Laboratory Abnormalities
The percentages of adult subjects treated with ISENTRESS 400 mg twice daily or efavirenz in Protocol 021 with selected Grades 2 to 4 laboratory abnormalities that represent a worsening Grade from baseline are presented in Table 3.
Table 3: Selected Grade 2 to 4 Laboratory Abnormalities Reported in Treatment-Naïve Subjects (156 Week Analysis) | | Randomized Study Protocol 021 |
|---|
| Laboratory Parameter Preferred Term (Unit) | Limit | ISENTRESS 400 mg Twice Daily + Emtricitabine (+) Tenofovir (N = 281) | Efavirenz 600 mg At Bedtime + Emtricitabine (+) Tenofovir (N = 282) |
|---|
| ULN = Upper limit of normal range |
| Hematology |
| Absolute neutrophil count (103/µL) | |
| Grade 2 | 0.75 - 0.999 | 3% | 5% |
| Grade 3 | 0.50 - 0.749 | 2% | 1% |
| Grade 4 | <0.50 | <1% | <1% |
| Hemoglobin (gm/dL) | |
| Grade 2 | 7.5 - 8.4 | 1% | 1% |
| Grade 3 | 6.5 - 7.4 | <1% | 1% |
| Grade 4 | <6.5 | <1% | 0% |
| Platelet count (103/µL) | |
| Grade 2 | 50 - 99.999 | 2% | 0% |
| Grade 3 | 25 - 49.999 | <1% | <1% |
| Grade 4 | <25 | 0% | 0% |
| Blood chemistry |
| Fasting (non-random) serum glucose test (mg/dL) | |
| Grade 2 | 126 - 250 | 4% | 5% |
| Grade 3 | 251 - 500 | 1% | 1% |
| Grade 4 | >500 | 0% | 0% |
| Total serum bilirubin | |
| Grade 2 | 1.6 - 2.5 × ULN | 5% | 0% |
| Grade 3 | 2.6 - 5.0 × ULN | 1% | 0% |
| Grade 4 | >5.0 × ULN | <1% | 0% |
| Serum aspartate aminotransferase | |
| Grade 2 | 2.6 - 5.0 × ULN | 5% | 7% |
| Grade 3 | 5.1 - 10.0 × ULN | 3% | 3% |
| Grade 4 | >10.0 × ULN | 1% | <1% |
| Serum alanine aminotransferase | |
| Grade 2 | 2.6 - 5.0 × ULN | 10% | 9% |
| Grade 3 | 5.1 - 10.0 × ULN | 1% | 2% |
| Grade 4 | >10.0 × ULN | 1% | 1% |
| Serum alkaline phosphatase | |
| Grade 2 | 2.6 - 5.0 × ULN | 1% | 3% |
| Grade 3 | 5.1 - 10.0 × ULN | 0% | <1% |
| Grade 4 | >10.0 × ULN | 0% | <1% |
Lipids, Change from Baseline
Changes from baseline in fasting lipids are shown in Table 4.
Table 4: Lipid Values, Mean Change from Baseline, Protocol 021| Laboratory Parameter Preferred Term | ISENTRESS 400 mg Twice Daily + Emtricitabine (+) Tenofovir N = 281 | Efavirenz 600 mg At Bedtime + Emtricitabine (+) Tenofovir N = 282 |
|---|
| | Change from Baseline at Week 144 | | Change from Baseline at Week 144 |
|---|
Baseline Mean (mg/dL) | Week 144 Mean (mg/dL) | Mean Change
(mg/dL) | Baseline Mean (mg/dL) | Week 144 Mean (mg/dL) | Mean Change
(mg/dL) |
|---|
| Notes: |
| N = Number of subjects in the treatment group. The analysis is based on all available data. |
| If subjects initiated or increased serum lipid-reducing agents, the last available lipid values prior to the change in therapy were used in the analysis. If the missing data was due to other reasons, subjects were censored thereafter for the analysis. At baseline, serum lipid-reducing agents were used in 5% of subjects in the group receiving ISENTRESS and 3% in the efavirenz group. Through Week 144, serum lipid-reducing agents were used in 9% of subjects in the group receiving ISENTRESS and 10% in the efavirenz group. |
| LDL-Cholesterol Fasting (non-random) laboratory tests at Week 144. | 97 | 105 | 7 | 92 | 115 | 22 |
| HDL-Cholesterol | 38 | 43 | 4 | 38 | 48 | 11 |
| Total Cholesterol | 160 | 172 | 13 | 156 | 195 | 39 |
| Triglyceride | 126 | 127 | 1 | 139 | 173 | 35 |
Laboratory Abnormalities
The percentages of adult subjects treated with ISENTRESS 400 mg twice daily or placebo in Protocols 018 and 019 with selected Grade 2 to 4 laboratory abnormalities representing a worsening Grade from baseline are presented in Table 6.
Table 6: Selected Grade 2 to 4 Laboratory Abnormalities Reported in Treatment-Experienced Subjects (96 Week Analysis) | | Randomized Studies Protocol 018 and 019 |
|---|
| Laboratory Parameter Preferred Term (Unit) | Limit | ISENTRESS 400 mg Twice Daily + OBT (N = 462) | Placebo + OBT (N = 237) |
|---|
| ULN = Upper limit of normal range |
| Hematology |
| Absolute neutrophil count (103/µL) | |
| Grade 2 | 0.75 - 0.999 | 4% | 5% |
| Grade 3 | 0.50 - 0.749 | 3% | 3% |
| Grade 4 | <0.50 | 1% | <1% |
| Hemoglobin (gm/dL) | |
| Grade 2 | 7.5 - 8.4 | 1% | 3% |
| Grade 3 | 6.5 - 7.4 | 1% | 1% |
| Grade 4 | <6.5 | <1% | 0% |
| Platelet count (103/µL) | |
| Grade 2 | 50 - 99.999 | 3% | 5% |
| Grade 3 | 25 - 49.999 | 1% | <1% |
| Grade 4 | <25 | 1% | <1% |
| Blood chemistry |
| Fasting (non-random) serum glucose test (mg/dL) | |
| Grade 2 | 126 - 250 | 10% | 7% |
| Grade 3 | 251 - 500 | 3% | 1% |
| Grade 4 | >500 | 0% | 0% |
| Total serum bilirubin | |
| Grade 2 | 1.6 - 2.5 × ULN | 6% | 3% |
| Grade 3 | 2.6 - 5.0 × ULN | 3% | 3% |
| Grade 4 | >5.0 × ULN | 1% | 0% |
| Serum aspartate aminotransferase | |
| Grade 2 | 2.6 - 5.0 × ULN | 9% | 7% |
| Grade 3 | 5.1 - 10.0 × ULN | 4% | 3% |
| Grade 4 | >10.0 × ULN | 1% | 1% |
| Serum alanine aminotransferase | |
| Grade 2 | 2.6 - 5.0 × ULN | 9% | 9% |
| Grade 3 | 5.1 - 10.0 × ULN | 4% | 2% |
| Grade 4 | >10.0 × ULN | 1% | 2% |
| Serum alkaline phosphatase | |
| Grade 2 | 2.6 - 5.0 × ULN | 2% | <1% |
| Grade 3 | 5.1 - 10.0 × ULN | <1% | 1% |
| Grade 4 | >10.0 × ULN | 1% | <1% |
| Serum pancreatic amylase test | |
| Grade 2 | 1.6 - 2.0 × ULN | 2% | 1% |
| Grade 3 | 2.1 - 5.0 × ULN | 4% | 3% |
| Grade 4 | >5.0 × ULN | <1% | <1% |
| Serum lipase test | |
| Grade 2 | 1.6 - 3.0 × ULN | 5% | 4% |
| Grade 3 | 3.1 - 5.0 × ULN | 2% | 1% |
| Grade 4 | >5.0 × ULN | 0% | 0% |
| Serum creatine kinase | |
| Grade 2 | 6.0 - 9.9 × ULN | 2% | 2% |
| Grade 3 | 10.0 - 19.9 × ULN | 4% | 3% |
| Grade 4 | ≥20.0 × ULN | 3% | 1% |
Less Common Adverse Reactions Observed in Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced Studies
The following ADRs occurred in <2% of treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced subjects receiving ISENTRESS in a combination regimen. These events have been included because of their seriousness, increased frequency on ISENTRESS compared with efavirenz or placebo, or investigator's assessment of potential causal relationship.
Gastrointestinal Disorders: abdominal pain, gastritis, dyspepsia, vomiting
General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions: asthenia
Hepatobiliary Disorders: hepatitis
Immune System Disorders: hypersensitivity
Infections and Infestations: genital herpes, herpes zoster
Nervous System Disorders: dizziness
Psychiatric Disorders: depression (particularly in subjects with a pre-existing history of psychiatric illness), including suicidal ideation and behaviors
Renal and Urinary Disorders: nephrolithiasis, renal failure
Patients Co-infected with Hepatitis B and/or Hepatitis C Virus
In the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, treatment-experienced subjects (N = 114/699 or 16%) and treatment-naïve subjects (N = 34/563 or 6%) with chronic (but not acute) active hepatitis B and/or hepatitis C virus co-infection were permitted to enroll provided that baseline liver function tests did not exceed 5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN). In general the safety profile of ISENTRESS in subjects with hepatitis B and/or hepatitis C virus co-infection was similar to that in subjects without hepatitis B and/or hepatitis C virus co-infection, although the rates of AST and ALT abnormalities were higher in the subgroup with hepatitis B and/or hepatitis C virus co-infection for all treatment groups. In treatment-experienced subjects, Grade 2 or higher laboratory abnormalities that represent a worsening Grade from baseline of AST, ALT or total bilirubin occurred in 29%, 34% and 13%, respectively, of co-infected subjects treated with ISENTRESS as compared to 11%, 10% and 9% of all other subjects treated with ISENTRESS. In treatment-naïve subjects, Grade 2 or higher laboratory abnormalities that represent a worsening Grade from baseline of AST, ALT or total bilirubin occurred in 17%, 33% and 17%, respectively, of co-infected subjects treated with ISENTRESS as compared to 8%, 10% and 5% of all other subjects treated with ISENTRESS.
Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry
To monitor maternal-fetal outcomes of pregnant patients exposed to ISENTRESS, an Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry has been established. Physicians are encouraged to register patients by calling 1-800-258-4263.
Effects on Electrocardiogram
In a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 31 healthy subjects were administered a single oral supratherapeutic dose of raltegravir 1600 mg and placebo. Peak raltegravir plasma concentrations were approximately 4-fold higher than the peak concentrations following a 400 mg dose. ISENTRESS did not appear to prolong the QTc interval for 12 hours postdose. After baseline and placebo adjustment, the maximum mean QTc change was -0.4 msec (1-sided 95% upper Cl: 3.1 msec).
Adults
Absorption
Raltegravir (film-coated tablet) is absorbed with a Tmax of approximately 3 hours postdose in the fasted state. Raltegravir AUC and Cmax increase dose proportionally over the dose range 100 mg to 1600 mg. Raltegravir C12hr increases dose proportionally over the dose range of 100 to 800 mg and increases slightly less than dose proportionally over the dose range 100 mg to 1600 mg. With twice-daily dosing, pharmacokinetic steady state is achieved within approximately the first 2 days of dosing. There is little to no accumulation in AUC and Cmax. The average accumulation ratio for C12hr ranged from approximately 1.2 to 1.6.
The absolute bioavailability of raltegravir has not been established. Based on a formulation comparison study in healthy adult volunteers, the chewable tablet has higher oral bioavailability compared to the 400 mg film-coated tablet.
In subjects who received 400 mg twice daily alone, raltegravir drug exposures were characterized by a geometric mean AUC0-12hr of 14.3 µM∙hr and C12hr of 142 nM.
Considerable variability was observed in the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir. For observed C12hr in Protocols 018 and 019, the coefficient of variation (CV) for inter-subject variability = 212% and the CV for intra-subject variability = 122%.
Effect of Food on Oral Absorption
ISENTRESS may be administered with or without food. Raltegravir was administered without regard to food in the pivotal safety and efficacy studies in HIV-1-infected patients. The effect of consumption of low-, moderate- and high-fat meals on steady-state raltegravir pharmacokinetics was assessed in healthy volunteers administered the 400 mg film-coated tablet. Administration of multiple doses of raltegravir following a moderate-fat meal (600 Kcal, 21 g fat) did not affect raltegravir AUC to a clinically meaningful degree with an increase of 13% relative to fasting. Raltegravir C12hr was 66% higher and Cmax was 5% higher following a moderate-fat meal compared to fasting. Administration of raltegravir following a high-fat meal (825 Kcal, 52 g fat) increased AUC and Cmax by approximately 2-fold and increased C12hr by 4.1-fold. Administration of raltegravir following a low-fat meal (300 Kcal, 2.5 g fat) decreased AUC and Cmax by 46% and 52%, respectively; C12hr was essentially unchanged. Food appears to increase pharmacokinetic variability relative to fasting.
Administration of the chewable tablet with a high fat meal led to an average 6% decrease in AUC, 62% decrease in Cmax, and 188% increase in C12hr compared to administration in the fasted state. Administration of the chewable tablet with a high fat meal does not affect raltegravir pharmacokinetics to a clinically meaningful degree and the chewable tablet can be administered without regard to food.
Distribution
Raltegravir is approximately 83% bound to human plasma protein over the concentration range of 2 to 10 µM.
In one study of HIV-1 infected subjects who received raltegravir 400 mg twice daily, raltegravir was measured in the cerebrospinal fluid. In the study (n=18), the median cerebrospinal fluid concentration was 5.8% (range 1 to 53.5%) of the corresponding plasma concentration. This median proportion was approximately 3-fold lower than the free fraction of raltegravir in plasma. The clinical relevance of this finding is unknown.
Metabolism and Excretion
The apparent terminal half-life of raltegravir is approximately 9 hours, with a shorter α-phase half-life (~1 hour) accounting for much of the AUC. Following administration of an oral dose of radiolabeled raltegravir, approximately 51 and 32% of the dose was excreted in feces and urine, respectively. In feces, only raltegravir was present, most of which is likely derived from hydrolysis of raltegravir-glucuronide secreted in bile as observed in preclinical species. Two components, namely raltegravir and raltegravir-glucuronide, were detected in urine and accounted for approximately 9 and 23% of the dose, respectively. The major circulating entity was raltegravir and represented approximately 70% of the total radioactivity; the remaining radioactivity in plasma was accounted for by raltegravir-glucuronide. Studies using isoform-selective chemical inhibitors and cDNA-expressed UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT) show that UGT1A1 is the main enzyme responsible for the formation of raltegravir-glucuronide. Thus, the data indicate that the major mechanism of clearance of raltegravir in humans is UGT1A1-mediated glucuronidation.
Special Populations
Pediatric
The doses recommended for HIV-infected children and adolescents 2 to 18 years of age [see Dosage and Administration (2.3)] resulted in a pharmacokinetic profile of raltegravir similar to that observed in adults receiving 400 mg twice daily. Table 8 displays steady state pharmacokinetic parameters in the 400 mg film-coated tablet (6 to 18 years of age) and the chewable tablet (2 to less than 12 years of age).
Table 8: Raltegravir Steady State Pharmacokinetic Parameters Following Administration of Recommended Doses| Age | Formulation | Dose | N Number of patients with intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) results at the final recommended dose. | Geometric Mean (%CV) AUC0-12hr (µM∙hr) | Geometric Mean (%CV) C12hr (nM) |
|---|
| 12 to 18 years | Film-coated tablet | 400 mg twice daily, regardless of weight Patients in this age group received approximately 8 mg/kg/dose at time of intensive PK which met PK and safety targets. Based on review of the individual profiles and receipt of a mean dose of 390 mg, 400 mg twice daily was selected as the recommended dose for this age group. | 11 | 15.7 (98%) | 333 (78%) |
| 6 to less than 12 years | Film-coated tablet | 400 mg twice daily, for patients ≥25 kg | 11 | 15.8 (120%) | 246 (221%) |
| 6 to less than 12 years | Chewable tablet | Weight based dosing, see Table 1 | 10 | 22.6 (34%) | 130 (88%) |
| 2 to less than 6 years | Chewable tablet | Weight based dosing, see Table 1 | 12 | 18.0 (59%) | 71 (55%) |
The pharmacokinetics of raltegravir in children under 2 years of age has not been established.
Age
The effect of age (18 years and older) on the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir was evaluated in the composite analysis. No dosage adjustment is necessary.
Race
The effect of race on the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir in adults was evaluated in the composite analysis. No dosage adjustment is necessary.
Gender
A study of the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir was performed in healthy adult males and females. Additionally, the effect of gender was evaluated in a composite analysis of pharmacokinetic data from 103 healthy subjects and 28 HIV-1 infected subjects receiving raltegravir monotherapy with fasted administration. No dosage adjustment is necessary.
Hepatic Impairment
Raltegravir is eliminated primarily by glucuronidation in the liver. A study of the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir was performed in adult subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. Additionally, hepatic impairment was evaluated in the composite pharmacokinetic analysis. There were no clinically important pharmacokinetic differences between subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and healthy subjects. No dosage adjustment is necessary for patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment. The effect of severe hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir has not been studied.
Renal Impairment
Renal clearance of unchanged drug is a minor pathway of elimination. A study of the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir was performed in adult subjects with severe renal impairment. Additionally, renal impairment was evaluated in the composite pharmacokinetic analysis. There were no clinically important pharmacokinetic differences between subjects with severe renal impairment and healthy subjects. No dosage adjustment is necessary. Because the extent to which ISENTRESS may be dialyzable is unknown, dosing before a dialysis session should be avoided.
UGT1A1 Polymorphism
There is no evidence that common UGT1A1 polymorphisms alter raltegravir pharmacokinetics to a clinically meaningful extent. In a comparison of 30 adult subjects with *28/*28 genotype (associated with reduced activity of UGT1A1) to 27 adult subjects with wild-type genotype, the geometric mean ratio (90% CI) of AUC was 1.41 (0.96, 2.09).
Drug Interactions [see Drug Interactions (7)]
Table 9: Effect of Other Agents on the Pharmacokinetics of Raltegravir in Adults| Coadministered Drug | Coadministered Drug Dose/Schedule | Raltegravir Dose/Schedule | Ratio (90% Confidence Interval) of Raltegravir Pharmacokinetic Parameters with/without Coadministered Drug; No Effect = 1.00 |
|---|
| n | Cmax | AUC | Cmin |
|---|
| atazanavir | 400 mg daily | 100 mg single dose | 10 | 1.53 (1.11, 2.12) | 1.72 (1.47, 2.02) | 1.95 (1.30, 2.92) |
| atazanavir/ritonavir | 300 mg/100 mg daily | 400 mg twice daily | 10 | 1.24 (0.87, 1.77) | 1.41 (1.12, 1.78) | 1.77 (1.39, 2.25) |
| efavirenz | 600 mg daily | 400 mg single dose | 9 | 0.64 (0.41, 0.98) | 0.64 (0.52, 0.80) | 0.79 (0.49, 1.28) |
| etravirine | 200 mg twice daily | 400 mg twice daily | 19 | 0.89 (0.68, 1.15) | 0.90 (0.68, 1.18) | 0.66 (0.34, 1.26) |
| omeprazole | 20 mg daily | 400 mg single dose | 14 (10 for AUC) | 4.15 (2.82, 6.10) | 3.12 (2.13, 4.56) | 1.46 (1.10, 1.93) |
| rifampin | 600 mg daily | 400 mg single dose | 9 | 0.62 (0.37, 1.04) | 0.60 (0.39, 0.91) | 0.39 (0.30, 0.51) |
| rifampin | 600 mg daily | 400 mg twice daily when administered alone; 800 mg twice daily when administered with rifampin | 14 | 1.62 (1.12, 2.33) | 1.27 (0.94, 1.71) | 0.47 (0.36, 0.61) |
| ritonavir | 100 mg twice daily | 400 mg single dose | 10 | 0.76 (0.55, 1.04) | 0.84 (0.70, 1.01) | 0.99 (0.70, 1.40) |
| tenofovir | 300 mg daily | 400 mg twice daily | 9 | 1.64 (1.16, 2.32) | 1.49 (1.15, 1.94) | 1.03 (0.73, 1.45) |
| tipranavir/ritonavir | 500 mg/200 mg twice daily | 400 mg twice daily | 15 (14 for Cmin) | 0.82 (0.46, 1.46) | 0.76 (0.49, 1.19) | 0.45 (0.31, 0.66) |
Mechanism of Action
Raltegravir inhibits the catalytic activity of HIV-1 integrase, an HIV-1 encoded enzyme that is required for viral replication. Inhibition of integrase prevents the covalent insertion, or integration, of unintegrated linear HIV-1 DNA into the host cell genome preventing the formation of the HIV-1 provirus. The provirus is required to direct the production of progeny virus, so inhibiting integration prevents propagation of the viral infection. Raltegravir did not significantly inhibit human phosphoryltransferases including DNA polymerases α, β, and γ.
Antiviral Activity in Cell Culture
Raltegravir at concentrations of 31 ± 20 nM resulted in 95% inhibition (EC95) of viral spread (relative to an untreated virus-infected culture) in human T-lymphoid cell cultures infected with the cell-line adapted HIV-1 variant H9IIIB. In addition, 5 clinical isolates of HIV-1 subtype B had EC95 values ranging from 9 to 19 nM in cultures of mitogen-activated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In a single-cycle infection assay, raltegravir inhibited infection of 23 HIV-1 isolates representing 5 non-B subtypes (A, C, D, F, and G) and 5 circulating recombinant forms (AE, AG, BF, BG, and cpx) with EC50 values ranging from 5 to 12 nM. Raltegravir also inhibited replication of an HIV-2 isolate when tested in CEMx174 cells (EC95 value = 6 nM). Additive to synergistic antiretroviral activity was observed when human T-lymphoid cells infected with the H9IIIB variant of HIV-1 were incubated with raltegravir in combination with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (delavirdine, efavirenz, or nevirapine); nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors (abacavir, didanosine, lamivudine, stavudine, tenofovir, zalcitabine, or zidovudine); protease inhibitors (amprenavir, atazanavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, or saquinavir); or the entry inhibitor enfuvirtide.
Resistance
The mutations observed in the HIV-1 integrase coding sequence that contributed to raltegravir resistance (evolved either in cell culture or in subjects treated with raltegravir) generally included an amino acid substitution at either Y143 (changed to C, H, or R) or Q148 (changed to H, K, or R) or N155 (changed to H) plus one or more additional substitutions (i.e., L74M, E92Q, Q95K/R, T97A, E138A/K, G140A/S, V151I, G163R, H183P, Y226C/D/F/H, S230R, and D232N).
Treatment-Naïve Adult Subjects: By Week 96 in the STARTMRK trial, the primary raltegravir resistance-associated substitutions were observed in 4 (2 with Y143H/R and 2 with Q148H/R) of the 10 virologic failure subjects with evaluable genotypic data from paired baseline and raltegravir treatment-failure isolates.
Treatment-Experienced Adult Subjects: By Week 96 in the BENCHMRK trials, at least one of the primary raltegravir resistance-associated substitutions, Y143C/H/R, Q148H/K/R, and N155H, was observed in 76 of the 112 virologic failure subjects with evaluable genotypic data from paired baseline and raltegravir treatment-failure isolates. The emergence of the primary raltegravir resistance-associated substitutions was observed cumulatively in 70 subjects by Week 48 and 78 subjects by Week 96, 15.2% and 17% of the raltegravir recipients, respectively. Some (n=58) of those HIV-1 isolates harboring one or more of the primary raltegravir resistance-associated substitutions were evaluated for raltegravir susceptibility yielding a median decrease of 26.3-fold (mean 48.9 ± 44.8-fold decrease, ranging from 0.8- to 159-fold) compared to the wild-type reference.
Description of Clinical Studies
The evidence of durable efficacy of ISENTRESS is based on the analyses of 156-week data from an ongoing, randomized, double-blind, active-control trial, STARTMRK (Protocol 021) in antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected adult subjects and 96-week data from 2 ongoing, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, BENCHMRK 1 and BENCHMRK 2 (Protocols 018 and 019), in antiretroviral treatment-experienced HIV-1 infected adult subjects.
Switch of Suppressed Subjects from Lopinavir (+) Ritonavir to Raltegravir
The SWITCHMRK 1 & 2 Phase 3 studies evaluated HIV-1 infected subjects receiving suppressive therapy (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL on a stable regimen of lopinavir 200 mg (+) ritonavir 50 mg 2 tablets twice daily plus at least 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors for >3 months) and randomized them 1:1 to either continue lopinavir (+) ritonavir (n=174 and n=178, SWITCHMRK 1 & 2, respectively) or replace lopinavir (+) ritonavir with ISENTRESS 400 mg twice daily (n=174 and n=176, respectively). The primary virology endpoint was the proportion of subjects with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/mL at Week 24 with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of -12% for each study; and the frequency of adverse events up to 24 weeks.
Subjects with a prior history of virological failure were not excluded and the number of previous antiretroviral therapies was not limited.
These studies were terminated after the primary efficacy analysis at Week 24 because they each failed to demonstrate non-inferiority of switching to ISENTRESS versus continuing on lopinavir (+) ritonavir. In the combined analysis of these studies at Week 24, suppression of HIV-1 RNA to less than 50 copies/mL was maintained in 82.3% of the ISENTRESS group versus 90.3% of the lopinavir (+) ritonavir group. Clinical and laboratory adverse events occurred at similar frequencies in the treatment groups.
400 mg Film-coated Tablets
Store at 20-25°C (68-77°F); excursions permitted to 15-30°C (59-86°F). See USP Controlled Room Temperature.
Chewable Tablets
Store in the original package with the bottle tightly closed. Keep the desiccant in the bottle to protect from moisture.
Distributed by:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.
Whitehouse Station, NJ 08889, USA
USPI-T-05181304R022
Copyright © 2007, 2009, 2011 Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.
All rights reserved
U.S. Patent Nos. US 7,169,780
Distributed by:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.
Whitehouse Station, NJ 08889, USA
Revised January 2013
USPPI-T-05181301R021
Copyright © 2007, 2009, 2011 Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.
All rights reserved
U.S. Patent Nos. US 7,169,780