General
The neuromuscular blocking activity of cisatracurium is due to parent drug. Cisatracurium plasma concentration-time data following intravenous bolus administration are best described by a two-compartment open model (with elimination from both compartments) with an elimination half-life (t1/2β) of 22 minutes, a plasma clearance (CL) of 4.57 mL/min/kg, and a volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) of 145 mL/kg. Cisatracurium undergoes organ-independent Hofmann elimination (a chemical process dependent on pH and temperature) to form the monoquaternary acrylate metabolite and laudanosine, neither of which has any neuromuscular blocking activity (see Pharmacokinetics, Metabolism). Following administration of radiolabeled cisatracurium, 95% of the dose was recovered in the urine; less than 10% of the dose was excreted as unchanged parent drug. Laudanosine, a metabolite of cisatracurium (and atracurium) has been noted to cause transient hypotension and, in higher doses, cerebral excitatory effects when administered to several animal species. The relationship between CNS excitation and laudanosine concentrations in humans has not been established (see PRECAUTIONS, Long-Term Use in the Intensive Care Unit [ICU]). Because cisatracurium is three times more potent than atracurium and lower doses are required, the corresponding laudanosine concentrations following cisatracurium are one third of those that would be expected following an equipotent dose of atracurium (see Pharmacokinetics, Special Populations, Intensive Care Unit Patients).
Results from population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analyses from 241 healthy surgical patients are summarized in Table 5.
Table 5. Key Population PK/PD Parameter Estimates for Cisatracurium in Healthy Surgical Patients* Following 0.1 (2 x ED95) to 0.4 mg/kg (8 x ED95) Cisatracurium
Parameter
| Estimate†
| Magnitude of Interpatient Variability (CV)‡
|
CL (mL/min/kg)
| 4.57
| 16%
|
Vss (mL/kg)§
| 145
| 27%
|
keo (min-1)ll
| 0.0575
| 61%
|
EC50 (ng/mL)¶
| 141
| 52%
|
*Healthy male non-obese patients 19 to 64 years of age with creatinine clearance values greater than 70 mL/min who received cisatracurium during opioid anesthesia and had venous samples collected.
† The percent standard error of the mean (%SEM) ranged from 3% to 12% indicating good precision for the PK/PD estimates.
‡ Expressed as a coefficient of variation; the %SEM ranged from 20% to 35% indicating adequate precision for the estimates of interpatient variability.
§ Vss is the volume of distribution at steady state estimated using a two-compartment model with elimination from both compartments. Vss is equal to the sum of the volume in the central compartment (Vc) and the volume in the peripheral compartment (Vp); interpatient variability could only be estimated for Vc.
ll Rate constant describing the equilibration between plasma concentrations and neuromuscular block.
¶ Concentration required to produce 50% T1 suppression; an index of patient sensitivity.
The magnitude of interpatient variability in CL was low (16%), as expected based on the importance of Hofmann elimination (see Pharmacokinetics, Elimination). The magnitudes of interpatient variability in CL and volume of distribution were low in comparison to those for keo and EC50. This suggests that any alterations in the time course of cisatracurium-induced block are more likely to be due to variability in the pharmacodynamic parameters than in the pharmacokinetic parameters. Parameter estimates from the population pharmacokinetic analyses were supported by noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analyses on data from healthy patients and from special patient populations.
Conventional pharmacokinetic analyses have shown that the pharmacokinetics of cisatracurium are proportional to dose between 0.1 (2 x ED95) and 0.2 (4 x ED95) mg/kg cisatracurium. In addition, population pharmacokinetic analyses revealed no statistically significant effect of initial dose on CL for doses between 0.1 (2 x ED95) and 0.4 (8 x ED95) mg/kg cisatracurium.
Distribution
The volume of distribution of cisatracurium is limited by its large molecular weight and high polarity. The Vss was equal to 145 mL/kg (Table 4) in healthy 19- to 64-year-old surgical patients receiving opioid anesthesia. The Vss was 21% larger in similar patients receiving inhalation anesthesia (see Pharmacokinetics, Special Populations, Other Patient Factors).
Protein Binding
The binding of cisatracurium to plasma proteins has not been successfully studied due to its rapid degradation at physiologic pH. Inhibition of degradation requires nonphysiological conditions of temperature and pH which are associated with changes in protein binding.
Metabolism
The degradation of cisatracurium is largely independent of liver metabolism. Results from in vitro experiments suggest that cisatracurium undergoes Hofmann elimination (a pH and temperature-dependent chemical process) to form laudanosine (see PRECAUTIONS, Long-Term Use in the Intensive Care Unit [ICU]) and the monoquaternary acrylate metabolite. The monoquaternary acrylate undergoes hydrolysis by non-specific plasma esterases to form the monoquaternary alcohol (MQA) metabolite. The MQA metabolite can also undergo Hofmann elimination but at a much slower rate than cisatracurium. Laudanosine is further metabolized to desmethyl metabolites which are conjugated with glucuronic acid and excreted in the urine.
Organ-independent Hofmann elimination is the predominant pathway for the elimination of cisatracurium. The liver and kidney play a minor role in the elimination of cisatracurium but are primary pathways for the elimination of metabolites. Therefore, the t1/2ß values of metabolites (including laudanosine) are longer in patients with kidney or liver dysfunction and metabolite concentrations may be higher after long-term administration (see PRECAUTIONS, Long-Term Use in the Intensive Care Unit [ICU]). Most importantly, Cmax values of laudanosine are significantly lower in healthy surgical patients receiving infusions of cisatracurium than in patients receiving infusions of atracurium (mean ± SD Cmax: 60 ± 52 and 342 ± 93 ng/mL, respectively).
Elimination
Clearance and Half-life
Mean CL values for cisatracurium ranged from 4.5 to 5.7 mL/min/kg in studies of healthy surgical patients. Compartmental pharmacokinetic modeling suggests that approximately 80% of the CL is accounted for by Hofmann elimination and the remaining 20% by renal and hepatic elimination. These findings are consistent with the low magnitude of interpatient variability in CL (16%) estimated as part of the population PK/PD analyses and with the recovery of parent and metabolites in urine. Following 14C-cisatracurium administration to 6 healthy male patients, 95% of the dose was recovered in the urine (mostly as conjugated metabolites) and 4% in the feces; less than 10% of the dose was excreted as unchanged parent drug in the urine. In 12 healthy surgical patients receiving non-radiolabeled cisatracurium who had Foley catheters placed for surgical management, approximately 15% of the dose was excreted unchanged in the urine.
In studies of healthy surgical patients, mean t1/2β values of cisatracurium ranged from 22 to 29 minutes and were consistent with the t1/2β of cisatracurium in vitro (29 minutes). The mean ± SD t1/2β values of laudanosine were 3.1 ± 0.4 and 3.3 ± 2.1 hours in healthy surgical patients receiving cisatracurium (n = 10) or atracurium (n = 10), respectively. During IV infusions of cisatracurium, peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) of laudanosine and the MQA metabolite are approximately 6% and 11% of the parent compound, respectively.
Special Populations
Geriatric Patients (≥ 65 years)
The results of conventional pharmacokinetic analysis from a study of 12 healthy elderly patients and 12 healthy young adult patients receiving a single intravenous dose of 0.1 mg/kg cisatracurium are summarized in Table 6. Plasma clearances of cisatracurium were not affected by age; however, the volumes of distribution were slightly larger in elderly patients than in young patients resulting in slightly longer t1/2β values for cisatracurium. The rate of equilibration between plasma cisatracurium concentrations and neuromuscular block was slower in elderly patients than in young patients (mean ± SD keo: 0.071 ± 0.036 and 0.105 ± 0.021 minutes-1, respectively); there was no difference in the patient sensitivity to cisatracurium-induced block, as indicated by EC50 values (mean ± SD EC50: 91 ± 22 and 89 ± 23 ng/mL, respectively). These changes were consistent with the 1-minute slower times to maximum block in elderly patients receiving 0.1 mg/kg cisatracurium, when compared to young patients receiving the same dose. The minor differences in PK/PD parameters of cisatracurium between elderly patients and young patients were not associated with clinically significant differences in the recovery profile of cisatracurium.
Table 6. Pharmacokinetic Parameters* of Cisatracurium in Healthy Elderly and Young Adult Patients Following 0.1 mg/kg (2 x ED95) Cisatracurium (Isoflurane/Nitrous Oxide/Oxygen Anesthesia)
Parameter
| Healthy Elderly Patients
| Healthy Young Adult Patients
|
Elimination Half-Life (t½β, min)
| 25.8 ± 3.6†
| 22.1 ± 2.5
|
Volume of Distribution at Steady State‡ (mL/kg)
| 156 ± 17†
| 133 ± 15
|
Plasma Clearance (mL/min/kg)
| 5.7 ± 1
| 5.3 ± 0.9
|
* Values presented are mean ± SD.
†P < 0.05 for comparisons between healthy elderly and healthy young adult patients.
‡ Volume of distribution is underestimated because elimination from the peripheral compartment is ignored.
Patients with Hepatic Disease
Table 7 summarizes the conventional pharmacokinetic analysis from a study of cisatracurium in 13 patients with end-stage liver disease undergoing liver transplantation and 11 healthy adult patients undergoing elective surgery. The slightly larger volumes of distribution in liver transplant patients were associated with slightly higher plasma clearances of cisatracurium. The parallel changes in these parameters resulted in no difference in t½β values. There were no differences in keo or EC50 between patient groups. The times to maximum block were approximately one minute faster in liver transplant patients than in healthy adult patients receiving 0.1 mg/kg cisatracurium. These minor differences in pharmacokinetics were not associated with clinically significant differences in the recovery profile of cisatracurium.
The t½β values of metabolites are longer in patients with hepatic disease and concentrations may be higher after long-term administration (see Pharmacokinetics, Special Populations, Intensive Care Unit Patients).
Table 7. Pharmacokinetic Parameters* of Cisatracurium in Healthy Adult Patients and in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation Following 0.1 mg/kg (2 x ED95) Cisatracurium (Isoflurane/Nitrous Oxide/Oxygen Anesthesia)
Parameter
| Liver Transplant Patients
| Healthy Adult Patients
|
Elimination Half-Life (t½β, min)
| 24.4 ± 2.9
| 23.5 ± 3.5
|
Volume of Distribution at Steady State‡ (mL/kg)
| 195 ± 38†
| 161 ± 23
|
Plasma Clearance (mL/min/kg)
| 6.6 ± 1.1†
| 5.7 ± 0.8
|
* Values presented are mean ± SD.
†P < 0.05 for comparisons between liver transplant patients and healthy adult patients.
‡Volume of distribution is underestimated because elimination from the peripheral compartment is ignored.
Patients with Renal Dysfunction
Results from a conventional pharmacokinetic study of cisatracurium in 13 healthy adult patients and 15 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing elective surgery are summarized in Table 8. The PK/PD parameters of cisatracurium were similar in healthy adult patients and ESRD patients. The times to 90% block were approximately one minute slower in ESRD patients following 0.1 mg/kg cisatracurium. There were no differences in the durations or rates of recovery of cisatracurium between ESRD and healthy adult patients.
The t½β values of metabolites are longer in patients with renal failure and concentrations may be higher after long-term administration (see Pharmacokinetics, Special Populations, Intensive Care Unit Patients).
Table 8. Pharmacokinetic Parameters* for Cisatracurium in Healthy Adult Patients and in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Receiving 0.1 mg/kg (2 x ED95) Cisatracurium (Opioid/Nitrous Oxide/Oxygen Anesthesia)
Parameter
| Healthy Adult Patients
| ESRD Patients
|
Elimination Half-Life (t½β, min)
| 29.4 ± 4.1
| 32.3 ± 6.3
|
Volume of Distribution at Steady State† (mL/kg)
| 149 ± 35
| 160 ± 32
|
Plasma Clearance (mL/min/kg)
| 4.66 ± 0.86
| 4.26 ± 0.62
|
* Values presented are mean ± SD.
† Volume of distribution is underestimated because elimination from the peripheral compartment is ignored.
Population pharmacokinetic analyses revealed that patients with creatinine clearances ≤ 70 mL/min had a slower rate of equilibration between plasma concentrations and neuromuscular block than patients with normal renal function; this change was associated with a slightly slower (~ 40 seconds) predicted time to 90% T1 suppression in patients with renal dysfunction following 0.1 mg/kg cisatracurium. There was no clinically significant alteration in the recovery profile of cisatracurium in patients with renal dysfunction. The recovery profile of cisatracurium is unchanged in the presence of renal or hepatic failure, which is consistent with predominantly organ-independent elimination.
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients
The pharmacokinetics of cisatracurium, atracurium, and their metabolites were determined in six ICU patients receiving cisatracurium and in six ICU patients receiving atracurium and are presented in Table 9. The plasma clearances of cisatracurium and atracurium are similar. The volume of distribution was larger and the t1/2β was longer for cisatracurium than for atracurium. The relationships between plasma cisatracurium or atracurium concentrations and neuromuscular block have not been evaluated in ICU patients. The minor differences in pharmacokinetics were not associated with any differences in the recovery profiles of cisatracurium and atracurium in ICU patients.
Table 9. Parameter Estimates* for Cisatracurium, Atracurium, and Metabolites in ICU Patients After Long-Term (24 to 48 Hour) Administration of Cisatracurium or Atracurium Besylate
Parameter
| Cisatracurium (n = 6)
| Atracurium (n = 6)
|
Parent Compound
| CL (mL/min/kg) t½β (min)
Vβ (mL/kg)‡
| 7.45 ± 1.02 26.8 ± 11.1
280 ± 103
| 7.49 ± 0.66† 16.5 ± 6†
178 ± 71†
|
Laudanosine
| Cmax (ng/mL) t½β (hrs)
| 707 ± 360 6.6 ± 4.1
| 2318 ± 1498 8.4 ± 7.3
|
MQA metabolite
| Cmax (ng/mL) t½β (min)
| 152 to 181§ 26 to 31§
| 943 ± 333ll 21 to 58§
|
* Presented as mean ± standard deviation.
† n = 5.
‡ Volume of distribution during the terminal elimination phase, an underestimate because elimination from the peripheral compartment is ignored.
§ n = 2, range presented.
ll n = 3.
Plasma metabolite pharmacokinetics are listed in Table 9. Limited pharmacokinetic data are available for patients with liver/kidney dysfunction receiving cisatracurium. Data from studies of atracurium demonstrate that renal/hepatic failure in ICU patients produces little to no effect on its pharmacokinetics, but decreases the biotransformation and elimination of the metabolites. Following atracurium, t1/2β values for laudanosine were longer in ICU patients with renal failure than in ICU patients with normal renal function (15 and 6 hours, respectively). The t1/2β values of laudanosine were 39 ± 14 hours in ICU patients with liver failure receiving atracurium after an unsuccessful liver transplantation and 5 ± 2 hours in similar ICU patients after successful liver transplantation. Therefore, relative to ICU patients with normal renal and hepatic function receiving cisatracurium, metabolite concentrations (plasma and tissues) may be higher in ICU patients with renal or hepatic failure (see PRECAUTIONS, Long-Term Use in the Intensive Care Unit [ICU]). Consistent with the decreased infusion rate requirements for cisatracurium, metabolite concentrations were lower in patients receiving cisatracurium than in patients receiving atracurium besylate.
Pediatric Patients
The population PK/PD of cisatracurium were described in 20 healthy pediatric patients during halothane anesthesia, using the same model developed for healthy adult patients. The CL was higher in healthy pediatric patients (5.89 mL/min/kg) than in healthy adult patients (4.57 mL/min/kg) during opioid anesthesia. The rate of equilibration between plasma concentrations and neuromuscular block, as indicated by keo, was faster in healthy pediatric patients receiving halothane anesthesia (0.133 minutes-1) than in healthy adult patients receiving opioid anesthesia (0.0575 minutes-1). The EC50 in healthy pediatric patients (125 ng/mL) was similar to the value in healthy adult patients (141 ng/mL) during opioid anesthesia. The minor differences in the PK/PD parameters of cisatracurium were associated with a faster time to onset and a shorter duration of cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block in pediatric patients.
Other Patient Factors
Population PK/PD analyses revealed that gender and obesity were associated with statistically significant effects on the pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics of cisatracurium; these factors were not associated with clinically significant alterations in the predicted onset or recovery profile of cisatracurium. The use of inhalation agents was associated with a 21% larger Vss, a 78% larger keo, and a 15% lower EC50 for cisatracurium. These changes resulted in a slightly faster (~ 45 seconds) predicted time to 90% T1 suppression in patients receiving 0.1 mg/kg cisatracurium during inhalation anesthesia than in patients receiving the same dose of cisatracurium during opioid anesthesia; however, there were no clinically significant differences in the predicted recovery profile of cisatracurium between patient groups.