The efficacy of NEXOBRID for the eschar removal of deep partial thickness (DPT) and full thickness (FT) thermal burns has been investigated in two trials.
Study 1
NEXOBRID was investigated in the DETECT randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, three-arm study, comparing NEXOBRID, standard of care (SOC), and gel vehicle treatment in subjects with DPT and/or FT thermal burns of 3 - 30% BSA (Study 1, NCT02148705). SOC included both surgical and non-surgical methods for eschar removal per the investigators’ discretion. Subjects on the NEXOBRID and gel vehicle arms who had eschar remaining following the topical treatment period were treated with SOC. NEXOBRID was compared to gel vehicle for the incidence of ≥95% eschar removal at the end of the topical treatment period. NEXOBRID was also compared with SOC for the incidence of surgical eschar removal (tangential, minor, avulsion, Versajet and/or dermabrasion excision) and time to eschar removal.
A total of 175 subjects were randomized in a 3:3:1 ratio (NEXOBRID : SOC : gel vehicle) and 169 subjects were treated. The mean age was 41 years, 70% of subjects were male and 30% were female, and 81% were White, 14% were Black or African American, 5% were other races, and 1% were Asian. Seventeen percent of subjects were Hispanic or Latino. Subjects had one or more target wounds (TWs) to be treated for eschar removal. The mean percentage BSA of all TWs per subject was 6.1%. The majority of subjects (82%) had one to two TWs.
The incidence of ≥95% eschar removal at the end of the topical treatment period for subjects in the NEXOBRID and gel vehicle groups is shown in Table 2.
Table 2: Incidence of ≥95% Eschar Removal at the End of the Topical Treatment Period in NEXOBRID- or Gel Vehicle-Treated Subjects with Deep Partial Thickness and/or Full Thickness Thermal Burns (Study 1; DETECT)
NEXOBRID (N=75) | Gel Vehicle (N=25) | Treatment Difference (95% Confidence Interval) |
93% (70/75) | 4% (1/25) | 89% (74%, 96%) |
The incidence of surgical eschar removal (tangential, minor, avulsion, Versajet and/or dermabrasion excision) and time to ≥95% eschar removal for the NEXOBRID and SOC groups are shown in Table 3.
Table 3: Incidence of Excision for Eschar Removal in NEXOBRID- or SOC-Treated Subjects with Deep Partial Thickness and/or Full Thickness Thermal Burns (Study 1; DETECT)
| SOC = standard of care |
NEXOBRID (N=75) | SOC (N=75) | Treatment Difference (95% Confidence Interval) |
4% (3/75) | 72% (54/75) | -68% (-78%, -56%) |
The median time to eschar removal was 1 day on the NEXOBRID arm and 3.8 days on the SOC arm.
The estimated median time to ≥95% wound closure for all TWs on a subject was 31 days for the NEXOBRID arm and 36 days for the SOC treatment arm. Subjects were not evaluated frequently enough after achieving ≥95% wound closure to adequately assess time to 100% wound closure.
Study 2
NEXOBRID was investigated in a multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-arm study, comparing NEXOBRID to SOC treatment in subjects with DPT and/or FT thermal burns of 5 - 24% BSA (Study 2; NCT00324311). SOC included both surgical and non-surgical methods for eschar removal per the investigators’ discretion. The study enrolled 182 subjects. The first subject at each site (26 subjects) was not randomized and was treated with NEXOBRID. The remaining 156 subjects were randomized to NEXOBRID or SOC. The efficacy assessments were analyzed on DPT burns only.
Demographics were similar across both arms. The mean age was 29.9 years. Approximately 80% of the study subjects were adults (≥18 years), 74% were male and 26% were female, 82% were White, 7% were other races, 6% were Black, and 5% were Asian.
The incidence of surgical eschar removal (tangential, minor, avulsion, Versajet and/or dermabrasion excision) for the NEXOBRID and SOC groups is shown in Table 4.
Table 4: Incidence of Excision of Eschar Removal of Deep Partial Thickness Wounds in Patients with Thermal Burns (Study 2)
SOC = standard of care aAnalysis population includes only patients with at least one wound that was entirely DPT bSurgical eschar removal procedures include (tangential, minor, avulsion, Versajet and/or dermabrasion excision) cAssessement per subject was an exploratory analysis |
| NEXOBRID N=106 Wounds in 49 Subjectsa | SOC N=88 Wounds in 48 Subjectsa | Treatment Difference (95% Confidence Interval) |
Incidence of excision for eschar removal (per wound)b | 15% 16/106 wounds | 63% 55/88 wounds | -47% (-59%, -34%) |
Incidence of excision for eschar removal (per subject)b, c | 22% 11/49 subjects | 77% 37/48 subjects | -55% (-71%, -38%) |
In randomized subjects, the estimated median time to ≥95% wound closure was 33 days for the NEXOBRID arm and 24 days for the SOC treatment arm. Subjects were not evaluated frequently enough after achieving ≥95% wound closure to adequately assess time to 100% wound closure.