Effects on vasomotor symptoms
A 13-week double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was
conducted to evaluate the efficacy of 2 doses of the vaginal ring in the
treatment of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in 333 postmenopausal women
between 29 and 85 years of age (mean age 51.7 years, 77% were Caucasian) who had
at least 7 moderate to severe hot flushes daily or at least 56 moderate to
severe hot flushes per week before randomization. Patients were randomized to
receive either placebo, Femring 0.05 mg/day or Femring 0.10 mg/day. Femring 0.05
mg/day and Femring 0.10 mg/day were shown to be statistically better than
placebo at weeks 4 and 12 for relief of both the frequency and severity of
moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms. Frequency results are shown in Table 2. Severity results are shown in Table
3.
Table 2. Mean Change from Baseline in the Number of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms per Week – ITT Population, LOCFVisit
| Placebo (n = 105)
| Estradiol 0.05 mg/day (n = 111) | Estradiol 0.10 mg/day (n = 109)
|
Baseline*
|
|
|
|
Mean (SD)
| 83.62 (60.42)
| 73.83 (24.53)
| 75.11 (25.44)
|
Week 4
|
|
|
|
Mean (SD)
| 51.14 (51.19)
| 21.59† (27.76) | 11.37† (19.43) |
Mean Change from Baseline (SD)
| -32.48 (46.25)
| -52.24† (32.92) | -63.75† (26.68) |
| p value vs. Placebo (95% CI)‡ | -
| less than 0.001 (-30.7, -8.8) | less than 0.001 (-42.2, -20.3) |
Week 12
|
|
|
|
Mean (SD)
| 42.21 (41.13)
| 15.48† (25.42) | 8.25† (16.58) |
Mean Change from Baseline (SD)
| -41.41 (65.61)
| -58.36† (31.36) | -66.87† (27.44) |
| p value vs. Placebo (95% CI)‡ | -
| 0.006 (-30.5, -3.4)
| less than 0.001 (-39.1, -11.8)
|
ITT = intent to treat; LOCF = last observation carried forward; CI = confidence interval
* The baseline number of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (MSVS) is the weekly
average number of MSVS during the two weeks between screening and randomization.
† Denotes statistical significance at the 0.050 level.
‡ p values and confidence intervals are from a two-way ANOVA with factors for treatment
and
study center for the difference between treatment groups in the mean change from
baseline.
Confidence intervals are adjusted for multiple comparisons within each
timepoint using Dunnett’s
method
Table 3. Mean Change from Baseline in the Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms per Week – ITT Population, LOCFVisit
| Placebo (n = 105)
| Estradiol 0.05 mg/day (n = 111)
| Estradiol 0.10 mg/day (n = 109)
|
Baseline*
|
|
|
|
Mean (SD)
| 2.51 (0.26)
| 2.46 (0.23)
| 2.48 (0.24)
|
Week 4
|
|
|
|
Mean (SD)
| 2.23 (0.71)
| 1.67† (1.07) | 1.15† (1.14) |
Mean Change from Baseline (SD)
| -0.28 (0.69)
| - 0.79† (1.08) | -1.33† (1.10) |
| p value vs. Placebo (95% CI)‡ | -
| less than 0.001 (-0.8, -0.2) | less than 0.001 (-1.3, -0.8) |
Week 12
|
|
|
|
Mean (SD)
| 2.00 (0.96)
| 1.41† (1.17) | 0.92† (1.09) |
Mean Change from Baseline (SD)
| -0.51 (0.94)
| -1.06† (1.16) | -1.56† (1.06) |
| p value vs. Placebo (95% CI)‡ | -
| less than 0.001 (-0.9, -0.2) | less than 0.001 (-1.4, -0.7) |
ITT = intent to treat; LOCF = last observation carried forward; CI = confidence interval
* The baseline severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (MSVS) is the
average
severity of MSVS during the two weeks between screening and
randomization.
† Denotes statistical significance at the 0.050 level.
‡ p values and confidence intervals are from a two-way ANOVA with factors for
treatment
and study center for the difference between treatment groups in the
mean change from
baseline. Confidence intervals are adjusted for multiple
comparisons within each timepoint
using Dunnett’s method.
Effects on vulvar and vaginal atrophy
In the same 13-week clinical trial, vaginal superficial cells
increased by a mean of 16.0% and 18.9% for Femring 0.05 mg/day and Femring 0.10
mg/day, respectively, as compared to 1.11% for placebo at week 13. A
corresponding reduction in parabasal cells was observed at week 13. Vaginal pH
decreased for Femring 0.05 mg/day and Femring 0.10 mg/day by a mean of 0.73 and
0.60, respectively, compared to a mean decrease of 0.25 in the placebo
group.
Women’s Health Initiative Studies
The Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) enrolled approximately 27,000
predominantly healthy postmenopausal women in two substudies to assess the risks
and benefits of daily oral CE (0.625 mg)-alone or in combination with MPA (2.5
mg) compared to placebo in the prevention of certain chronic diseases. The
primary endpoint was the incidence of coronary heart disease [(CHD) defined as
nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), silent MI and CHD death], with invasive
breast cancer as the primary adverse outcome. A “global index” included the
earliest occurrence of CHD, invasive breast cancer, stroke, pulmonary embolism
(PE), endometrial cancer (only in the CE plus MPA substudy), colorectal cancer,
hip fracture or death due to other cause. The study did not evaluate the effects
of CE or CE plus MPA on menopausal symptoms.
WHI Estrogen-Alone Substudy
The WHI estrogen-alone substudy was stopped early because an increased risk
of stroke was observed, and it was deemed that no further information would be
obtained regarding the risks and benefits of estrogen-alone in predetermined
primary endpoints. Results of the estrogen-alone substudy, which included 10,739
women (average age of 63 years, range 50 to 79; 75.3 percent White, 15.1 percent
Black, 6.1 percent Hispanic, 3.6 percent Other), after an average follow-up of
7.1 years, are presented in Table 4.
TABLE 4. Relative and Absolute Risk Seen in the Estrogen-Alone Substudy of WHI
Event
| Relative Risk CE vs Placebo (95% nCI*)
| CE n = 5,310 Absolute Risk Women -
| Placebo n = 5,429 per 10,000 Years
|
| CHD events† | 0.95 (0.78 - 1.16)
| 54
| 57
|
| Non-fatal MI† | 0.91 (0.73 - 1.14) | 40
| 43
|
| CHD death† | 1.01 (0.71 - 1.43)
| 16
| 16
|
| All Stroke† | 1.33 (1.05 - 1.68)
| 45
| 33
|
| Ischemic† | 1.55 (1.19 - 2.01)
| 38
| 25
|
| Deep vein thrombosis†,‡ | 1.47 (1.06 - 2.06) | 23
| 15
|
| Pulmonary embolism† | 1.37 (0.90 - 2.07)
| 14
| 10
|
| Invasive breast cancer† | 0.80 (0.62 - 1.04)
| 28
| 34
|
| Colorectal cancer§ | 1.08 (0.75 - 1.55)
| 17
| 16
|
| Hip fracture† | 0.65 (0.45 - 0.94)
| 12
| 19
|
| Vertebral fractures†,‡ | 0.64 (0.44 - 0.93)
| 11
| 18
|
| Lower arm/wrist fractures†,‡ | 0.58 (0.47 - 0.72)
| 35
| 59
|
| Total fractures†,‡ | 0.71 (0.64 - 0.80)
| 144
| 197
|
| Death due to other causes§,¶ | 1.08 (0.88 - 1.32)
| 53
| 50
|
| Overall mortality†,‡ | 1.04 (0.88 - 1.22)
| 79
| 75
|
| Global Index# | 1.02 (0.92 - 1.13)
| 206
| 201
|
* Nominal confidence intervals unadjusted for multiple looks and multiple
comparisons.
† Results are based on centrally adjudicated data for an average follow-up of 7.1
years.
‡ Not included in Global index.
§ Results are based on an average follow-up of 6.8 years.
¶ All deaths, except from breast or colorectal cancer, definite/probable CHD,
PE or cerebrovascular disease.
# A subset of the events was combined in a “global index”, defined as the
earliest occurrence of CHD
events, invasive breast cancer, stroke, pulmonary
embolism, colorectal cancer, hip fracture, or death due
to other causes.
For those outcomes included in the WHI “global index” that reached statistical
significance, the absolute excess risk per 10,000 women-years in the group
treated with CE-alone were 12 more strokes, while the absolute risk reduction
per 10,000 women-years was 7 fewer hip fractures. The absolute excess risk of
events included in the “global index” was a nonsignificant 5 events per 10,000
women-years. There was no difference between the groups in terms of all-cause
mortality. (See BOXED WARNINGS, WARNINGS,
and PRECAUTIONS.)
No overall difference for primary CHD events (nonfatal MI, silent MI and CHD
death) and invasive breast cancer incidence in women receiving CE-alone compared
with placebo was reported in final centrally adjudicated results from the
estrogen-alone substudy, after an average follow-up of 7.1 years (see Table
4).
Centrally adjudicated results for stroke events from the estrogen-alone
substudy, after an average follow-up of 7.1 years, reported no significant
difference in distribution of stroke subtype or severity, including fatal
strokes, in women receiving CE-alone compared to placebo. Estrogen-alone
increased the risk of ischemic stroke, and this excess was present in all
subgroups of women examined (see Table 4).
Timing of the initiation of estrogen therapy relative to the start of
menopause may affect the overall risk benefit profile. The WHI estrogen-alone
substudy stratified by age showed in women 50-59 years of age, a non-significant
trend toward reduced risk for CHD [HR 0.63 (95 percent CI
0.36-1.09) and overall mortality [HR 0.71 (95 percent
CI 0.46-1.11)].
WHI Estrogen Plus Progestin Substudy
The WHI estrogen plus progestin substudy was also stopped early. According to
the predefined stopping rule, after an average follow-up of 5.6 years of
treatment, the increased risk of breast cancer and cardiovascular events
exceeded the specified benefits included in the “global index”. The absolute
excess risk of events included in the “global index” was 19 per 10,000
women-years.
For those outcomes included in the WHI “global index” that reached
statistical significance after 5.6 years of follow-up, the absolute excess risks
per 10,000 women-years in the group treated with CE plus MPA were 7 more CHD
events, 8 more strokes, 10 more PEs, and 8 more invasive breast cancers, while
the absolute risk reductions per 10,000 women-years were 6 fewer colorectal
cancers and 5 fewer hip fractures.
Results of the estrogen plus progestin substudy, which included 16,608 women
(average 63 years of age, range 50 to 79; 83.9 percent White, 6.8 percent Black,
5.4 percent Hispanic, 3.9 percent Other) are presented in Table 5. These results
reflect centrally adjudicated data after an average follow-up of 5.6 years.
TABLE 5. Relative and Absolute Risk Seen in the Estrogen Plus Progestin Substudy of WHI at an Average of 5.6 Years*
Event
| Relative Risk CE/MPA vs Placebo (95% nCI†)
| CE/MPA n = 8,506 Absolute Risk Women -
| Placebo n = 8,102 per 10,000 Years
|
CHD events
| 1.23 (0.99 - 1.53)
| 41
| 34
|
| Non-fatal MI† | 1.28 (1.00 - 1.63) | 31
| 25
|
| CHD death | 1.10 (0.70 - 1.75) | 8
| 8
|
All strokes
| 1.31 (1.03 - 1.68)
| 33
| 25
|
| Ischemic Stroke | 1.44 (1.09 - 1.90)
| 26
| 18
|
| Deep vein thrombosis‡ | 1.95 (1.43 - 2.67)
| 26
| 13
|
| Pulmonary embolism | 2.13 (1.45 - 3.11)
| 18
| 8
|
| Invasive breast cancer§ | 1.24 (1.01 - 1.54)
| 41
| 33
|
| Colorectal cancer | 0.61 (0.42 - 0.87)
| 10
| 16
|
| Endometrial cancer‡ | 0.81 (0.48 - 1.36)
| 6
| 7
|
| Cervical cancer‡ | 1.44 (0.47 - 4.42)
| 2
| 1
|
| Hip fracture† | 0.67 (0.47 - 0.96)
| 11
| 16
|
| Vertebral fractures‡ | 0.65 (0.46 - 0.92)
| 11
| 17
|
| Lower arm/wrist fractures‡ | 0.71 (0.59 - 0.85)
| 44
| 62
|
| Total fractures‡ | 0.76 (0.69 - 0.83)
| 152
| 199
|
| Overall Mortality‡,¶ | 1.00 (0.83 - 1.19)
| 52
| 52
|
| Global Index# | 1.13 (1.02 - 1.25)
| 184
| 165
|
* Results are based on centrally adjudicated data.
† Nominal confidence intervals unadjusted for multiple looks and multiple
comparisons.
‡ Not included in Global index.
§ Includes metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancer, with the exception of in
situ breast cancer.
¶ All deaths, except from breast or colorectal cancer, definite/probable CHD, PE
or cerebrovascular disease.
# A subset of the events was combined in a “global index” defined as the
earliest occurrence of CHD events,
invasive breast cancer, stroke, pulmonary
embolism, colorectal cancer, hip fracture, or death due to other causes.
Timing of the initiation of estrogen therapy relative to the start of
menopause may affect the overall risk benefit profile. The WHI estrogen plus
progestin substudy stratified by age showed in women 50-59 years of age, a
non-significant trend toward reduced risk for overall mortality [HR 0.69 (95 percent CI 0.44-1.07)].
Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study
The estrogen-alone Women's Health Initiative Memory Study
(WHIMS), an ancillary study of WHI, enrolled 2,947 predominantly healthy
hysterectomized postmenopausal women 65 years to 79 years of age and older (45
percent, age 65 to 69 years; 36 percent, 70 to 74 years; 19 percent, 75 years of
age and older) to evaluate the effects of daily CE (0.625 mg) on the incidence
of probable dementia (primary outcome) compared to placebo.
After an average follow-up of 5.2 years, the relative risk of probable
dementia for CE-alone versus placebo was 1.49 (95 percent CI 0.83–2.66). The
absolute risk of probable dementia for CE-alone versus placebo was 37 versus 25
cases per 10,000 women-years. Probable dementia as defined in this study
included Alzheimer’s disease (AD), vascular dementia (VaD) and
mixed types (having features of both AD and VaD). The most common
classification of probable dementia in the treatment group and the placebo group
was AD. Since the ancillary study was conducted in women 65 to 79 years of age,
it is unknown whether these findings apply to younger postmenopausal women. (See
BOXED
WARNINGS, WARNINGS, Dementia
and PRECAUTIONS,
Geriatric
Use.)
The WHIMS estrogen plus progestin ancillary study enrolled 4,532
predominantly healthy postmenopausal women 65 years of age and older (47 percent
were age 65 to 69 years of age; 35 percent were 70 to 74 years of age; and 18
percent 75 years of age and older) to evaluate the effects of daily CE (0.625
mg) plus MPA (2.5 mg) on the incidence of probable dementia (primary outcome)
compared to placebo.
After an average follow-up of 4 years, the relative risk of probable dementia
for CE (0.625 mg) plus MPA (2.5 mg) versus placebo was 2.05 (95 percent CI, 1.21 to 3.48). The absolute risk of probable
dementia for CE (0.625 mg) plus MPA (2.5 mg) versus placebo was 45 versus 22 per
10,000 women-years. Probable dementia as defined in this study included
Alzheimer’s disease (AD), vascular dementia (VaD) and mixed types (having
features of both AD and VaD). The most common classification of probable
dementia in the treatment group and placebo group was AD. Since the ancillary
study was conducted in women 65 to 79 years of age, it is unknown whether these
findings apply to younger postmenopausal women. (See BOXED WARNINGS, WARNINGS, Dementia
and PRECAUTIONS,
Geriatric
Use.)
When data from the two populations were pooled as planned in the WHIMS
protocol, the reported overall relative risk for probable dementia was 1.76
(95 percent CI 1.19-2.60). Differences between groups
became apparent in the first year of treatment. It is unknown whether these
findings apply to younger postmenopausal women. (See BOXED WARNINGS, WARNINGS, Dementia
and PRECAUTIONS,
Geriatric
Use.)