The safety and efficacy of POSLUMA were evaluated in LIGHTHOUSE (NCT04186819), a prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study in patients with prostate cancer who were candidates for initial definitive therapy.
The study enrolled 356 patients diagnosed with unfavorable intermediate-risk (32%) or high-/very high-risk prostate cancer (68%) who were candidates for radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Unfavorable intermediate-risk was defined as having any ≥ 2 intermediate risk factors [T2b-T2c, Gleason score 7, PSA 10-20], Gleason pattern 4+3=7, or ≥ 50% of biopsy cores positive for prostate cancer. High or very high-risk was defined as having T3 or T4 disease, Gleason score ≥8, primary Gleason pattern 5, and/or PSA >20.
All patients received a single dose of POSLUMA with an administered radioactivity (mean ± SD) of 307 ± 23 MBq (8.3 ± 0.62 mCi), followed by PET/CT scan from mid-thigh to base of the skull. Three central readers blinded to clinical information independently interpreted each scan for lesions considered positive for prostate cancer in pelvic lymph nodes, categorized by subregion and left and right laterality
[see Dosage and Administration (
2.5)]
. Positive lesions in the prostate gland, lymph nodes outside the pelvis, soft tissue/parenchyma, and bones were also recorded.
A total of 296 patients (83%) underwent standard-of-care prostatectomy and template PLND and had sufficient histopathology data for evaluation of the pelvic lymph nodes. The mean age was 65 years (range 46 to 82 years); distribution by race was 82% White, 8% Black or African American, 0.3% other, and 10% unreported; and distribution by ethnicity was 5% Hispanic/Latino, 86% non-Hispanic/Latino, and 9% unreported. The median serum PSA was 8.4 ng/mL. The total Gleason score was 7 for 45%, 8 for 26%, and 9 for 25% of the patients, with the remainder of the patients having Gleason scores of 6 or 10. Approximately 24% of patients had pelvic lymph node metastases based on histopathology.
POSLUMA performance was evaluated against histopathology after matching by hemipelvis.
Table 6 shows the results, such that at least one true positive hemipelvis region defined a true positive patient.
Table 6: Patient-Level, Hemipelvis Region-Matched Performance of POSLUMA PET for Detection of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis (N1) in LIGHTHOUSE
|
| N=296 | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | Reader 3 |
| True Positive
| 21
| 19
| 16
|
| False Positive
| 16
| 14
| 7
|
| True Negative
| 210
| 212
| 219
|
| False Negative
| 49
| 51
| 54
|
Sensitivity, (%)
[95% CI]
| 30%
[20, 42]
| 27%
[17, 39]
| 23%
[14, 35]
|
Specificity, (%)
[95% CI]
| 93%
[89, 96]
| 94%
[90, 97]
| 97%
[94, 99]
|
Positive Predictive Value,
(%) [95% CI]
| 57%
[40, 73]
| 58%
[39, 75]
| 70%
[47, 87]
|
Negative Predictive Value,
(%) [95% CI]
| 81%
[76, 86]
| 81%
[75, 85]
| 80%
[75, 85]
|
In exploratory analyses, there were numerical trends towards higher sensitivity among patients with PSA greater than or equal to the median value (8.4 ng/mL) and among patients with high-risk or very high-risk categorization.
POSLUMA-positive lesions outside of the prostate gland and pelvic lymph nodes (M1) were also evaluated. As a percentage of the 352 patients with an evaluable POSLUMA scan and of the 61 patients with at least one POSLUMA positive M1 lesion, 10% (95% CI: 7% to 13%) and 56% (95% CI: 42% to 68%), respectively, had at least one matching positive M1 lesion between the POSLUMA majority read and a reference standard consisting of other imaging evaluated by a separate consensus panel or histopathology.