SHIFT
The Systolic Heart Failure Treatment with the If Inhibitor Ivabradine Trial (SHIFT) was a randomized, double-blind trial comparing ivabradine and placebo in 6,558 adult patients with stable New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II to IV heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%, and resting heart rate ≥ 70 bpm. Patients had to have been clinically stable for at least 4 weeks on an optimized and stable clinical regimen, which included maximally tolerated doses of beta-blockers and, in most cases, ACE inhibitors or ARBs, spironolactone, and diuretics, with fluid retention and symptoms of congestion minimized. Patients had to have been hospitalized for heart failure within 12 months prior to study entry.
The underlying cause of CHF was coronary artery disease in 68% of patients. At baseline, approximately 49% of randomized patients were NYHA class II, 50% were NYHA class III, and 2% were NYHA class IV. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 29%. All patients were initiated on ivabradine 5 mg (or matching placebo) twice daily and the dose was increased to 7.5 mg twice daily or decreased to 2.5 mg twice daily to maintain the resting heart rate between 50 and 60 bpm, as tolerated. The primary endpoint was a composite of the first occurrence of either hospitalization for worsening heart failure or cardiovascular death.
Most patients (89%) were taking beta-blockers, with 26% on guideline-defined target daily doses. The main reasons for not receiving the target beta-blocker doses at baseline were hypotension (45% of patients not at target), fatigue (32%), dyspnea (14%), dizziness (12%), history of cardiac decompensation (9%), and bradycardia (6%). For the 11% of patients not receiving any beta-blocker at baseline, the main reasons were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypotension, and asthma. Most patients were also taking ACE inhibitors and/or angiotensin II antagonists (91%), diuretics (83%), and anti-aldosterone agents (60%). Few patients had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (3.2%) or a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device (1.1%). Median follow-up was 22.9 months. At 1 month, 63%, 26%, and 8% of ivabradine-treated patients were taking 7.5, 5, and 2.5 mg BID, whereas 3% had withdrawn from the drug, primarily for bradycardia.
SHIFT demonstrated that ivabradine reduced the risk of the combined endpoint of hospitalization for worsening heart failure or cardiovascular death based on a time-to-event analysis (hazard ratio: 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75, 0.90, p < 0.0001) (Table 3). The treatment effect reflected only a reduction in the risk of hospitalization for worsening heart failure; there was no favorable effect on the mortality component of the primary endpoint. In the overall treatment population, ivabradine had no statistically significant benefit on cardiovascular death.
Table 3. SHIFT – Incidence of the Primary Composite Endpoint and Components
Endpoint | Ivabradine (N = 3,241) | Placebo (N = 3,264) | |
n | % | % PY | n | % | % PY | Hazard Ratio | [95% CI] | p-value |
Primary composite endpoint: Time to first hospitalization for worsening heart failure or cardiovascular deatha | 793 | 24.5 | 14.5 | 937 | 28.7 | 17.7 | 0.82 | [0.75, 0.90] | <0.0001 |
Hospitalization for worsening heart failure | 505 | 15.6 | 9.2 | 660 | 20.2 | 12.5 | |
Cardiovascular death as first event | 288 | 8.9 | 4.8 | 277 | 8.5 | 4.7 |
Patients with events at any time Hospitalization for worsening heart failureb Cardiovascular deathb | 514 | 15.9 | 9.4 | 672 | 20.6 | 12.7 | 0.74 | [0.66, 0.83] | |
449 | 13.9 | 7.5 | 491 | 15.0 | 8.3 | 0.91 | [0.80, 1.03] | |
a Patients who died on the same calendar day as their first hospitalization for worsening heart failure are counted under cardiovascular death.
b Analyses of the components of the primary composite endpoint were not prospectively planned to be adjusted for multiplicity.
N: number of patients at risk; n: number of patients having experienced the endpoint; %: incidence rate = (n/N) x 100; % PY: annual incidence rate = (n/number of patient-years) x 100; CI: confidence interval
The hazard ratio between treatment groups (ivabradine /placebo) was estimated based on an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model with beta-blocker intake at randomization (yes/no) as a covariate; p-value: Wald test
The Kaplan-Meier curve (Figure 3) shows time to first occurrence of the primary composite endpoint of hospitalization for worsening heart failure or cardiovascular death in the overall study.