a history of angina, 52% without PCI, 4% with PCI and no stent, and 44%
with a stent) were randomized to double-blind treatment with either amlodipine
(5 – 10 mg once daily) or placebo in addition to standard care that included
aspirin (89%), statins (83%), beta-blockers (74%), nitroglycerin (50%),
anti-coagulants (40%), and diuretics (32%), but excluded other calcium channel
blockers. The mean duration of follow-up was 19 months. The primary endpoint was
the time to first occurrence of one of the following events: hospitalization for
angina pectoris, coronary revascularization, myocardial infarction,
cardiovascular death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, hospitalization for heart
failure, stroke/TIA, or peripheral vascular disease. A total of 110 (16.6%) and
151 (23.1%) first events occurred in the amlodipine and placebo groups
respectively for a hazard ratio of 0.691 (95% CI: 0.540–0.884, p= 0.003). The
primary endpoint is summarized in Figure 1 below. The outcome of this study was
largely derived from the prevention of hospitalizations for angina and the
prevention of revascularization procedures (see Table 4).
Effects in various subgroups are shown in Figure 2.
In a angiographic substudy (n=274) conducted within CAMELOT, there was no
significant difference between amlodipine and placebo on the change of atheroma
volume in the coronary artery as assessed by intravascular ultrasound.
Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier analysis of composite clinical outcomes
for amlodipineversus placeboFigure 2 – Effects on primary endpoint of amlodipine versus
placebo across sub-groupsTable 4 below summarizes the significant composite endpoint and clinical
outcomes from the composites of the primary endpoint. The other components of
the primary endpoint including cardiovascular death, resuscitated cardiac
arrest, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for heart failure, stroke/TIA, or
peripheral vascular disease did not demonstrate a significant difference between
amlodipine and placebo.
Table 4. Incidence of Significant Clinical Outcomes for CAMELOT Clinical Outcomes N (%)
| Amlodipine (N=663)
| Placebo (N=655)
| Risk Reduction (p-value)
|
Composite CV
| 110 | 151 | 31%
|
Endpoint
| (16.6)
| (23.1)
| (0.003) |
Hospitalization for
| 51
| 84
| 42%
|
| Angina * | (7.7)
| (12.8)
| (0.002)
|
Coronary
| 78
| 103
| 27%
|
| Revascularization * | (11.8)
| (15.7)
| (0.033)
|
* Total patients with these events
Amlodipine Effects in Patients with Congestive Heart
Failure
Amlodipine has been compared to placebo in four 8–12 week studies
of patients with NYHA class II/III heart failure, involving a total of 697
patients. In these studies, there was no evidence of worsened heart failure
based on measures of exercise tolerance, NYHA classification, symptoms, or LVEF.
In a long-term (follow-up at least 6 months, mean 13.8 months)
placebo-controlled mortality/morbidity study of amlodipine 5–10 mg in 1153
patients with NYHA classes III (n=931) or IV (n=222) heart failure on stable
doses of diuretics, digoxin, and ACE inhibitors, amlodipine had no effect on the
primary endpoint of the study which was the combined endpoint of all-cause
mortality and cardiac morbidity (as defined by life-threatening arrhythmia,
acute myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for worsened heart failure), or
on NYHA classification, or symptoms of heart failure. Total combined all-cause
mortality and cardiac morbidity events were 222/571 (39%) for patients on
amlodipine and 246/583 (42%) for patients on placebo; the cardiac morbid events
represented about 25% of the endpoints in the study.
Another study (PRAISE-2) randomized patients with NYHA class III (80%) or IV
(20%) heart failure without clinical symptoms or objective evidence of
underlying ischemic disease, on stable doses of ACE inhibitor (99%), digitalis
(99%) and diuretics (99%), to placebo (n=827) or amlodipine (n=827) and followed
them for a mean of 33 months. There was no statistically significant difference
between amlodipine and placebo in the primary endpoint of all cause mortality
(95% confidence limits from 8% reduction to 29% increase on amlodipine). With
amlodipine there were more reports of pulmonary edema.
Clinical Studies with Atorvastatin Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease
In the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT), the
effect of atorvastatin on fatal and non-fatal coronary heart disease was
assessed in 10,305 hypertensive patients 40–80 years of age (mean of 63 years),
without a previous myocardial infarction and with TC levels less than or equal to 251 mg/dl (6.5
mmol/l). Additionally all patients had at least 3 of the following
cardiovascular risk factors: male gender (81.1%), age greater than 55 years (84.5%),
smoking (33.2%), diabetes (24.3%), history of CHD in a first-degree relative
(26%), TC:HDL greater than 6 (14.3%), peripheral vascular disease (5.1%), left
ventricular hypertrophy (14.4%), prior cerebrovascular event (9.8%), specific
ECG abnormality (14.3%), proteinuria/albuminuria (62.4%)]. In this double-blind,
placebo-controlled study, patients were treated with anti-hypertensive therapy
(Goal BP less than 140/90 mm Hg for non-diabetic patients; less than 130/80 mm Hg for
diabetic patients) and allocated to either atorvastatin 10 mg daily (n=5168) or
placebo (n=5137), using a covariate adaptive method which took into account the
distribution of nine baseline characteristics of patients already enrolled and
minimized the imbalance of those characteristics across the groups. Patients
were followed for a median duration of 3.3 years.
The effect of 10 mg/day of atorvastatin on lipid levels was similar to that
seen in previous clinical trials.
Atorvastatin significantly reduced the rate of coronary events [either fatal
coronary heart disease (46 events in the placebo group vs. 40 events in the
atorvastatin group) or nonfatal MI (108 events in the placebo group vs. 60
events in the atorvastatin group)] with a relative risk reduction of 36% [(based
on incidences of 1.9% for atorvastatin vs. 3.0% for placebo), p=0.0005 (see Figure 3)]. The risk reduction was consistent regardless of
age, smoking status, obesity, or presence of renal dysfunction. The effect of
atorvastatin was seen regardless of baseline LDL levels. Due to the small number
of events, results for women were inconclusive.
Figure 3: Effect of Atorvastatin 10 mg/day on Cumulative
Incidence of Nonfatal
Myocardial Infarction or Coronary Heart Disease Death
(in ASCOT-LLA)
Atorvastatin also significantly decreased the relative risk for
revascularization procedures by 42%. Although the reduction of fatal and
non-fatal strokes did not reach a pre-defined significance level (p 0.01), a
favorable trend was observed with a 26% relative risk reduction (incidences of
1.7% for atorvastatin and 2.3% for placebo). There was no significant difference
between the treatment groups for death due to cardiovascular causes (p=0.51) or
noncardiovascular causes (p=0.17).
In the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS), the effect of
atorvastatin on cardiovascular disease (CVD) endpoints was assessed in 2838
subjects (94% White, 68% male), ages 40–75 with type 2 diabetes based on WHO
criteria, without prior history of cardiovascular disease and with LDL less than or equal to 160
mg/dL and TG less than or equal to 600 mg/dL. In addition to diabetes, subjects had 1 or more of the
following risk factors: current smoking (23%), hypertension (80%), retinopathy
(30%), or microalbuminuria (9%) or macroalbuminuria (3%). No subjects on
hemodialysis were enrolled in the study. In this multicenter,
placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial, subjects were randomly
allocated to either atorvastatin 10 mg daily (1429) or placebo (1411) in a 1:1
ratio and were followed for a median duration of 3.9 years. The primary endpoint
was the occurrence of any of the major cardiovascular events: myocardial
infarction, acute CHD death, unstable angina, coronary revascularization, or
stroke. The primary analysis was the time to first occurrence of the primary
endpoint.
Baseline characteristics of subjects were: mean age of 62 years, mean
HbA1c 7.7%; median LDL-C 120 mg/dL; median TC 207 mg/dL;
median TG 151 mg/dL; median HDL-C 52 mg/dL.
The effect of atorvastatin 10 mg/day on lipid levels was similar to that seen
in previous clinical trials.
Atorvastatin significantly reduced the rate of major cardiovascular events
(primary endpoint events) (83 events in the atorvastatin group vs 127 events in
the placebo group) with a relative risk reduction of 37%, HR 0.63, 95% CI
(0.48,0.83) (p=0.001) (see Figure 4). An effect of
atorvastatin was seen regardless of age, sex, or baseline lipid levels.
Figure 4. Effect of Atorvastatin 10 mg/day on Time to
Occurrence of Major
Cardiovascular Events (myocardial infarction, acute CHD
death, unstable angina,
coronary revascularization, or stroke) in
CARDS.
Atorvastatin significantly reduced the risk of stroke by 48% (21 events in
the atorvastatin group vs. 39 events in the placebo group), HR 0.52, 95% CI
(0.31, 0.89) (p=0.016) and reduced the risk of MI by 42% (38 events in the
atorvastatin group vs. 64 events in the placebo group), HR 0.58, 95.1% CI (0.39,
0.86) (p=0.007). There was no significant difference between the treatment
groups for angina, revascularization procedures, and acute CHD death.
There were 61 deaths in the atorvastatin group vs. 82 deaths in the placebo
group, (HR 0.73, p=0.059).
In the Treating to New Targets Study (TNT), the effect of LIPITOR 80 mg/day
vs. LIPITOR 10 mg/day on the reduction in cardiovascular events was assessed in
10,001 subjects (94% white, 81% male, 38% greater than or equal to 65 years) with clinically evident
coronary heart disease who had achieved a target LDL-C level less than 130 mg/dL after
completing an 8-week, open-label, run-in period with LIPITOR 10 mg/day. Subjects
were randomly assigned to either 10 mg/day or 80 mg/day of LIPITOR and followed
for a median duration of 4.9 years. The primary endpoint was the time-to-first
occurrence of any of the following major cardiovascular events (MCVE): death due
to CHD, non-fatal myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and fatal
and non-fatal stroke. The mean LDL-C, TC, TG, non-HDL, and HDL cholesterol
levels at 12 weeks were 73, 145, 128, 98, and 47 mg/dL during treatment with 80
mg of LIPITOR and 99, 177, 152, 129, and 48 mg/dL during treatment with 10 mg of
LIPITOR.
Treatment with LIPITOR 80 mg/day significantly reduced the rate of MCVE (434
events in the 80mg/day group vs. 548 events in the 10 mg/day group) with a
relative risk reduction of 22%, HR 0.78, 95% CI (0.69,0.89), p=0.0002 (see Figure5 and Table 5). The overall risk
reduction was consistent regardless of age (less than 65, greate than or equal to 65) or gender.
Figure 5. Effect of LIPITOR 80 mg/day vs. 10 mg/day on Time to
Occurrence of
Major Cardiovascular Events (TNT)
TABLE 5. Overview of Efficacy Results in TNTEndpoint
| Atorvastatin 10 mg (N=5006)
|
| Atorvastatin 80
mg
(N=4995)
|
| HR* (95%CI)
|
PRIMARY ENDPOINT
| n
| (%)
| n
| (%)
|
|
First major cardiovascular endpoint
| 548
| (10.9)
| 434
| (8.7)
| 0.78 (0.69, 0.89)
|
Components of the Primary Endpoint
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHD death
| 127
| (2.5)
| 101
| (2.0)
| 0.80 (0.61, 103)
|
Non-fatal, non-procedure related MI
| 308
| (6.2)
| 243
| (4.9)
| 0.78 (0.66, 0.93)
|
Resuscitated cardiac arrest
| 26
| (0.5)
| 25
| (0.5)
| 0.96 (0.56, 1.67)
|
Stroke (fatal and non-fatal)
| 155
| (3.1)
| 117
| (2.3)
| 0.75 (0.59, 0.96)
|
| SECONDARY ENDPOINTS† |
|
|
|
|
|
First CHF with hospitalization
| 164
| (3.3)
| 122
| (2.4)
| 0.74 (0.59, 0.94)
|
First PVD endpoint
| 282
| (5.6)
| 275
| (5.5)
| 0.97 (0.83, 1.15)
|
First CABG or other coronary revascularization procedure‡ | 904
| (18.1)
| 667
| (13.4)
| 0.72 (0.65, 0.80)
|
| First documented angina endpoint‡ | 615
| 12.3)
| 545
| (10.9)
| 0.88 (0.79, 0.99)
|
All cause mortality
| 282
| (5.6)
| 284
| (5.7)
| 1.01 (0.85, 1.19)
|
Components of all cause mortality
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cardiovascular death
| 155
| (3.1)
| 126
| (2.5)
| 0.81 (0.64, 1.03)
|
Noncardiovascular death
| 127
| (2.5)
| 158
| (3.2)
| 1.25 (0.99, 1.57)
|
Cancer death
| 75
| (1.5)
| 85
| (1.7)
| 1.13 (0.83, 1.55)
|
Other non-CV death
| 43
| (0.9)
| 58
| (1.2)
| 1.35 (0.91, 2.00)
|
Suicide, homicide and other traumatic non-CV death
| 9
| (0.2)
| 15
| (0.3)
| 1.67 (0.73, 3.82)
|
HR=hazard ratio, CHD =coronary heart disease; CI=confidence interval; MI=myocardial infarction;
CHF=congestive heart failure;
CV=cardiovascular; PVD=peripheral vascular disease; CABG=coronary artery bypass
graft
Confidence intervals for the Secondary Endpoints were not adjusted for multiple
comparisons.
* Atorvastatin 80 mg: atorvastatin 10 mg
† Secondary endpoints not included in primary endpoint
‡ Component of other secondary endpoints
Of the events that comprised the primary efficacy endpoint, treatment with
LIPITOR 80 mg/day significantly reduced the rate of non-fatal, non-procedure
related MI and fatal and non-fatal stroke, but not CHD death or resuscitated
cardiac arrest (Table 5). Of the predefined secondary
endpoints, treatment with LIPITOR 80 mg/day significantly reduced the rate of
coronary revascularization, angina, and hospitalization for heart failure, but
not peripheral vascular disease. The reduction in the rate of CHF with
hospitalization was only observed in the 8% of patients with a prior history of
CHF.
There was no significant difference between the treatment groups for
all-cause mortality (Table 5). The proportions of subjects
who experienced cardiovascular death, including the components of CHD death and
fatal stroke, were numerically smaller in the LIPITOR 80 mg group than in the
LIPITOR 10 mg treatment group. The proportions of subjects who experienced
noncardiovascular death were numerically larger in the LIPITOR 80 mg group than
in the LIPITOR 10 mg treatment group.
In the Incremental Decrease in Endpoints Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering
Study (IDEAL), treatment with LIPITOR 80 mg/day was compared to treatment with
simvastatin 20–40 mg/day in 8,888 subjects up to 80 years of age with a history
of CHD to assess whether reduction in CV risk could be achieved. Patients were
mainly male (81%), white (99%) with an average age of 61.7 years, and an average
LDL-C of 121.5 mg/dL at randomization; 76% were on statin therapy. In this
prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) trial with no
run-in period, subjects were followed for a median duration of 4.8 years. The
mean LDL-C, TC, TG, HDL, and non-HDL cholesterol levels at Week 12 were 78, 145,
115, 45, and 100 mg/dL during treatment with 80 mg of LIPITOR and 105, 179, 142,
47, and 132 mg/dL during treatment with 20–40 mg of simvastatin.
There was no significant difference between the treatment groups for the
primary endpoint, the rate of first major coronary event (fatal CHD, nonfatal MI
and resuscitated cardiac arrest): 411 (9.3%) in the LIPITOR 80 mg/day group vs.
463 (10.4%) in the simvastatin 20–40 mg/day group, HR 0.89, 95% CI ( 0.78,
1.01), p=0.07.
There were no significant differences between the treatment groups for
all-cause mortality: 366 (8.2%) in the LIPITOR 80 mg/day group vs. 374 (8.4%) in
the simvastatin 20–40 mg/day group. The proportions of subjects who experienced
CV or non-CV death were similar for the LIPITOR 80 mg group and the simvastatin
20–40 mg group.
Atorvastatin Studies in Hyperlipidemia (Heterozygous
Familial and Nonfamilial) and Mixed Dyslipidemia (Fredrickson Types IIa and
IIb)
Atorvastatin reduces total-C, LDL-C, VLDL-C, apo B, and TG, and
increases HDL-C in patients with hyperlipidemia and mixed dyslipidemia.
Therapeutic response is seen within 2 weeks, and maximum response is usually
achieved within 4 weeks and maintained during chronic therapy.
Atorvastatin is effective in a wide variety of patient populations with
hyperlipidemia, with and without hypertriglyceridemia, in men and women, and in
the elderly.
In two multicenter, placebo-controlled, dose-response studies in patients
with hyperlipidemia, atorvastatin given as a single dose over 6 weeks,
significantly reduced total-C, LDL-C, apo B, and TG (pooled results are provided
in Table 6).
Table 6. Dose-Response in Patients With Primary Hyperlipidemia (Adjusted Mean Percent Change From Baseline)*Dose
| N
| TC
| LDL-C
| Apo B
| TG
| HDL-C
| Non-HDL-C/ HDL-C
|
Placebo
| 21
| 4
| 4
| 3
| 10
| -3
| 7
|
10
| 22
| -29
| -39
| -32
| -19
| 6
| -34
|
20
| 20
| -33
| -43
| -35
| -26
| 9
| -41
|
40
| 21
| -37
| -50
| -42
| -29
| 6
| -45
|
80
| 23
| -45
| -60
| -50
| -37
| 5
| -53
|
* Results are pooled from 2 dose-response studies.
In patients with Fredrickson Types IIa and IIb
hyperlipoproteinemia pooled from 24 controlled trials, the median (25th and 75th percentile) percent changes
from baseline in HDL-C for atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, and 80 mg were 6.4 (-1.4,
14), 8.7 (0, 17), 7.8 (0, 16), and 5.1 (-2.7, 15), respectively. Additionally,
analysis of the pooled data demonstrated consistent and significant decreases in
total-C, LDL-C, TG, total-C/HDL-C, and LDL-C/HDL-C.
In three multicenter, double-blind studies in patients with hyperlipidemia,
atorvastatin was compared to other statins. After randomization, patients were
treated for 16 weeks with either atorvastatin 10 mg per day or a fixed dose of
the comparative agent (Table 7).
Table 7. Mean Percent Change From Baseline at Endpoint (Double-Blind, Randomized, Active-Controlled Trials)Treatment (Daily Dose)
| N
| Total-C
| LDL-C
| Apo B
| TG
| HDL-C
| Non-HDL-C/ HDL-C
|
Study 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Atorvastatin 10 mg | 707
| -27* | -36* | -28* | -17* | +7
| -37* |
Lovastatin 20 mg
| 191
| -19
| -27
| -20
| -6
| +7
| -28
|
| 95% CI for Diff† |
| -9.2, -6.5
| -10.7, -7.1
| -10.0, -6.5
| -15.2, -7.1
| -1.7, 2.0
| -11.1, -7.1
|
Study 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Atorvastatin 10 mg | 222
| -25‡ | -35‡ | -27‡ | -17‡ | +6
| -36‡ |
Pravastatin 20 mg
| 77
| -17
| -23
| -17
| -9
| +8
| -28
|
| 95% CI for Diff† |
| -10.8, -6.1
| -14.5, -8.2
| -13.4, -7.4
| -14.1, -0.7
| -4.9, 1.6
| -11.5, -4.1
|
Study 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Atorvastatin 10 mg | 132
| -29§ | -37§ | -34§ | -23§ | +7
| -39§ |
Simvastatin 10 mg
| 45
| -24
| -30
| -30
| -15
| +7
| -33
|
| 95% CI for Diff† |
| -8.7, -2.7
| -10.1, -2.6
| -8.0, -1.1
| -15.1, -0.7
| -4.3, 3.9
| -9.6, -1.9
|
* Significantly different from lovastatin, ANCOVA, p less than or equal to 0.05
† A negative value for the 95% CI for the difference between treatments favors
atorvastatin for all except HDL-C, for which a positive value favors
atorvastatin. If the range does not include 0, this indicates a statistically
significant difference.
‡ Significantly different from pravastatin, ANCOVA, p less than or equal to 0.05
§ Significantly different from simvastatin, ANCOVA, p less than or equal to 0.05
The impact on clinical outcomes of the differences in lipid-altering effects
between treatments shown in Table 7 is not known. Table 7 does not contain data
comparing the effects of atorvastatin 10 mg and higher doses of lovastatin,
pravastatin, and simvastatin. The drugs compared in the studies summarized in
the table are not necessarily interchangeable.
Atorvastatin Effects in Hypertriglyceridemia
(Fredrickson Type IV)
The response to atorvastatin in 64 patients with isolated
hypertriglyceridemia treated across several clinical trials is shown in the
table below (Table 8). For the atorvastatin-treated patients, median (min, max)
baseline TG level was 565 (267–1502).
Table 8. Combined Patients With Isolated Elevated TG: Median (min, max)
Percent Changes From Baseline
| Placebo (N=12) | Atorvastatin 10 mg (N=37) | Atorvastatin 20 mg (N=13) | Atorvastatin 80 mg (N=14) |
|---|
| Triglycerides | -12.4 (-36.6, 82.7) | -41.0 (-76.2, 49.4) | -38.7 (-62.7, 29.5) | -51.8 (-82.8, 41.3) |
| Total-C | -2.3 (-15.5, 24.4) | -28.2 (-44.9, -6.8) | -34.9 (-49.6, -15.2) | -44.4 (-63.5, -3.8) |
| LDL-C | 3.6 (-31.3, 31.6) | -26.5 (-57.7, 9.8) | -30.4 (-53.9, 0.3) | -40.5 (-60.6, -13.8) |
| HDL-C | 3.8 (-18.6, 13.4) | 13.8 (-9.7, 61.5) | 11.0 (-3.2, 25.2) | 7.5 (-10.8, 37.2) |
| VLDL-C | -1.0 (-31.9, 53.2) | -48.8 (-85.8, 57.3) | -44.6 (-62.2, -10.8) | -62.0 (-88.2, 37.6) |
| non-HDL-C | -2.8 (-17.6, 30.0) | -33.0 (-52.1, -13.3) | -42.7 (-53.7, -17.4) | -51.5 (-72.9, -4.3) |
Atorvastatin Effects in Dysbetalipoproteinemia
(Fredrickson Type III)
The results of an open-label crossover study of atorvastatin in
16 patients (genotypes: 14 apo E2/E2 and 2 apo E3/E2) with
dysbetalipoproteinemia (Fredrickson Type III) are
shown in the table below (Table 9).
Table 9. Open-Label Crossover Study of 16 Patients With
Dysbetalipoproteinemia (Fredrickson Type III)
|
| Median % Change (min, max) |
|---|
| Median (min, max) at Baseline (mg/dL) | Atorvastatin 10 mg | Atorvastatin 80 mg |
|---|
| Total-C | 442 (225, 1320) | -37 (-85, 17) | -58 (-90, -31) |
| Triglycerides | 678 (273, 5990) | -39 (-92, -8) | -53 (-95, -30) |
| IDL-C + VLDL-C | 215 (111, 613) | -32 (-76, 9) | -63 (-90, -8) |
| non-HDL-C | 411 (218, 1272) | -43 (-87, -19) | -64 (-92, -36) |
Atorvastatin Effects in Homozygous Familial
Hypercholesterolemia
In a study without a concurrent control group, 29 patients ages 6
to 37 years with homozygous FH received maximum daily doses of 20 to 80 mg of
atorvastatin. The mean LDL-C reduction in this study was 18%. Twenty-five
patients with a reduction in LDL-C had a mean response of 20% (range of 7% to
53%, median of 24%); the remaining 4 patients had 7% to 24% increases in LDL-C.
Five of the 29 patients had absent LDL-receptor function. Of these, 2 patients
also had a portacaval shunt and had no significant reduction in LDL-C. The
remaining 3 receptor-negative patients had a mean LDL-C reduction of 22%.
Atorvastatin Effects in Heterozygous Familial
Hypercholesterolemic Pediatric Patients
In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study followed by an
open-label phase, 187 boys and postmenarchal girls 10–17 years of age (mean age
14.1 years) with heterozygous FH or severe hypercholesterolemia, were randomized
to atorvastatin (n=140) or placebo (n=47) for 26 weeks and then all received
atorvastatin for 26 weeks. Inclusion in the study required 1) a baseline LDL-C
level ≥ 190 mg/dL or 2) a baseline LDL-C level ≥ 160 mg/dL and positive family
history of FH or documented premature cardiovascular disease in a first- or
second-degree relative. The mean baseline LDL-C value was 218.6 mg/dL (range:
138.5–385.0 mg/dL) in the atorvastatin group compared to 230.0 mg/dL (range:
160.0–324.5 mg/dL) in placebo group. The dosage of atorvastatin (once daily) was
10 mg for the first 4 weeks and up-titrated to 20 mg if the LDL-C level was >
130 mg/dL. The number of atorvastatin-treated patients who required up-titration
to 20 mg after Week 4 during the double-blind phase was 80 (57.1%).
Atorvastatin significantly decreased plasma levels of total-C, LDL-C,
triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B during the 26 week double-blind phase (see
Table 10).
Table 10. Lipid-altering Effects of Atorvastatin in Adolescent Boys and
Girls with Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia or Severe
Hypercholesterolemia (Mean Percent Change From Baseline at Endpoint in
Intention-to-Treat Population)| DOSAGE | N | Total-C | LDL-C | HDL-C | TG | Apolipoprotein B |
|---|
| Placebo | 47 | -1.5 | -0.4 | -1.9 | 1.0 | 0.7 |
| Atorvastatin | 140 | -31.4 | -39.6 | 2.8 | -12.0 | -34.0 |
The mean achieved LDL-C value was 130.7 mg/dL (range: 70.0–242.0 mg/dL) in
the atorvastatin group compared to 228.5 mg/dL (range: 152.0–385.0 mg/dL) in the
placebo group during the 26 week double-blind phase.
The safety and efficacy of atorvastatin doses above 20 mg have not been
studied in controlled trials in children. The long-term efficacy of atorvastatin
therapy in childhood to reduce morbidity and mortality in adulthood has not been
established.
Clinical Study of Combined Amlodipine and
Atorvastatin in Patients with Hypertension and Dyslipidemia
In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, a total of 1660
patients with co-morbid hypertension and dyslipidemia received once daily
treatment with eight dose combinations of amlodipine and atorvastatin (5/10,
10/10, 5/20, 10/20, 5/40, 10/40, 5/80, or 10/80 mg), amlodipine alone (5 mg or
10 mg), atorvastatin alone (10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg) or placebo. In addition to concomitant hypertension and dyslipidemia,
15% of the patients had diabetes mellitus, 22% were smokers and 14% had a
positive family history of cardiovascular disease. At eight weeks, all eight
combination-treatment groups of amlodipine and atorvastatin demonstrated
statistically significant dose-related reductions in systolic blood pressure
(SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and LDL-C compared to placebo, with no
overall modification of effect of either component on SBP, DBP and LDL-C (Table 11).
Table 11. Efficacy in Terms of Reduction in Blood Pressure and
LDL-C| Efficacy of the Combined Treatments in
Reducing Systolic BP |
| Parameter / Analysis | ATO 0 mg | ATO 10 mg | ATO 20 mg | ATO 40 mg | ATO 80 mg |
| Mean change (mmHg) | -3.0 | -4.5 | -6.2 | -6.2 | -6.4 |
| AML 0 mg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Difference versus placebo (mmHg) | - | -1.5 | -3.2 | -3.2 | -3.4 |
| Mean change (mmHg) | -12.8 | -13.7 | -15.3 | -12.7 | -12.2 |
| AML 5 mg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Difference versus placebo (mmHg) | -9.8 | -10.7 | -12.3 | -9.7 | -9.2 |
| Mean change (mmHg) | -16.2 | -15.9 | -16.1 | -16.3 | -17.6 |
| AML 10 mg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Difference versus placebo (mmHg) | -13.2 | -12.9 | -13.1 | -13.3 | -14.6 |
|
| Efficacy of the Combined Treatments in Reducing
Diastolic BP |
| Parameter / Analysis | ATO 0 mg | ATO 10 mg | ATO 20 mg | ATO 40 mg | ATO 80 mg |
| Mean change (mmHg) | -3.3 | -4.1 | -3.9 | -5.1 | -4.1 |
| AML 0 mg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Difference versus placebo (mmHg) | - | -0.8 | -0.6 | -1.8 | -0.8 |
| Mean change (mmHg) | -7.6 | -8.2 | -9.4 | -7.3 | -8.4 |
| AML 5 mg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Difference versus placebo (mmHg) | -4.3 | -4.9 | -6.1 | -4.0 | -5.1 |
| Mean change (mmHg) | -10.4 | -9.1 | -10.6 | -9.8 | -11.1 |
| AML 10 mg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Difference versus placebo (mmHg) | -7.1 | -5.8 | -7.3 | -6.5 | -7.8 |
|
| Efficacy of the Combined Treatments in Reducing LDL-C
(% change) |
| Parameter / Analysis | ATO 0 mg | ATO 10 mg | ATO 20 mg | ATO 40 mg | ATO 80 mg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AML 0 mg | Mean % change | -1.1 | -33.4 | -39.5 | -43.1 | -47.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AML 5 mg | Mean % change | -0.1 | -38.7 | -42.3 | -44.9 | -48.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AML 10 mg | Mean % change | -2.5 | -36.6 | -38.6 | -43.2 | -49.1 |
|
|
|