Other
To reduce the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain the effectiveness of azithromycin for oral suspension and other antibacterial drugs, azithromycin for oral suspension should be used only to treat or prevent infections that are proven or strongly suspected to be caused by bacteria.
Drug-Drug InteractionsDrug interaction studies were performed with azithromycin and other drugs likely to be co-administered. The effects of co-administration of azithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of other drugs are shown in Table 1 and the effect of other drugs on the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin are shown in Table 2.
Co-administration of azithromycin at therapeutic doses had a modest effect on the pharmacokinetics of the drugs listed in Table 1. No dosage adjustment of drugs listed in Table 1 is recommended when co-administered with azithromycin.
Co-administration of azithromycin with efavirenz or fluconazole had a modest effect on the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin. Nelfinavir significantly increased the Cmax and AUC of azithromycin. No dosage adjustment of azithromycin is recommended when administered with drugs listed in Table 2. (See PRECAUTIONS - Drug Interactions.)
| Co-administered Drug | Dose of Co- administered Drug | Dose of Azithromycin | n | Ratio (with/without azithromycin) Pharmacokinetic Parameters | of Co-administered Drug (90% CI); No Effect = 1.00 |
| Mean Cmax | Mean AUC | ||||
| Atorvastatin | 10 mg/day x 8 days | 500 mg/day PO on days 6-8 | 12 | 0.83 (0.63 to 1.08) | 1.01 (0.81 to 1.25) |
| Carbamazepine | 200 mg/day x 2 days, ten 200 mg BID x 18 days | 500 mg/day PO for days 16-18 | 7 | 0.97 (0.88 to 1.06) | 0.96 (0.88 to 1.06) |
| Cetirizine | 20 mg/day x 11 days | 500 mg PO on day 7, then 250 mg/day on days 8–11 | 14 | 1.03 (0.93 to 1.14) | 1.02 (0.92 to 1.13) |
| Didanosine | 200 mg PO BID × 21 days | 1,200 mg/day PO on days 8–21 | 6 | 1.44 (0.85 to 2.43) | 1.14 (0.83 to 1.57) |
| Efavirenz | 400 mg/day × 7 days | 600 mg PO on day 7 | 14 | 1.04* | 0.95* |
| Fluconazole | 200 mg PO single dose | 1,200 mg PO single dose | 18 | 1.04 (0.98 to 1.11) | 1.01 (0.97 to 1.05) |
| Indinavir | 800 mg TID × 5 days | 1,200 mg PO on day 5 | 18 | 0.96 (0.86 to 1.08) | 0.90 (0.81 to 1.00) |
| Midazolam | 15 mg PO on day 3 | 500 mg/day PO x 3 days | 12 | 1.27 (0.89 to 1.81) | 1.26 (1.01 to 1.56) |
| Nelfinavir | 750 mg TID × 11 days | 1,200 mg PO on day 9 | 14 | 0.90 (0.81 to 1.01) | 0.85 (0.78 to 0.93) |
| Rifabutin | 300 mg/day × 10 days | 500 mg PO on day 1, then 250 mg/day on days 2-10 | 6 | See footnote below | NA |
| Sildenafil | 100 mg on days 1 and 4 | 500 mg/day PO x 3 days | 12 | 1.16 (0.86 to 1.57) | 0.92 (0.75 to 1.12) |
| Theophylline | 4 mg/kg IV on days 1, 11, 25 | 500 mg PO on day 7, 250 mg/day on days 8-11 | 10 | 1.19 (1.02 to 1.40) | 1.02 (0.86 to 1.22) |
| Theophylline | 300 mg PO BID × 15 days | 500 mg PO on day 6, then 250 mg/day on days 7-10 | 8 | 1.09 (0.92 to 1.29) | 1.08 (0.89 to 1.31) |
| Triazolam | 0.125 mg on day 2 | 500 mg PO on day 1, then 250 mg/day on day 2 | 12 | 1.06* | 1.02* |
| Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole | 160 mg/800 mg/day PO × 7 days | 1,200 mg PO on day 7 | 12 | 0.85 (0.75 to 0.97)/ 0.90 (0.78 to 1.03) | 0.87 (0.80 to 0.95)/ 0.96 (0.88 to 1.03) |
| Zidovudine | 500 mg/day PO x 21 days | 600 mg/day PO x 14 days | 5 | 1.12 (0.42 to 3.02) | 0.94 (0.52 to 1.70) |
| Zidovudine | 500 mg/day PO x 21 days | 1,200 mg/day PO x 14 days | 4 | 1.31 (0.43 to 3.97) | 1.30 (0.69 to 2.43) |
Mean rifabutin concentrations one-half day after the last dose of rifabutin were 60 ng/mL when co-administered with azithromycin and 71 ng/mL when co-administered with placebo.
* - 90% confidence interval not reported
| Co-administered Drug | Dose of Co-administered Drug | Dose of Azithromycin | n | Ratio (with/without co-administered Pharmacokinetic Parameters | drug) of Azithromycin (90% CI); No Effect = 1.00 |
| Mean Cmax | Mean AUC | ||||
| Efavirenz | 400 mg/day x 7 days | 600 mg PO on day 7 | 14 | 1.22 (1.04 to 1.42) | 0.92* |
| Fluconazole | 200 mg PO single dose | 1,200 mg PO single dose | 18 | 0.82 (0.66 to 1.02) | 1.07 (0.94 to 1.22) |
| Nelfinavir | 750 mg TID x 11 days | 1,200 mg PO on day 9 | 14 | 2.36 (1.77 to 3.15) | 2.12 (1.80 to 2.50) |
| Rifabutin | 300 mg/day x 10 days | 500 mg PO on day 1, then 250 mg/day on days 2-10 | 6 | See footnote below | NA |
Mean azithromycin concentrations one day after the last dose were 53 ng/mL when coadministered with 300 mg daily rifabutin and 49 ng/mL when coadministered with placebo.
* -90% Confidence interval not reported
Microbiology
Azithromycin acts by binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit of susceptible microorganisms and, thus, interfering with microbial protein synthesis. Nucleic acid synthesis is not affected.
Azithromycin concentrates in phagocytes and fibroblasts as demonstrated by in vitro incubation techniques. Using such methodology, the ratio of intracellular to extracellular concentration was greater than 30 after one hour incubation. In vivo studies suggest that concentration in phagocytes may contribute to drug distribution to inflamed tissues.
Azithromycin has been shown to be active against most isolates of the following microorganisms, both in vitro and in clinical infections as described in the INDICATIONS AND USAGE section.
Aerobic and facultative gram-positive microorganisms
Staphylococcus aureus
Streptococcus agalactiae
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Streptococcus pyogenes
NOTE: Azithromycin demonstrates cross-resistance with erythromycin-resistant gram-positive strains. Most strains of Enterococcus faecalis and methicillin-resistant staphylococci are resistant to azithromycin.
Aerobic and facultative gram-negative microorganisms
Haemophilus ducreyi
Haemophilus influenzae
Moraxella catarrhalis
Neisseria
gonorrhoeae
"Other" microorganisms
Chlamydia pneumoniae
Chlamydia
trachomatis
Mycoplasma pneumoniae
Beta-lactamase production should have no effect on azithromycin activity.
The following in vitro data are available, but their clinical significance is unknown.
At least 90% of the following microorganisms exhibit an in vitro minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) less than or equal to the susceptible breakpoints for azithromycin. However, the safety and effectiveness of azithromycin in treating clinical infections due to these microorganisms have not been established in adequate and well-controlled trials.
Aerobic and facultative gram-positive microorganisms
Streptococci (Groups C, F, G)
Viridans group streptococci
Aerobic and facultative gram-negative microorganisms
Bordetella pertussis
Legionella pneumophila
Anaerobic microorganisms
Peptostreptococcus species
Prevotella bivia
"Other" microorganisms
Ureaplasma urealyticum
When available, the results of in vitro susceptibility test results for antimicrobial drugs used in resident hospitals should be provided to the physician as periodic reports which describe the susceptibility profile of nosocomial and community-acquired pathogens. These reports may differ from susceptibility data obtained from outpatient use, but could aid the physician in selecting the most effective antimicrobial.
Dilution techniquesQuantitative methods are used to determine antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). These MICs provide estimates of the susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. The MICs should be determined using a standardized procedure. Standardized procedures are based on a dilution method1,3 (broth or agar) or equivalent with standardized inoculum concentrations and standardized concentrations of azithromycin powder. The MIC values should be interpreted according to criteria provided in Table 1.
Diffusion techniquesQuantitative methods that require measurement of zone diameters also provide reproducible estimates of the susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. One such standardized procedure2,3 requires the use of standardized inoculum concentrations. This procedure uses paper disks impregnated with 15-µg azithromycin to test the susceptibility of microorganisms to azithromycin. The disk diffusion interpretive criteria are provided in Table 1.
| Susceptibility | Test Result | Interpretive Criteria | ||||
| Minimum | Inhibitory (µg/mL) | Concentrations | Disk Diffusion | (zone in mm) | diameters | |
| Pathogen | ||||||
| S | I | R* | S | I | R* | |
| Haemophilus spp. | less than or equal to 4 | -- | -- | greater than or equal to 12 | -- | -- |
| Staphylococcus aureus | less than or equal to 2 | 4 | greater than or equal to 8 | greater than or equal to 18 | 14-17 | less than or equal to 13 |
| Streptococci including S. pneumoniae† | less than or equal to 0.5 | 1 | greater than or equal to 2 | greater than or equal to 18 | 14-17 | less than or equal to 13 |
* The current absence of data on resistant strains precludes defining any category other than "susceptible." If strains yield MIC results other than susceptible, they should be submitted to a reference laboratory for further testing.
† Susceptibility of streptococci including S. pneumoniae to azithromycin and other macrolides can be predicted by testing erythromycin.
No interpretive criteria have been established for testing Neisseria gonorrhoeae. This species is not usually tested.
A report of "susceptible" indicates that the pathogen is likely to be inhibited if the antimicrobial compound reaches the concentrations usually achievable. A report of "intermediate" indicates that the result should be considered equivocal, and, if the microorganism is not fully susceptible to alternative, clinically feasible drugs, the test should be repeated. This category implies possible clinical applicability in body sites where the drug is physiologically concentrated or in situations where high dosage of drug can be used. This category also provides a buffer zone which prevents small uncontrolled technical factors from causing major discrepancies in interpretation. A report of "resistant" indicates that the pathogen is not likely to be inhibited if the antimicrobial compound reaches the concentrations usually achievable; other therapy should be selected.
QUALITY CONTROLStandardized susceptibility test procedures require the use of quality control microorganisms to control the technical aspects of the test procedures. Standard azithromycin powder should provide the following range of values noted in Table 2. Quality control microorganisms are specific strains of organisms with intrinsic biological properties. QC strains are very stable strains which will give a standard and repeatable susceptibility pattern. The specific strains used for microbiological quality control are not clinically significant.
| QC Strain | Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (µg/mL) | Disk Diffusion (zone diameters in mm) |
|---|---|---|
| Haemophilus influenzae ATCC 49247 | 1.0–4.0 | 13–21 |
| Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 | 0.5–2.0 | |
| Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 | 21–26 | |
| Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 | 0.06–0.25 | 19–25 |