Duodenal UlcerIn a U.S. multicenter, double-blind study in outpatients with endoscopically confirmed duodenal ulcer, orally administered famotidine was compared to placebo. As shown in Table 1, 70% of patients treated with famotidine 40 mg h.s. were healed by week 4.
Table 1: Outpatients with Endoscopically Confirmed Healed Duodenal Ulcers
| | Famotidine 40 mg h.s (N = 89) | Famotidine 20 mg b.i.d. (N = 84) | Placebo h.s. (N = 97) |
| Week 2 | *32% | *38% | 17% |
| Week 4 | *70% | *67% | 31% |
* Statistically significantly different than placebo (p < 0.001)
Patients not healed by week 4 were continued in the study. By week 8, 83% of patients treated with famotidine had healed versus 45% of patients treated with placebo. The incidence of ulcer healing with famotidine was significantly higher than with placebo at each time point based on proportion of endoscopically confirmed healed ulcers.
In this study, time to relief of daytime and nocturnal pain was significantly shorter for patients receiving famotidine than for patients receiving placebo; patients receiving famotidine also took less antacid than the patients receiving placebo.
Long-Term Maintenance
Treatment of Duodenal Ulcers
Famotidine, 20 mg p.o. h.s. was compared to placebo h.s. as maintenance therapy in two double-blind, multicenter studies of patients with endoscopically confirmed healed duodenal ulcers. In the U.S. study the observed ulcer incidence within 12 months in patients treated with placebo was 2.4 times greater than in the patients treated with famotidine. The 89 patients treated with famotidine had a cumulative observed ulcer incidence of 23.4% compared to an observed ulcer incidence of 56.6% in the 89 patients receiving placebo (p < 0.01). These results were confirmed in an international study where the cumulative observed ulcer incidence within 12 months in the 307 patients treated with famotidine was 35.7%, compared to an incidence of 75.5% in the 325 patients treated with placebo (p < 0.01).
Gastric Ulcer
In both a U.S. and an international multicenter, double-blind study in patients with endoscopically confirmed active benign gastric ulcer, orally administered famotidine, 40 mg h.s., was compared to placebo h.s. Antacids were permitted during the studies, but consumption was not significantly different between the famotidine and placebo groups. As shown in Table 2, the incidence of ulcer healing (dropouts counted as unhealed) with famotidine was statistically significantly better than placebo at weeks 6 and 8 in the U.S. study, and at weeks 4, 6 and 8 in the international study, based on the number of ulcers that healed, confirmed by endoscopy.
Table 2: Patients with Endoscopically Confirmed Healed Gastric Ulcers
| | U.S. Study | International Study |
| | Famotidine 40 mg h.s. (N = 74) | Placebo h.s. (N = 75) | Famotidine 40 mg h.s. (N= 149) | Placebo h.s. (N = 145) |
| Week 4 | 45% | 39% | *47% | 31% |
| Week 6 | *66% | 44% | *65% | 46% |
| Week 8 | †78% | 64% | *80% | 54% |
* Statistically significantly better than placebo (p ≤0.01)
† Statistically significantly better than placebo (p ≤ 0.05)
Time to complete relief of daytime and nighttime pain was statistically significantly shorter for patients receiving famotidine than for patients receiving placebo; however, in neither study was there a statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients whose pain was relieved by the end of the study (week 8).
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
Orally administered famotidine was compared to placebo in a U.S. study that enrolled patients with symptoms of GERD and without endoscopic evidence of erosion or ulceration of the esophagus. Famotidine 20 mg b.i.d. was statistically significantly superior to 40 mg h.s. and to placebo in providing a successful symptomatic outcome, defined as moderate or excellent improvement of symptoms (Table 3).
Table 3: % Successful Symptomatic Outcome
| | Famotidine 20 mg b.i.d. (N = 154) | Famotidine 40 mg h.s. (N = 149) | Placebo (N = 73) |
| Week 6 | 82* | 69 | 62 |
* p ≤0.01 vs Placebo
By two weeks of treatment symptomatic success was observed in a greater percentage of patients taking famotidine 20 mg b.i.d. compared to placebo (p ≤ 0.01).
Symptomatic improvement and healing of endoscopically verified erosion and ulceration were studied in two additional trials. Healing was defined as complete resolution of all erosions or ulcerations visible with endoscopy. The U.S. study comparing famotidine 40 mg p.o. b.i.d. to placebo and famotidine 20 mg p.o. b.i.d. showed a significantly greater percentage of healing for famotidine 40 mg b.i.d. at weeks 6 and 12 (Table 4).
Table 4: % Endoscopic Healing - U.S. Study
| | Famotidine 40 mg b.i.d. (N = 127) | Famotidine 20 mg b.i.d (N = 125) | Placebo (N = 66) |
| Week 6 | 48 *,† | 32 | 18 |
| Week 12 | 69*,‡ | 54* | 29 |
* p ≤ 0.01 vs Placebo
† p ≤ 0.01 vs famotidine 20 mg b.i.d.
‡ p ≤ 0.05 vs famotidine 20 mg b.i.d.
As compared to placebo, patients who received famotidine had faster relief of daytime and nighttime heartburn and a greater percentage of patients experienced complete relief of nighttime heartburn. These differences were statistically significant.
In the international study, when famotidine 40 mg p.o. b.i.d., was compared to ranitidine 150 mg p.o. b.i.d., a statistically significantly greater percentage of healing was observed with famotidine 40 mg b.i.d. at week 12 (Table 5). There was, however, no significant difference among treatments in symptom relief.
Table 5: % Endoscopic Healing - International Study
| | Famotidine 40 mg b.i.d. (N = 175) | Famotidine 20 mg b.i.d (N = 93) | Ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d (N = 172) |
| Week 6 | 48 | 52 | 42 |
| Week 12 | 71* | 68 | 60 |
* p ≤ 0.05 vs Ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d.
Pathological Hypersecretory Conditions (e.g., Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome, Multiple Endocrine Adenomas)
In studies of patients with pathological hypersecretory conditions such as Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome with or without multiple endocrine adenomas, famotidine significantly inhibited gastric acid secretion and controlled associated symptoms. Orally administered doses from 20 to 160 mg q 6 h maintained basal acid secretion below 10 mEq/hr; initial doses were titrated to the individual patient need and subsequent adjustments were necessary with time in some patients. Famotidine was well tolerated at these high dose levels for prolonged periods (greater than 12 months) in eight patients, and there were no cases reported of gynecomastia, increased prolactin levels, or impotence which were considered to be due to the drug.