- Follow the PYLARIFY injection with an intravenous flush of 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection USP.
- Dispose of any unused PYLARIFY in compliance with applicable regulations.
Androgen deprivation therapy and other therapies targeting the androgen pathway
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and other therapies targeting the androgen pathway, such as androgen receptor antagonists, may result in changes in uptake of PYLARIFY in prostate cancer. The effect of these therapies on performance of PYLARIFY PET has not been established.
Risk Summary
PYLARIFY is not indicated for use in females. There is no information on the risk of adverse developmental outcomes in pregnant women or animals with the use of piflufolastat F 18. All radiopharmaceuticals, including PYLARIFY, have the potential to cause fetal harm depending on the fetal stage of development and the magnitude of the radiation dose.
Risk Summary
PYLARIFY is not indicated for use in females. There is no information on the presence of piflufolastat F 18 in human milk, the effect on the breastfed infant, or the effect on milk production.
Distribution
Following intravenous administration of piflufolastat F 18, blood levels decline in a biphasic fashion. The distribution half-life is 0.17 ± 0.044 hours and the elimination half-life is 3.47 ± 0.49 hours.
Piflufolastat F 18 distributes to the kidneys (16.5% of administered activity), liver (9.3%), and lung (2.9%), within 60 minutes of intravenous administration.
Elimination
Elimination is by urinary excretion. In the first 8 hours post-injection, approximately 50% of administered radioactivity is excreted in the urine.
OSPREY
OSPREY enrolled a cohort of 268 men with biopsy-proven prostate cancer who were considered candidates for radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. These patients were all considered to have high risk disease based on criteria such as Gleason score, PSA level, and tumor stage. Each patient received a single PYLARIFY PET/CT from mid-thigh to skull vertex.
Three central readers independently interpreted each PET scan for the presence of abnormal PYLARIFY uptake in pelvic lymph nodes in multiple subregions, including the common iliac lymph nodes. The readers were blinded to all clinical information. While readers also recorded the presence of PYLARIFY PET-positive lesions in the prostate gland and outside the pelvis, those results were not included in the primary efficacy analysis.
A total of 252 patients (94%) underwent standard-of-care prostatectomy and template pelvic lymph node dissection and had sufficient histopathology data for evaluation of the pelvic lymph nodes. Surgical specimens were separated into three regions: left hemipelvis, right hemipelvis, and other. For each patient, PYLARIFY PET results and histopathology results obtained from dissected pelvic lymph nodes were compared by surgical region. PET results in locations that were not dissected were excluded from analysis.
For the 252 evaluable patients, the mean age was 64 years (range 46 to 84 years), and 87% were white. The median serum PSA was 9.3 ng/mL. The total Gleason score was 7 for 19%, 8 for 46%, and 9 for 34% of the patients, with the remainder of the patients having Gleason scores of 6 or 10.
Table 5 shows PYLARIFY PET performance by reader through comparison to pelvic lymph node histopathology at the patient-level with region matching, such that at least one true positive region defines a true positive patient. Approximately 24% of the evaluable patients had pelvic lymph node metastases based on histopathology (95% confidence interval: 19%, 29%).
Table 5: Patient-Level, Region-Matched Performance of PYLARIFY PET for Detection of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in OSPREY (n=252) | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | Reader 3 |
|---|
| Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval, PPV = positive predictive value, NPV = negative predictive value |
| True Positive | 23 | 17 | 23 |
| False Positive | 7 | 4 | 9 |
| False Negative | 36 | 43 | 37 |
| True Negative | 186 | 188 | 183 |
| Sensitivity, % (95% CI) | 39 (27, 51) | 28 (17, 40) | 38 (26, 51) |
| Specificity, % (95% CI) | 96 (94, 99) | 98 (95, 99) | 95 (92, 98) |
| PPV, % (95% CI) | 77 (62, 92) | 81 (59, 93) | 72 (56, 87) |
| NPV, % (95% CI) | 84 (79, 89) | 81 (76, 86) | 83 (78, 88) |
In exploratory analyses, there were numerical trends towards more true positive results among patients with total Gleason score of 8 or higher and among patients with tumor stage of T2c or higher relative to those patients with lower Gleason score or tumor stage.
CONDOR
CONDOR enrolled 208 patients with biochemical evidence of recurrent prostate cancer, defined by serum PSA of at least 0.2 ng/mL after radical prostatectomy (with confirmatory PSA level also at least
0.2 ng/mL) or by an increase in serum PSA of at least 2 ng/mL above the nadir after other therapies. The mean age was 68 years (range 43 to 91 years), and 90% of patients were white. The median serum PSA was 0.82 ng/mL. Prior treatment included radical prostatectomy in 85% of the patients.
All enrolled patients had conventional imaging evaluation (for most patients, CT or MRI) within 60 days prior to receiving PYLARIFY PET, and this evaluation was negative or equivocal for prostate cancer. All patients received a single PYLARIFY PET/CT from mid-thigh to skull vertex with optional imaging of the lower extremities.
Three central readers independently evaluated each PYLARIFY PET scan for the presence and location of positive lesions. Location of each lesion was categorized in one of 19 subregions that were grouped into 5 regions (prostate/prostate bed, pelvic lymph nodes, other lymph nodes, soft tissue, bone). The readers were blinded to all clinical information.
Depending on the reader, a total of 123 to 137 patients (59% to 66%) had at least one lesion that was identified as PYLARIFY PET-positive (Table 6, TP + FP + PET-Positive Without Reference Standard). The region most commonly observed to have a PYLARIFY PET-positive finding was pelvic lymph nodes (40% to 42% of all PET-positive regions) and the least common region was soft tissue (6% to 7%).
Depending on the reader, 99 to 104 patients with a PYLARIFY PET-positive region had location-matched composite reference standard information available (Evaluable Set, Table 6, TP + FP) that consisted of histopathology, imaging (CT, MRI, ultrasound, fluciclovine PET, choline PET, or bone scan) obtained within 60 days of the PYLARIFY PET scan, or response of serum PSA level to targeted radiotherapy. Reference standard information for PET-negative regions was not systematically collected in this study.
Table 6 shows patient-level performance results of PYLARIFY PET by reader, including location -matched positive predictive value [true positive / (true positive + false positive)], also known as Correct Localization Rate (CLR). For these results, a patient was considered true positive if they had at least one matching location positive on both PYLARIFY PET and the composite reference standard. In addition to calculating location-matched positive predictive value in the Evaluable Set (CLR), an exploratory analysis of positive predictive value in all scanned patients (Imputed CLR) was performed in which PYLARIFY PET-positive patients who lacked reference standard information were imputed using an estimated likelihood that at least one PET-positive lesion was reference standard positive, based on patient-specific factors.
Table 6: Patient-Level Performance of PYLARIFY PET in CONDOR (n=208) | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | Reader 3 |
|---|
| Abbreviations: TP = true positive, FP = false positive, CLR = location-matched positive predictive value in the Evaluable Set [TP/(TP + FP)], Imputed CLR = location-matched positive predictive value in all scanned patients using an imputation approach based on patient-specific factors for PET-Positive Without Reference Standard, CI = confidence interval |
| True Positive (TP) | 89 | 87 | 84 |
| False Positive (FP) | 15 | 13 | 15 |
| PET-Positive Without Reference Standard | 33 | 24 | 24 |
| PET-Negative | 71 | 84 | 85 |
| CLR % (95% CI) | 86 (79, 92) | 87 (80, 94) | 85 (78, 92) |
| Imputed CLR % (95% CI) | 78 (71, 85) | 81 (74, 88) | 79 (72, 86) |
An exploratory analysis of region-level positive predictive value using only PET-positive regions that had sufficient composite reference standard information to determine true positive or false positive status demonstrated results of 67% to 70% with the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval ranging from 59% to 63%.
The percentage of patients categorized as true positive in a location-matched analysis out of all patients scanned with PYLARIFY was an additional exploratory endpoint. Using the same imputation approach for PET-positive patients who lacked reference standard information as in Table 6 above, this value was 47% to 51%, with the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval ranging from 40% to 45%.
Table 7 shows patient-level PYLARIFY PET results from the majority read stratified by serum PSA level. Percent PET positivity was calculated as the proportion of patients with a positive PYLARIFY PET out of all patients scanned. Percent PET positivity includes patients determined to be either true positive or false positive as well as those in whom such determination was not made due to lack of composite reference standard information. The likelihood of a patient having at least one PYLARIFY PET-positive lesion generally increased with higher serum PSA level.
Table 7: Patient-Level PYLARIFY PET Results and Percent PET PositivityPercent PET positivity = PET positive patients/total patients scanned. PET positive patients include true positive and false positive patients as well as those who did not have reference standard information.
Stratified by Serum PSA Level in the CONDOR Study Using Majority Result Among Three Readers (n=199)Six patients were excluded from this table due to lack of baseline PSA level. Three patients were excluded from this table due to lack of majority result among the categories true positive, false positive, PET positive without reference standard, and PET negative.
| PSA (ng/mL) | PET positive patients | PET negative patients | Percent PET positivity, (95% CI) |
|---|
| Total | TP | FP | Without reference standard |
|---|
| With reference standard |
|---|
| Abbreviations: TP = true positive, FP = false positive, CI = confidence interval |
| <0.5 | 24 | 11 | 4 | 9 | 45 | 35 (24, 46) |
| 15 |
| ≥0.5 and <1 | 18 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 50 (34, 66) |
| 15 |
| ≥1 and <2 | 21 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 68 (51, 84) |
| 18 |
| ≥2 | 57 | 50 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 90 (83, 98) |
| 53 |
| Total | 120 | 88 | 13 | 19 | 79 | 60 (54, 67) |
| 101 |
Storage
Store PYLARIFY at controlled room temperature (USP) 20°C to 25°C (68°F to 77°F). PYLARIFY does not contain a preservative. Store PYLARIFY in the original container with radiation shielding. The expiration date and time are provided on the container label. Use PYLARIFY within 10 hours from the time of end of synthesis.
Handling
This preparation is approved for use by persons under license by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or the relevant regulatory authority of an Agreement State.
Adequate Hydration
Instruct patients to drink a sufficient amount of water to ensure adequate hydration before their PET study and urge them to drink and urinate as often as possible during the first hours following the administration of PYLARIFY, in order to reduce radiation exposure [see Dosage and Administration (2.3) and Warnings and Precautions (5.3)].
Manufactured for:
Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
331 Treble Cove Road
Billerica, MA 01862
PYLARIFY® is a trademark of Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Patent: http://www.lantheus.com/patents/index.html
516091-0521